Cloud Rewind (formerly Appranix) vs HPE Zerto Software comparison

Commvault and Zerto acquired by HPE are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. Commvault is ranked #37 with an average rating of 9.0, while Zerto acquired by HPE is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.8. Commvault holds a 0.2% mindshare in CB, compared to Zerto acquired by HPE’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Commvault users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Zerto acquired by HPE users who would recommend it.

Cloud Rewind (formerly Appr...

Read 1 Cloud Rewind (formerly Appranix) review

261 Views
172 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE Zerto Software

Read 341 HPE Zerto Software reviews

13,642 Views
6,275 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Cloud Rewind (formerly Appr...

HPE Zerto Software

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 11, 2025

HPE Zerto Software and Cloud Rewind are disaster recovery solutions. Cloud Rewind appears to have the upper hand due to its feature-rich experience, despite its higher cost.

Features: HPE Zerto Software is notable for efficient data protection, real-time data replication, and seamless integration. Cloud Rewind offers automation capabilities, multi-cloud backup, and reliable scheduling options, particularly appealing to enterprises in varied cloud environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cloud Rewind is recognized for straightforward deployment, minimal setup issues, and effective customer support. HPE Zerto Software also provides reliable customer service, but deployment can be longer due to extensive integration needs.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Zerto Software presents competitive setup costs with a good ROI from efficient recovery solutions. Cloud Rewind may have higher initial costs but shows significant ROI due to its comprehensive features that deliver long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Backup Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,053 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloud Rewind (formerly Appr...

Ranking in Cloud Backup

37th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SaaS Backup (22nd)

HPE Zerto Software

Ranking in Cloud Backup

3rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

341

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Migration (2nd), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Cloud Rewind (formerly Appranix) is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Zerto Software is 4.1%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

reviewer1370448

Ecosystem Solution Architect Lead for UK, Ireland, Arfica at Accenture

Provides operational efficiencies and recovers virtual instances quickly

For our clients, we use the solution to protect their virtual instances and instantly recover them in the event of a compromise The solution has provided operational efficiencies. The platform's most effective feature is quickly recovering virtual instances into a separate environment. They…

Read full review

Sachin Vinay

Assistant Manager-Networks at Amrita

Leverage disaster recovery with reliable support and cost-effective future-proof features

Zerto is straightforward to implement because it only requires the installation of an agent on the VMs designated for migration. A service, typically a VM, must also be deployed at the disaster recovery location. This entire process is simple and can be completed within three days. Zerto's near-synchronous replication occurs every minute, allowing for highly granular recovery points. This means that even if interruptions or malware disruptions occur within that minute, Zerto can restore to the last known good state, effectively recovering the entire setup to the latest backup. This capability ensures high data security and minimizes potential data loss. One of the main benefits of implementing Zerto is its data compression, which significantly reduces the load on our IPsec VPN. Zerto compresses data by 80 percent before transmitting it across the VPN, minimizing the data transferred between geographically dispersed locations. This compression and subsequent decompression at the destination alleviate the strain on the VPN, preventing overload and ensuring efficient data synchronization. Zerto simplifies malware protection by integrating it into its disaster recovery and synchronization features. This comprehensive approach eliminates the need for separate antivirus setups in virtual machines and applications. It streamlines our security measures and removes the need for additional software or solutions, resulting in an excellent return on investment. Zerto's single-click recovery solution offers exceptional recovery speed. Through the user interface, a single click allows for a complete restoration from the most recent backup within two to three minutes, enabling rapid recovery and minimal downtime. Zerto's Recovery Time Objective is excellent. In the past, if a virtual machine crashed, we would recover it from a snapshot, which could take one to two hours. With Zerto, the recovery process takes only five minutes, and users are typically unaware of any disruption. This allows us to restore everything quickly and efficiently. Zerto has significantly reduced our downtime. When malware affects our data, Zerto immediately notifies us and helps us protect other applications, even those not yet implemented with Zerto. By monitoring these applications, we can quickly identify and address any potential malware spread, minimizing downtime across our systems. Zerto significantly reduces downtime and associated costs during disruptions. Our services are unified, so in the event of a disruption without Zerto, even a half-day disruption would necessitate offline procedures. This would lead to increased manpower, service delays, and substantial financial losses due to interrupted admissions and other critical processes. By unifying service processes, Zerto minimizes the impact of outages. Zerto streamlines our disaster recovery testing across multiple locations by enabling efficient failover testing without disrupting live services. Traditionally, DR testing required downtime of critical systems, but Zerto's replication and failover capabilities allow us to test in parallel with live operations. This non-disruptive approach ensures continuous service availability while validating our DR plan, even in scenarios like malware attacks, by creating a separate testing environment that mirrors the live setup. This comprehensive testing provides confidence in our ability to handle real-world incidents effectively. This saves us over 60 percent of the time. Zerto streamlines system administration tasks by automating many processes, thereby reducing the workload for multiple administrators. This allows them to focus on other university services that require attention and effectively reallocate support resources from automated tasks to those requiring more dedicated management. Zerto is used exclusively for our critical services, providing up to a 70 percent improvement in our IT resilience.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform's most effective feature is quickly recovering virtual instances into a separate environment."

"Files can also be extracted from the VMDK at the remote site even when the VM is off."

"The ease of use is one of the most valuable features when it comes to making changes and configuring. It's very easy to set up and configure. It's a great product."

"It is convenient to use because the API allows for seamless integration when performing our day-to-day operations."

"Zerto saved us close to 90% on DR testing compared to traditional backups and restores."

