CloverETL vs Domo comparison

Javlin and Domo are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Javlin is ranked #65, while Domo is ranked #46 with an average rating of 7.0. Javlin holds a 0.2% mindshare in DI, compared to Domo’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Javlin users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of Domo users who would recommend it.

CloverETL

Read 2 CloverETL reviews

200 Views
159 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Domo

Read 37 Domo reviews

258 Views
205 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

CloverETL

Domo

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

CloverETL and Domo compete in data integration and business intelligence markets, respectively. Domo has the advantage with its extensive feature set, although CloverETL may be preferred for specific data transformation tasks.

Features: CloverETL provides flexible ETL capabilities, customizable workflows, and an open architecture for system integration. Domo offers data visualization, dashboards, and real-time reporting. The primary distinction is CloverETL's focus on the ETL process versus Domo's emphasis on actionable insights and visual analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloverETL uses a traditional deployment model with on-premise installations, requiring longer setup times but offering control over the data environment. Domo offers cloud-based deployment for faster implementation and scalability. Both platforms provide comprehensive customer support, but Domo's support is recognized for accessibility and responsiveness, aiding in onboarding and issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: CloverETL offers a modular pricing model with lower setup costs, providing a higher ROI for businesses primarily focused on ETL processes. Domo has higher initial investment costs due to its broad suite of features, with potential for greater ROI through enhanced data insights and decision-making capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed CloverETL vs. Domo Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. Domo

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloverETL

Ranking in Data Integration

65th

Ranking in Data Visualization

47th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Domo

Ranking in Data Integration

46th

Ranking in Data Visualization

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (15th), Business Performance Management (15th), Reporting (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of CloverETL is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Domo is 0.5%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

it_user854766

Vice President, Information and Technology Services at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors

* Familiar, intuitive GUI (Eclipse plug-in) coming from a Java development background. * In-depth, descriptive, and well-laid-out documentation. * Responsive support through forums, even directly from Clover staff. * Wealth of pre-defined components. * All components are customizable. * Descriptive logging, especially for error messages. * Ease of install/light footprint.

Read full review

James John Wilson

Business Development Manager at Freelancer

Robust, powerful, and easy to use

There were very few cases on some of the tables, the data tables, where I wish there was an additional feature or two. However, they were particular. What I wanted to see was the ability to collapse when you group a set of rows, let's say when you group them by status or health, so you have your red projects grouped up top. I wanted to compress or collapse that group of red and then open the yellow projects and then the green projects. There were a bit more features in the tables than I wanted to see. They have a widget that you can use either in Microsoft PowerPoint to pull over data into your PowerPoints and refresh graphs or charts or metrics or tables. I would love to see that available in Google Slides. I used it successfully in PowerPoint; however, at one company, they were only using Google products, and so that widget didn't help with reporting in slides. Therefore, we had to do a bit more manual work for our quarterly business reviews or monthly business reviews to produce our executive presentations. Sometimes the fonts were difficult to read if you're trying to put a lot of data in a table and show a lot of rows. Sometimes the fonts got too light, and you had to really play with it to try and figure out how to make it readable. One thing I had to do, and I don't know if it's necessarily a bad thing, was when I was running a meeting, I would have to go turn off the data jobs. If I was running a meeting and a lot of times people were scrambling in the background to do their updates even as the meeting was occurring, it would cause the page to render very slowly. It would sometimes pause or freeze. I found that if I went and turned off the status, the data update jobs that we're pulling data from Smartsheet, then the meetings would work more smoothly, and there were no interruptions or delays.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."

"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."

"No dependence on native language and ease of use."

"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."

"With ETL transformations in SQL lists, you often write a lot of queries. You have to build a bunch of code for the data. With Domo, one of the pieces we have is Magic ETL. In Magic ETL, you don't need to write code. You don't need to be a specialist in SQL or any database query language."

"The ease of use, overall, is one of the valuable features, as is the ease of setup. Other than making sure IT was aware of, and agreed with our proceeding, we did not need IT for any of the setup. The ease of setup is more valuable than you might think. The ease of configuring the security policies, setting up groups, and setting up personalized data permissions so that only certain people can see certain data — that stuff is amazing... Domo really is extraordinarily full-featured, but it's really easy to use."

"The ETL tools they have in Redshift are pretty awesome... I can work in Redshift to get the data from AWS and work in Redshift, in Domo, to create Transforms and the data structure we need..."

