Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CloudDefense SAST vs GitGuardian Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudDefense SAST
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
65th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
GitGuardian Platform
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
4th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (8th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (6th), Software Supply Chain Security (4th), DevSecOps (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of CloudDefense SAST is 0.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitGuardian Platform is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 

Featured Reviews

Use CloudDefense SAST?
Share your opinion
Ney Roman - PeerSpot reviewer
Facilitates efficient secret management and improves development processes
Regarding the exceptions in GitGuardian Platform, we know that within the platform we have a way to accept a path or a directory from a repository, but it is not that visible at the very beginning. You have to figure out where to search for it, and once you have it, it is really good, but it is not that visible at the beginning. This should be made more exposed. The documentation could be better because it was not that comprehensively documented. When we started working with GitGuardian Platform, it was difficult to find some specific use cases, and we were not aware of that. It might have improved now, but at that time, it was not something we would recommend.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
860,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
22%
Government
16%
Media Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?
It's also worth mentioning that GitGuardian is unique because they have a free tier that we've been using for the first twelve months. It provides full functionality for smaller teams. We're a smal...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?
It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.
What needs improvement with GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?
GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives. We utilize the automated playbooks from GitGuardian Platform, and we are enhancing them. We will pr...
 

Also Known As

No data available
GitGuardian Internal Monitoring
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Atlassian 2. Cisco 3. Google 4. IBM 5. Intel 6. Microsoft 7. Oracle 8. SAP 9. VMware 10. Accenture 11. Deloitte 12. EY 13. KPMG 14. PwC 15. AWS 16. Azure 17. Google Cloud Platform 18. IBM Cloud 19. Oracle Cloud 20. SAP Cloud Platform 21. VMware Cloud 22. Akamai 23. Cloudflare 24. Fastly 25. Google Domains 26. GoDaddy 27. Namecheap 28. Network Solutions 29. Verisign
Automox, 66degrees (ex Cloudbakers), Iress, Now:Pensions, Payfit, Orange, BouyguesTelecom, Seequent, Stedi, Talend, Snowflake... 
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: June 2025.
860,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.