IBM Spectrum Protect vs Mimecast Incydr comparison

The compared IBM and Mimecast solutions aren't in the same category. IBM is ranked #14 in BRS , with an average rating of 7.3, and holds a 2.2% mindshare in the category. Mimecast is ranked #25 in DLP , with an average rating of 7.0, and holds a 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Mimecast users who would recommend it.

IBM Spectrum Protect

Read 150 IBM Spectrum Protect reviews

3,421 Views
2,509 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Mimecast Incydr

Read 78 Mimecast Incydr reviews

848 Views
473 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

IBM Spectrum Protect

Mimecast Incydr

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

IBM Spectrum Protect and Code42 Incydr offer robust data protection solutions, but they cater to different needs. Code42 Incydr seems to have the upper hand in endpoint security while IBM Spectrum Protect stands out in data backup capabilities.

Features: IBM Spectrum Protect is recognized for its scalability, data backup capabilities, and handling of various workloads. Code42 Incydr focuses on endpoint data loss protection, real-time threat detection, and a lightweight footprint.

Room for Improvement: IBM Spectrum Protect users request improvements in software complexity, platform integration, and user interface. Code42 Incydr users seek enhanced data recovery, more intuitive reporting, and greater customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Spectrum Protect often requires a more complex setup process that can be time-consuming, but its customer service is responsive and knowledgeable. Code42 Incydr is praised for its straightforward deployment and effective support, making it appealing for organizations prioritizing quick implementation and responsive assistance.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Spectrum Protect is seen as a costlier option upfront, but users acknowledge its long-term ROI through reduced downtime and data loss incidents. Code42 Incydr is noted for a more budget-friendly initial setup with rapid ROI due to its effective endpoint protection.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Spectrum Protect vs. Mimecast Incydr Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Spectrum Protect vs. Mimecast Incydr

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,957 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Spectrum Protect

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

150

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (14th)

Mimecast Incydr

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (25th)

Mindshare comparison

IBM Spectrum Protect and Mimecast Incydr aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. IBM Spectrum Protect is designed for Backup and Recovery and holds a mindshare of 2.2%, up 2.2% compared to last year.
Mimecast Incydr, on the other hand, focuses on Data Loss Prevention (DLP), holds 2.0% mindshare, up 1.5% since last year.

Backup and Recovery

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Syed Habib

Head of Infrastructure Security (S.A.V.P) at EXIM Bank Ltd

Manageable and comprehensive and integrates robust backup features for core banking

It's adequate for my core banking, however, I am looking for another solution for all systems. It is not compatible with other operating systems like Windows or Linux, and lacks a consolidated dashboard from Browser Spectrum. This is why I am searching for another solution. The product also lacks any centralized graphical user interface (GUI), such as Jarek Pod, and I am limited to using a console-based text user interface, which my local partner handles completely.

Read full review

Chuck_Mackey

Director, Cybersecurity Consulting at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Provides comprehensive visibility and protection, helps in identifying the gaps in security, and comes with excellent onboarding support

In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue. It really has to do with the overall infrastructure and what the organization is prepared to do. If the infrastructure or the networking is a little hinky or you don't have a really finely tuned network infrastructure environment and your patches aren't up to date on your servers and your endpoints, it could get a little sticky. Other than that, it was okay. We really didn't have much problem beyond that. It took a couple of days to sort that out, but it was no big deal.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It integrates well with Spectrum Scale."

"The feature that I have found the most valuable is that IBM Spectrum Protect is highly integrated with IBM ESS. In addition, it allows us to back up our virtual servers directly to take VM snapshots. It runs on Linux as well."

"The feature we have found most valuable is when you want to integrate it with a Tape Library and then do the DRM life cycle. That is when it works the best."

"by backing up only the changed data, we average around 75TB per night. If we had to do full backups, even occasionally, we would not be able to complete the backup within 12 hours, or we would have to make a large investment to fit a full backup within the 12 hour window."

"The most valuable features are the stability and also how it's seamlessly integrated with other IBM offerings."