"The best thing is that the data storage is pretty much free. I can store as much data as I want, from different sources."

"All our client SLAs and daily and weekly dashboards are tracked on Domo."

"The user interface is quite good."

"Domo is not a difficult tool to learn. All you need to know is the SQL for the ETL part. You don't need to write much code. That's the great part. It uses legacy languages, like SQL, which is very common among developers who then don't have to go and learn Domo's own syntax. Therefore, you don't have to learn another hard language to use Domo."

"The solution is highly stable."

More Domo pros

Cons

"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."

"Its documentation could be improved."

"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."

"I would like to see more dashboard creation options."

"Domo or any other BI tool has room for improvement, in particular, in the calculations. User-guided material isn't available for calculations. The tool, though user-friendly, could also be more customizable, especially when you're building a dashboard. Data integration could also be improved in Domo because even if the tool connects to multiple data sources, some hiccups still arise and need to be addressed."

"One of the improvements that could be made is related to improved storage options."

"It is very difficult too, if we do have specific requests or errors that we can't get figure out - especially when it comes to the development platform, developing custom connectors or doing any kind of API work, custom cards - in that there's a lag in the response time."

"I would like to see more flexibility in their pricing structure. The trend is moving from database pricing to a user-license pricing model. That would be a benefit if they wanted to reevaluate their pricing structure."

"I would also like to see improvements to their drag and drop Magic ETL tool. You can drag and drop your ETL tool, but it doesn't really work for a large amount of data. It struggles with that. In a real-world application, where you're working with 30 million rows or 100 million rows, it takes a bit longer to process the data. If you do it in the Redshift ETL tool, using your own code, it's much faster."

"It is expensive."

"There's a learning curve before you can get used to the solution."

More Domo cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We are making money from Domo, and all our clients are happy with the information that they receive from it."

"I think it is reasonable."

"For about 100 users our cost is $95,800."

"The pricing differs from customer to customer, depending on the package."

"It started out at about $600 a seat. However, then as we started to grow, it scaled that down to about $330 or 3$50 a seat, if I'm not mistaken."

"No matter if you're a developer or an end-user, the licensing cost is around $12 per user per month."

"I'm not sure about pricing, but I believe Domo is quite costly. Prior to joining this organization, I had a Domo license with my former employer and I think that license was around $500 to $600 annually. That was for a single license. I think it varies, depending on the organization that is acquiring Domo."

"I believe that the investment in Domo was worthwhile because it allowed for the organization to jump in quickly, with little training. There are different plans available based on the requirements."

More Domo pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

12%

University

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Domo?

All our client SLAs and daily and weekly dashboards are tracked on Domo.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Domo?

Domo is expensive compared to other solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Domo?

One of the biggest problems is that end users require a license to run their own reports and dashboards, which are fairly expensive. Domo is also not the easiest product to use and is more expensiv...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Tableau vs Domo

Compared 43% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Domo

Compared 38% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Domo

Compared 4% of the time

Databricks vs Domo

Compared 3% of the time

Looker vs Domo

Compared 2% of the time

More Domo Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

March 2025

Download CloverETL product report

Buyer's Guide

Domo

April 2025

Download Domo product report

Also Known As

No data available

corda

Overview

CloverETL is a rapid, end-to-end data integration solution. Businesses choose CloverETL for its usability and intuitive controls, along with its lightweight footprint, flexibility, and processing speed. Achieving true, rapid data integration means much more than just raw data processing power. Rapid refers to an end-to-end process that begins the moment a data-related problem is recognized to the point when the data is in the right place and form to be analyzed and monetized.

Javlin

Domo is a cloud-based, mobile-first BI platform that helps companies drive more value from their data by helping organizations better integrate, interpret and use data to drive timely decision making and action across the business. The Domo platform enhances existing data warehouse and BI tools and allows users to build custom apps, automate data pipelines, and make data science accessible for anyone through automated insights that can be shared with internal or external stakeholders.

Find more information on The Business Cloud Here.

Domo

Sample Customers

IBM, Oracle, MuleSoft, GoodData, Thomson Reuters, salesforce.com, Comcast, Active Network, SHOP.CA

Capco, SABMiller, Stance, eBay, Sage North America, Goodwill Industries of Central Indiana, Telus, The Cliffs, OGIO International Inc., and many more!

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. Domo

April 2025

Free Report: CloverETL vs. Domo

Find out what your peers are saying about CloverETL vs. Domo and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloverETL vs. Domo report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Data Visualization vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.