Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025
SAP IQ and CockroachDB compete in the field of data management, with SAP IQ having an advantage in query performance due to its columnar storage, while CockroachDB excels in distributed architecture and fault-tolerance.
Features: SAP IQ’s columnar storage enhances high compression and query speed, making it ideal for business intelligence. Its indexing further boosts query performance and offers a compact storage footprint. Users value its fast data loading and high concurrency capabilities. CockroachDB’s standout features include its distributed architecture and geo-partitioning, which support robust performance in distributed deployments. The node syncing and compatibility with PostgreSQL add to its adaptability.
Room for Improvement: SAP IQ needs better redundancy features like improved disaster recovery options and accessible backup solutions. There is a need for enhanced marketing efforts and documentation. CockroachDB could improve its PostgreSQL compatibility and geo-partitioning capabilities, which require better query management. Its pricing and setup clarity also need refinement for enterprise adoption.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP IQ's on-premises deployment suits existing infrastructures but lacks flexibility compared to CockroachDB’s hybrid model with cloud support. SAP IQ users face issues with technical support, requiring more responsive services and expert access. CockroachDB is praised for its global support infrastructure and effective customer service.
Pricing and ROI: SAP IQ offers adaptable licensing models and has become more competitively priced, especially for partitioning. CockroachDB’s flexible pricing, including a free tier, is attractive for smaller deployments, providing performance benefits that justify the investment despite potentially higher enterprise pricing.
To learn more, read our detailed
CockroachDB vs. SAP IQ Report (Updated: September 2025).
