Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection comparison

Xcitium and OpenText are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Xcitium is ranked #38 with an average rating of 9.0, while OpenText is ranked #52 with an average rating of 6.0. Xcitium holds a 0.5% mindshare in EPP, compared to OpenText’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Xcitium users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Pr...

Read 17 Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection reviews

1,022 Views
940 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection reviews

1,811 Views
1,612 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Pr...

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection compete in the endpoint security category. Comodo appears to have an edge with its comprehensive feature set, while OpenText is preferred for its simplicity and low resource consumption.

Features: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is noted for its ease of use, lightweight design, and AI-enhanced endpoint security. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection offers powerful sandboxing capabilities, effective zero-day exploit protection, and robust threat detection.

Room for Improvement: OpenText users suggest the need for detailed reporting, enhanced detection capabilities, and more responsive technical support. Comodo could benefit from improved user feedback mechanisms and better logging, as well as handling high CPU usage during scans.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products support cloud environments with flexibility in deployment. OpenText is recognized for its easy public cloud deployment but receives mixed feedback on technical support. Comodo offers broader cloud compatibility and generally better customer service ratings.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is priced around $30 annually per endpoint, praised for cost-effectiveness. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection costs between $16 and $19 per endpoint per year, valued for competitive pricing and solid ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Pr...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

38th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

52nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 0.8%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection	0.5%
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection	0.8%
Other	98.7%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

MehulSharma

CEO at SD GROUP

A cloud solution for endpoint security with DLP

We shared a datasheet with the customer. The customer mentioned that MDM or DLP is included in the product, but she cannot utilize these features in AP Protection, even though they are mentioned in the datasheet. This creates an issue recommending the product to the customer since she cannot use these features. Therefore, when updating your datasheet, clarifying which features apply to the customer's product use is crucial. This clarity is beneficial for both parties. I provide the solution on-premises, but we conduct the POC on the Azure platform. Additionally, we are partners with both Microsoft and AWS. This enables us to offer the AWS and Azure platforms, whichever the customer prefers. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Urs Schuerch

Information Technology Engineer at Ingenias AG

A tool that offers good UI and documentation

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had sent me a physical installation medium, which was very easy to obtain and deploy. It was also easy to configure, and it had a nice UI. I didn't have any problems with the product. I think that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very transparent about the pricing models offered to users. The tool also maintains transparency about the features and specifications. Previously, when I compared the two products with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I saw that with Trend Micro, it is very difficult to transparently find out what it offers and how much it charges for it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It really protects and does its job. It totally blocked every attack attempt, and no attack attempt was successful."

"It's user-friendly, compatible, and accessible."

"Auto Containment is a valuable feature."

"It is a very stable solution, making it an excellent product."

"The big advantage is that it has a sandbox if something bad comes into it."

"The most valuable feature of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is its ability to provide ransomware protection."

"It's a very easy-to-use product."

"Containment is the best feature of the solution."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection pros

"The ease of use of the centralized admin console is its best asset."

"I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution."

"The initial setup was straightforward. It took five minutes. I installed the solution myself."

"The feature we found most valuable is the AI functionality for maintaining endpoint security. This is very powerful."

"The traffic security monitoring, traffic application access feature called the agent, the main feature which is the endpoint security feature are the ones I found valuable. And it also had the in branch security in kind of SD WAN, good three hundred and sixty protection. It is specific and there is ease of deployment also present."

"We've not had any issues with scalability. If an organization needs to expand, they can do so quite easily."

"There aren't any features that really stand out — I just want it to keep malware out of my system. To date, I haven't had any malware in my system."

"It monitors traffic and keeps us from getting ransomware or other viruses."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

Cons

"Support could be improved. Sometimes it is difficult to find exact solutions, and people occasionally get stuck, resulting in delayed responses."

"Would be good to have a better understanding of what it is that you've got in quarantine."

"The solution's online documentation needs to be fine-tuned. It is not up to which solution currently has. There is some inconsistency in the knowledge present. I would like to see MDM in the solution's future releases."

"The licensing fees are high. The company should work to try to lower them for the customer."

"The product must provide a web filter to block websites based on specific categories."

"There could be MDRM features added to the product."

"They need to just modernize the infrastructure with something that is next-generation. We have recently moved to SentinelOne. It had been doing good for us for a while, but we needed something modern with new technology."

"The downside of the product stems from the fact that it is still an unknown product in the market. Comodo needs to invest more in advertisements and promotions."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection cons

"I'm not happy with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, for only one reason. It seems that it slows down my interface when I'm doing programming in Microsoft Access, tremendously."

"I want Webroot to be easier to use and set up. It is not very intuitive."

"We need to have a stronger defense against CryptoLock and other attackers."

"The only complaint I have with Webroot is its inability to prevent UoD phishing and its inability to check against bots or block anti-attacks. Plus the URL server is in zero-definition."

"Unified threat management (UTM) integration."

"One of the biggest pain points is that it's not really ransomware-oriented. They will be able to catch some, but that's where Sentinel One is a better player compared to Webroot."

"Webroot is very reactionary. It waits until the threat is active within memory to try and detect it. They need better pre-execution detection and prevention."

"There needs to be more advanced analytics. It would make it a more powerful antivirus solution within the marketplace."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is pricey."

"I rate the pricing a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The product can be considered fairly cheap."

"It's a cost-effective solution"

"I rate Comodo’s pricing a four out of ten."

"Generally, the cost is between $16 and $19 per endpoint."

"The price of this product should be lower."

"It was about 35 or 40 bucks per year for the endpoint."

"The tool's pricing is not very expensive and falls within the market price. The solution's licensing is on a yearly basis."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

"It is relatively cheap."

"We are on an annual subscription for the use of Webroot Business Endpoint Protection."

"Get a trial, then a multi-year license."

"The solution is pretty cheap, actually. At our level, which is at 2,500 endpoints, we're paying 87 cents an agent per month."

"Work on a price tier plan."

"Its cost is not much per month. Our price is a couple of bucks a user."

"Webroot is less expensive than SentinelOne."

"With Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I can select a yearly billing cycle."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Real Estate/Law Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?

Auto Containment is a valuable feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?

Pricing is competitive and considered average compared to other solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?

There are not many disadvantages, but they need to do some work on DLP integration. Support could be improved. Sometimes it is difficult to find exact solutions, and people occasionally get stuck, ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 37% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 13% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 12% of the time

Malwarebytes Teams vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 11% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 9% of the time

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 20% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 12% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 11% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 8% of the time

Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

September 2025

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection report

Download Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

August 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

Comodo AEP

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

Overview

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) delivers patent-pending auto-containment, where unknown executables and other files that request runtime privileges are automatically run in a virtual contain that does not have access to the host system's resources or user data.

Xcitium

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Christian Motorcyclists Association, City of Thousand Oaks, City of Danville, HRI Properties

Mytech Partners

Buyer's Guide

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

September 2025

Free Report: Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.