Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ comparison

Xcitium and OpenText are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Xcitium is ranked #41 with an average rating of 8.5, while OpenText is ranked #50 with an average rating of 5.0. Xcitium holds a 0.5% mindshare in EPP, compared to OpenText’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Xcitium users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Pr...
Read 17 Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection reviews
  • 1,038 Views
  • 945 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...
Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ reviews
  • 1,859 Views
  • 1,655 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection compete in the endpoint security category. Comodo appears to have an edge with its comprehensive feature set, while OpenText is preferred for its simplicity and low resource consumption.

Features: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is noted for its ease of use, lightweight design, and AI-enhanced endpoint security. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection offers powerful sandboxing capabilities, effective zero-day exploit protection, and robust threat detection.

Room for Improvement: OpenText users suggest the need for detailed reporting, enhanced detection capabilities, and more responsive technical support. Comodo could benefit from improved user feedback mechanisms and better logging, as well as handling high CPU usage during scans.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products support cloud environments with flexibility in deployment. OpenText is recognized for its easy public cloud deployment but receives mixed feedback on technical support. Comodo offers broader cloud compatibility and generally better customer service ratings.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is priced around $30 annually per endpoint, praised for cost-effectiveness. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection costs between $16 and $19 per endpoint per year, valued for competitive pricing and solid ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 872,869 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Pr...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
41st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
50th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ is 0.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection0.5%
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​0.9%
Other98.6%
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

MehulSharma - PeerSpot reviewer
A cloud solution for endpoint security with DLP
We shared a datasheet with the customer. The customer mentioned that MDM or DLP is included in the product, but she cannot utilize these features in AP Protection, even though they are mentioned in the datasheet. This creates an issue recommending the product to the customer since she cannot use these features. Therefore, when updating your datasheet, clarifying which features apply to the customer's product use is crucial. This clarity is beneficial for both parties. I provide the solution on-premises, but we conduct the POC on the Azure platform. Additionally, we are partners with both Microsoft and AWS. This enables us to offer the AWS and Azure platforms, whichever the customer prefers. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Read full review
Urs Schuerch - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool that offers good UI and documentation
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had sent me a physical installation medium, which was very easy to obtain and deploy. It was also easy to configure, and it had a nice UI. I didn't have any problems with the product. I think that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very transparent about the pricing models offered to users. The tool also maintains transparency about the features and specifications. Previously, when I compared the two products with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I saw that with Trend Micro, it is very difficult to transparently find out what it offers and how much it charges for it.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Containment is the best feature of the solution."
"They offer the whole package. Remote monitoring and management (RMM) is included with it, which is pretty nice. They also have Windows patching and third-party patching. It was easy to use for protection. The containment engine was pretty nice for securing our environment."
"Auto Containment is a valuable feature."
"It is a very stable solution, making it an excellent product."
"The tool is an open-source EDR with antivirus features. It also has remote support and patch management."
"The most valuable feature of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is its ability to provide ransomware protection."
"The most valuable feature is the management of end-user machines."
"It's user-friendly, compatible, and accessible."
More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection pros
"Valuable features include good scanning, very light footprint and management console that the client can access and (just as important) in which I can see status of groups of computers (I am a consultant, IT role)."
"It is very lightweight on the workstations, not slowing them down while still doing its job very well."
"They have a lot of features integrated from way back, which shows that the product developers know exactly what they're doing."
"Their policy management, their cloud-based dashboard and user interface are very easy to navigate."
"Its ease of installation is valuable. It has been a low-resource tool and the continuous updates in the past have made it attractive from the standpoint of the trust level on the protection."
"The solution has many features. It is very easy to define and set the policies based on the user groups, it does not take up a lot of resources in operation, and has provided us with a good track record of protection."
"The initial setup was straightforward. It took five minutes. I installed the solution myself."
"Speed"
More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ pros
 

Cons

"Their support is not very good because they are very late to reply."
"The solution's online documentation needs to be fine-tuned. It is not up to which solution currently has. There is some inconsistency in the knowledge present. I would like to see MDM in the solution's future releases."
"The product must provide a web filter to block websites based on specific categories."
"We'd like the solution to include advanced web filtering capabilities, similar to what Sophos offers."
"Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection could improve by extending its auto containment feature to Mac and Linux systems since it currently only supports Windows."
"The locking and backup capabilities of the solution can be improved."
"There are a few minor issues such as package updates and passwords."
"Would be good to have a better understanding of what it is that you've got in quarantine."
More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection cons
"Usually, when it comes to reliability, McAfee and Norton are at 99 percent. Webroot's percentage is lower. It is 94% reliable in terms of what it catches, but you're trading that percentage for customer satisfaction because your computer isn't being constantly told that it just blocked something, or it just did something."
"It needs to improve the problems with the faster connection, and have a huge reduction in false positives."
"The reporting is the weakest part of the Webroot console. Frequently, I export to Excel to massage something into it to pass on to others."
"Their customer support should be better. We started having some issues with it, and we didn't get the required support."
"It would be nice if it had a feature for automatically generating reports on the client end for device status, security status and backup information."
"They should provide more information on the type of cyber attacks."
"There needs to be more advanced analytics. It would make it a more powerful antivirus solution within the marketplace."
"An updated UI would be nice, but is not hardly used."
More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It was about 35 or 40 bucks per year for the endpoint."
"The price of this product should be lower."
"The tool's pricing is not very expensive and falls within the market price. The solution's licensing is on a yearly basis."
"Generally, the cost is between $16 and $19 per endpoint."
"It's a cost-effective solution"
"The product is very reasonably priced."
"I rate the pricing a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The product can be considered fairly cheap."
"Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is inexpensive."
More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice
"Get a trial, then a multi-year license."
"From a pricing standpoint, I would rate it a four out of five."
"Its cost is not much per month. Our price is a couple of bucks a user."
"I think the price is fairly reasonable. I was really prepared to pay more, but the price is fine."
"With Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I can select a yearly billing cycle."
"We evaluate other options using multiple choices, best value, management and functionality."
"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is not too expensive. My licenses cost me between $300 and $400. It is really good price wise."
"I can't recall the exact pricing, but I believe there is a monthly fee of $20-30 per user."
More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
872,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Performing Arts
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Performing Arts
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise1
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business35
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?
Auto Containment is a valuable feature.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?
Pricing is competitive and considered average compared to other solutions.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?
There are not many disadvantages, but they need to do some work on DLP integration. Support could be improved. Sometimes it is difficult to find exact solutions, and people occasionally get stuck, ...
See all answers
What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?
I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection
Compared 27% of the time
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection
Compared 12% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection
Compared 10% of the time
Fortinet FortiClient vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Logo
Fortinet FortiClient vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection
Compared 9% of the time
Intercept X Endpoint vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Logo
Intercept X Endpoint vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection
Compared 9% of the time
More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 20% of the time
HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 11% of the time
Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 9% of the time
Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 8% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Compared 7% of the time
More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection
November 2025
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection reportDownload Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
October 2025
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ reportDownload OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ product report
 

Also Known As

Comodo AEP
Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection
 

Overview

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) delivers patent-pending auto-containment, where unknown executables and other files that request runtime privileges are automatically run in a virtual contain that does not have access to the host system's resources or user data.

Xcitium

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?
  • Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
  • AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
  • Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
  • Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
  • Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic
What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?
  • Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
  • Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
  • Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Christian Motorcyclists Association, City of Thousand Oaks, City of Danville, HRI Properties
Mytech Partners
Buyer's Guide
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
September 2025
Free Report: Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
Find out what your peers are saying about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
872,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.