Cognizant ADPART vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center comparison

Cognizant and OpenText are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Cognizant is ranked #17, while OpenText is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. Cognizant holds a 1.3% mindshare in TMT, compared to OpenText’s 12.6% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.

Cognizant ADPART

494 Views
61 Comparison Views

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Read 207 OpenText ALM / Quality Center reviews

2,162 Views
778 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Cognizant ADPART

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cognizant ADPART and OpenText ALM / Quality Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Management Tools Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cognizant ADPART

Ranking in Test Management Tools

17th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Design Automation (1st)

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Ranking in Test Management Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

207

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Cognizant ADPART is 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText ALM / Quality Center is 12.6%, up from 12.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Use Cognizant ADPART?

Share your opinion

Huong Vuong

Sap Fico Consultant at Avient Corporation

Effective testing and good data management with seamless Excel integration

There are cases where the system does not meet our reporting requirements. For example, only the first user can click 'run' during testing, and subsequent users have to click 'continue manual run', which can create reporting errors. Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Insurance Company

Healthcare Company

Educational Organization

63%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The most valuable feature is the ST Add-In. It's a Microsoft add-in that makes it much easier to upload test cases into Quality Center.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

We work with Jira now, and there are some very good workflows. There could be more configurable workflows regarding test case creation approval. I see a stable tool that remains relevant in the mar...

See all answers

Comparisons

TFS vs Cognizant ADPART

Compared 100% of the time

More Cognizant ADPART Competitors

OpenText ALM Octane vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 19% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 13% of the time

Jira vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText ALM / Quality Center Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

June 2025

Download Cognizant ADPART product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

May 2025

Download OpenText ALM / Quality Center product report

Also Known As

ADPART

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM

Overview

Cognizant ADPART is a Model-based testing product that enables organization get their products business ready 30% faster and ensure 100% quality coverage.

ADPART lets users model business flows and automates test design eliminating the need for manual authoring of test cases.

Cognizant

OpenText ALM/Quality Center serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps you govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

June 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.