We performed a comparison between Codespaces and Eclipse Luna based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub, Amazon Web Services (AWS), JetBrains and others in IDE."The product allows us to implement feature-related changes or improvements on time. Whenever I write a section of the code or create a new code, it automatically integrates with the former code."
"The most valuable features of the solution are Copilot and Advanced Security."
"Codespaces' most valuable feature is the repository, which helps the developers to work together. Its data commands are also useful."
"Eclipse's auto-code suggestion feature makes programming very easy and fast."
"It is very extensible and uses resources optimally."
"It works like a one-stop shop for all of our application development requirements."
"The product indicates incorrect statistics."
"The technical support could respond faster."
"We get merge conflict errors and need to resolve them."
"Eclipse can sometimes be a plugin nightmare. Various plugins require different versions of the same plugin running for different reasons."
"The development of the product needs improvement."
"I would like to see it extend native support for functional languages like Scala."
Codespaces is ranked 1st in IDE with 3 reviews while Eclipse Luna is ranked 5th in IDE with 3 reviews. Codespaces is rated 8.6, while Eclipse Luna is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Codespaces writes "Used to integrate into the CI/CD process and streamline the editing and updating of code". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Eclipse Luna writes "Good plugins and helpful templates with a useful auto-code suggestion feature". Codespaces is most compared with AWS Cloud9, Replit, JetBrains IDEs, RStudio and Docker, whereas Eclipse Luna is most compared with Oracle SQL Developer.
See our list of best IDE vendors.
We monitor all IDE reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.