"We apply the new dedupe and compression technology, using maintenance and time to give more time for the backup window and less time for the overhead related to the daily housekeeping."

"Every time customers make a change or we have made a change, then they use the product to do a cloning and refreshing. They are happy that they get good performance something changes."

"Enterprise-wide type of architecture supports a lot of different platforms."

More IBM Spectrum Protect pros

"There are a couple of things. One of them is that they have what they call Incydr. Their detection and response solution to the insider threat area is called Incydr. That gives visibility to the clients that have widely dispersed employee bases due to work from home, or that had a dispersed workforce predating any of the work from home requirements. Even though they might not be inside the organization physically, they're inside the organization. It allows us to get some visibility into what people are doing, what the context is, and how to control what might be the potential for intellectual property theft or file exposure."

"Low system overhead, setting retention policies, ease of use"

"Security tools: Being able to monitor data going in and coming off our endpoints. Seeing what it is and where it's going is awesome."

"Code42 Next-Gen DLP is scalable."

"It had the ability to preseed by sending in a data drive and could restore by sending the user a data drive."

"The solution is very stable. Very rarely do we have any issues with it. We don't have to deal with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. We find it to be reliable."

"Works in the background and users are able to perform restores."

"It required very little ongoing maintenance once setup."

More Mimecast Incydr pros

Cons

"The administration interface should implement more functionalities that exist only in the command line and needs improvement in how some reports are created."

"Better integration with other tools and databases is needed."

"They need to do a better job on Windows, because if you are running Windows, the scalability is more limited than AIX and Linux."

"Integration with Windows environments needs improvement. It should be more "assisted", both at the application and database level. It remains a product that fits better in Unix/Linux environments than in Windows environments, given its configuration procedures."

"We are not so happy with the technical support because dealing with them is not easy. We have a very complicated environment, therefore I understand for a support person that it is not easy to troubleshoot it."

"I find the Level 1 and Level 2 support spend 80% of the time communicating the same information that I have already provided."

"High availability (HA) is a scalability challenge."

"The solution is evolving, so it has to be evolved to fit all new types of software requirements too."

More IBM Spectrum Protect cons

"In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue."

"More security would be nice, I would love to be able to remotely brick a stolen laptop and it's hard disk drive (HDD)."

"Java, please get rid of Java."

"I think one we can improve is the compression."

"I would like to see more flexibility on privileges, perhaps create another kind of admin for regions. Also, I would like the ability to access logs without having to be on the actual device or a super-admin."

"You can't always filter out data that you'd like to."

"The application, written in Java, required far more system resources on a Client than other solutions."

"Reporting could use an overhaul. It is very limited."

More Mimecast Incydr cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing fees are between $8,000 and $10,000 per year."

"The licensing is varied. If we have small environments (not many TB being managed) it is best to license by PVUs (depending on the number of cores of the machine). If we manage many TBs we look at licensing by capacity which allows us to use all the agents of the product."

"IBM Spectrum Protect can be considered an averagely-priced product."

"The product is low cost. It is very cool when we design it to using licensing based on post capacity."

"Regarding retro-compatibility of the product between versions, your data is always available and the ROI is unquestionable."

"We have spec'd out our build, and the cost of it can work quite easily today for our future needs."

"It is really expensive. Its price is not good for Latin America. Its price is good for the United States or Europe."

"Its licensing is complex, and its price is not really reasonable. It is on the expensive side. IBM, in general, is slightly expensive, but with IBM Spectrum for the virtual environment, they are looking into the aspect of helping customers with the cost and providing a cost-effective solution."

More IBM Spectrum Protect pricing and cost advice

"It used to be a good solution for SOHO in particular as it had unlimited storage for a reasonable price. However, their pricing model has changed and they are now primarily targeting enterprise users."

"The pricing is reasonable. It's my understanding that the cost is about $7 for unlimited storage in the cloud per server."

