Zerto and Cohesity Data Cloud offer robust solutions in data management and protection. Cohesity Data Cloud often edges out as the superior product due to its extensive feature set and perceived value for its price.
Features: Zerto users value its continuous data protection and recovery capabilities. Cohesity Data Cloud users highlight its scalability, comprehensive backup functionalities, and superior integration with cloud environments. Cohesity's wider feature set provides a more versatile solution compared to Zerto.
Room for Improvement: Zerto users frequently mention the need for better reporting tools and enhanced integration with non-VMware environments. Cohesity Data Cloud users suggest improvements in the speed of software updates and the support for more diverse storage options. Zerto's integration limitations and Cohesity's update frequency are key differences noted by users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zerto is praised for its straightforward setup process but faces criticism about its customer support responsiveness. Cohesity Data Cloud is recognized for its seamless deployment and proactive customer service. Cohesity stands out with its effective combination of easy deployment and reliable customer support.
Pricing and ROI: Zerto is generally seen as more cost-effective upfront, but users feel that Cohesity Data Cloud delivers better long-term return on investment due to its comprehensive feature set and scalability. Despite higher initial costs, Cohesity's ROI is perceived as favorable compared to Zerto.
If I find myself stuck in a cyber recovery situation, this tool can help me avoid spending my money on ransom payments.
Before, it was a huge cost. It was several thousand dollars to do a DR test, whereas now, I click a button.
It saves us a lot of time and gives us the ability to perform other DR plans for other systems.
The return on investment is evident, as Zerto saves more than 60 percent of time in various operations compared to the previous manual processes.
issues with Cohesity Data Cloud have not been encountered, suggesting a robust service.
Sometimes I face delays, which can be frustrating.
I have never had an issue that was not resolved, and I have never been in a situation where they did not respond.
I would give them a rating of ten because it represents the highest level of support based on the technical knowledge of the support team, response time, and effectiveness of the provided resolutions.
When I open a ticket, I usually get a call within an hour or two.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
Customers need to follow good engineering practices for optimal product use.
By adding more hosts and installing VRAs on each, tasks can be efficiently managed.
I promptly delete the malfunctioning elements and set them up again to resume replication, ensuring stability.
The ease of use was so good with Zerto that they were able to migrate things much quicker.
It is very reliable.
The primary drawback is the need to transfer large amounts of data to the cloud via an internet connection, requiring significant bandwidth.
The pricing of the Cloud is on the higher side, and it should be cost-effective enough to compete with native solutions.
If I have 350 objects that I am protecting, I would like Zerto to be able to fire them up in one order, rather than having to manually bring them up in a sequence.
If the host has a lot of VMs on it, there may not always be enough time to relocate all of the VMs from a protection group standpoint to other hosts before the replication appliance that Zerto uses to manage that powers itself down.
To increase accessibility for small and medium businesses, Zerto should consider a competitive pricing strategy, possibly including subscription-based licensing options.
Cohesity Data Cloud is more costly in the long term compared to physical tapes.
There is an additional cost for infrastructure, which I need to provide.
If you want a good-quality tool that is robust and does a good job for you, you have to pay a higher price to get that, and Zerto is no different.
However, it can become quite expensive when you start looking at the number of workloads you have in the environment and what you would like to do.
Zerto is easier to set up and use, and it's less expensive.
It replicates data to the cloud in a tamper-proof manner, offering protection against ransomware attacks since it is not under administrative control.
They have a feature called DataSock, which enhances data protection.
Zerto offers excellent technical support with responsive and helpful experts.
If we were attacked, I could revert to a backup from five seconds before the attack, and no one would know we were attacked.
The replication time and the minor amount of time it takes to sync a new server outside of any of my huge 40-terabyte boxes is ridiculously quick.
Consolidate your backups, file shares, object stores and data for dev/test and analytics on a web-scale data management platform.
Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