"I find Zerto's ability to restore a virtual VM much more quickly than Veeam or vCenter's restoration capabilities to be incredibly valuable."

"The file restoration is very helpful. They've improved it over the years to make it a lot more user-friendly and easy to do, which I appreciate. So, we use that quite a bit. The failover process is quite simple and intuitive. Even the configuration and setup are pretty easy to do. It is pretty easy to use. I've done the restoration of servers several times, not as a disaster. When an upgrade on a server goes wrong and it messes things up, I can just fail back to a previous version and try it again. So, that has been really helpful."

"We have saved time in a data recovery situation."

"I've found the migration feature very valuable."

More HPE Zerto Software pros

Cons

"They could add more intelligence features in the workflow through automation."

"If we could integrate our AIOps solutions and incident management capabilities within HPE Zerto Software, that would be beneficial."

"We have discontinued using HPE Zerto Software."

"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was that it was really expensive."

"The performance was generally good, but occasional lag disrupted the flow, leaving room for improvement."

"Zerto could add text alerts if there are critical problems and alerts if changes affect our replication."

"My experience deploying the HPE Zerto Software involves some initial setup hurdles."

"The mission critical apps, like the ERP system or any casino software, are areas that I always hope to improve."

"The only negative I would give is that with the latest version of the appliance, setting up authentication was a bit of a challenge, but that is just a matter of using Keycloak and how things have changed."

More HPE Zerto Software cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The additional cost is cloud storage, which the public cloud provider charges."

"We believe the pricing, setup costs, and licensing are easy to understand. The pricing seems very reasonable."

"If you are an IT person and you think that DR is too expensive then the cloud option from Zerto is good because anyone can afford to use it, as far as getting one or two of their criticals protected."

"It's very equitable, otherwise you wouldn't do it. It's something that we utilize for the licenses per core as far as what we're backing up. Therefore, it's very cost-efficient as far as the licensing goes. For the amount of stuff that we're backing up and what we're utilizing it for, the licensing is not very expensive at all."

"Pricing is one area where there could be some improvement. We would like to see a consumption model that would charge in a DR scenario, where you're failing over and consuming those resources, instead of a per-protected-node model. Or it could be a model based on the amount of storage space you're protecting."

"As far as I know, the pricing is around $1,000 per VM, but Zerto is changing the pricing model to more of an enterprise-class license. I don't know if there are any additional costs or fees."

"It is less expensive than the full solution that we had previously, but at the same time, it's not an inexpensive product either."

"Zerto is priced high."

"You are getting what you pay for, as this is a solution that requires minimal management after it is configured."

More HPE Zerto Software pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Appranix Cloud Application Resilience?

I rate the product pricing a seven. The additional cost is cloud storage, which the public cloud provider charges.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Appranix Cloud Application Resilience?

They could add more intelligence features in the workflow through automation, removing more of the human element. Additionally, improvements in the reporting features would be beneficial.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Appranix Cloud Application Resilience?

For our clients, we use the solution to protect their virtual instances and instantly recover them in the event of a compromise.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zerto?

Its ability to roll back if the VM or the server that you are recovering does not come up right is also valuable. You have the ability to roll back a few seconds or a few minutes. The rollback feat...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

Regarding my experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing, I think on the pricing side, I don't generally deal with it, but from what I hear from my finance team, it's somewhat on the higher...

See all answers

Comparisons

Clumio vs Cloud Rewind (formerly Appranix)

Compared 42% of the time

More Cloud Rewind (formerly Appranix) Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 13% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 9% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 9% of the time

Rubrik vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 6% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 6% of the time

More HPE Zerto Software Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

July 2025

Download Cloud Rewind (formerly Appranix) product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software

July 2025

Download HPE Zerto Software product report

Also Known As

No data available

Zerto Virtual Replication

Overview

Cloud Rewind (formerly Appranix) offers organizations reliable protection and recovery solutions, catering to complex business continuity needs. Its comprehensive features support system resilience and integrity, making it ideal for experienced IT professionals seeking robust data management capabilities.

Cloud Rewind enables streamlined data protection and disaster recovery processes. Designed to simplify backup and recovery tasks, it automates policies across multi-cloud environments, safeguarding data against disruptions. With its user-centric design, it provides businesses with the confidence to manage their cloud-based data securely, providing a seamless integration into existing IT infrastructures while maintaining efficiency.

What are the key features of Cloud Rewind?

Automated Disaster Recovery: Facilitates quick recovery with predefined plans, reducing downtime.
Multi-Cloud Support: Integrates smoothly with multiple cloud platforms for synchronized data management.
Policy Automation: Automates backup and recovery tasks based on user-defined rules, enhancing reliability.
Customized Alerts: Notifies users promptly of any issues, helping maintain operational continuity.

What benefits and ROI are expected from Cloud Rewind?

Reduced Downtime: Minimizes disruptions with rapid restoration strategies, enhancing productivity.
Cost Efficiency: Lowers operational costs by optimizing backup processes and resource allocation.
Scalability: Adapts to organizational growth, ensuring consistent data protection irrespective of size.
Enhanced Security: Offers robust data protection that helps mitigate risks associated with data loss.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail use Cloud Rewind to ensure critical data is protected and easily recoverable, addressing stringent compliance demands. Its deployment in these sectors exemplifies its adaptability and relevance in safeguarding sensitive information across demanding environments.

Commvault

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Zerto acquired by HPE

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Commvault, Zerto acquired by HPE and others in Cloud Backup. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.