"It was expensive. It was more expensive than Eureka, and it was more expensive than Barracuda Backup, but what we got was a full team. They didn't come in and nickel and dime us. They provided the assistance we needed. They didn't say that they need to charge us for something or it is going to take another statement of work. It was all bundled into it... We pay for the software maintenance. It is probably 18% or 20% of the license fee for rev releases."

"They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest."

"It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,957 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Spectrum Protect?

IBM Spectrum Protect is stable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Spectrum Protect?

It's expensive. I acknowledge the cost associated with it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Spectrum Protect?

One point for improvement for IBM Spectrum Protect is security, as IBM has not been investing as much as in the past. There is a need for additional layers of security to fill the gaps, which is wh...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Code42 Incydr?

Data Leakage Protection on large scale environments. This can be to protect against leakage on endpoints and servers that consist of highly classified or propriety information. It can be added on a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs IBM Spectrum Protect

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs IBM Spectrum Protect

Compared 15% of the time

Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) vs IBM Spectrum Protect

Compared 12% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs IBM Spectrum Protect

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Storage Protect vs IBM Spectrum Protect

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM Spectrum Protect Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 14% of the time

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 10% of the time

Digital Guardian vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 9% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 8% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 8% of the time

More Mimecast Incydr Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Spectrum Protect

June 2025

Download IBM Spectrum Protect product report

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Incydr

June 2025

Download Mimecast Incydr product report

Also Known As

IBM TSM, IBM Tivoli Storage Manager

Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore

Overview

IBM Spectrum Protect (Tivoli Storage Manager) is a data protection platform that gives enterprises a single point of control and administration for backup and recovery. It is the flagship product in the IBM Spectrum Protect (Tivoli Storage Manager) family. It enables reliable, cost effective backups and fast recovery for virtual, physical and cloud environments of all sizes.

IBM

Mimecast Incydr offers a comprehensive data protection and recovery solution, ideal for organizations needing robust insider threat protection and regulatory compliance.

Mimecast Incydr provides a seamless experience across platforms with lightweight clients and centralized administration. It focuses on real-time monitoring, instant access to backups, strong encryption, and customizable risk scoring. This ensures data protection against insider threats while promoting ease of use and low system overhead. Although improvements are possible in areas like Java dependency reduction, GUI design, cloud storage integration, and comprehensive reporting, Mimecast Incydr remains valuable for data classification, legal discovery, and identity management, especially for large environments handling classified information.

What key features does Mimecast Incydr offer?

Lightweight Clients: Ensures minimal system impact
Version Backups: Keeps data secure with historical availability
Seamless Data Recovery: Provides instant access to critical data
Multi-Platform Compatibility: Operates across diverse systems
Strong Encryption: Protects sensitive information
Customizable Risk Scoring: Tailors threat assessment to needs
Flexible Storage Options: Supports continuous backup capabilities

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Ease of Use: Simplifies deployment and management
Regulatory Compliance: Aids adherence to industry standards
Centralized Administration: Streamlines management processes
Low System Overhead: Minimizes resource consumption
Real-Time Monitoring: Facilitates prompt threat response

Mimecast Incydr is leveraged across industries for data leakage protection and egress solution integration. It supports HIPAA-compliant backups and peer-to-peer data management, proving invaluable for corporate data protection and traveling employees facing data loss risks. Its application in legal data discovery and disaster recovery planning enhances its relevance for IT administrators and compliance officers managing data-intensive operations.

Mimecast

Sample Customers

CERN, Einstein Healthcare, Nyherji, Allianz Australia, TZM, ABT Online, NCT, Kindred Healthcare Inc., Cobalt Iron, TransGrid, Baptist Health of Northeast Florida, Cash America, Piedmont Healthcare, RWGV, Arkansas Tech University, British Columbia Institute of Technology

Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.

Buyer's Guide

IBM Spectrum Protect vs. Mimecast Incydr

April 2025

Free Report: IBM Spectrum Protect vs. Mimecast Incydr

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Spectrum Protect vs. Mimecast Incydr and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,957 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Spectrum Protect vs. Mimecast Incydr report.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.