Cloud Elements vs webMethods.io comparison

Cloud Elements and IBM are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Cloud Elements is ranked #42, while IBM is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1. Cloud Elements holds a 0.2% mindshare in PaaS, compared to IBM’s 8.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cloud Elements users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Cloud Elements

35 Views
12 Comparison Views

webMethods.io

Read 92 webMethods.io reviews

1,867 Views
649 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Cloud Elements

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cloud Elements and webMethods.io based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS).

To learn more, read our detailed Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloud Elements

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

42nd

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), API Management (9th), Cloud Data Integration (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Cloud Elements is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 8.6%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Use Cloud Elements?

Share your opinion

MohanPrasad

Senior Consultant at Brillio

Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost

webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

June 2025

Download Cloud Elements product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

May 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

Cloud Elements is a cloud API integration platform that enables developers to publish, integrate, aggregate and manage all of their APIs through a unified platform. Using Cloud Elements, developers can quickly connect entire categories of cloud services (e.g., CRM, Documents, Finance) using uniform APIs or simply synchronize data between multiple cloud services (e.g. Salesforce, Zendesk and Quickbooks) using it’s innovative integration toolkit.

Cloud Elements

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Influitive, Namely, Sage, Avalara, BrightTalk, Act-On, CustomerGauge, Kissmetrics

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

June 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.