Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Claude for Enterprise vs Cohere comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Claude for Enterprise
Ranking in AI Writing Tools
7th
Ranking in Large Language Models (LLMs)
5th
Ranking in AI Proofreading Tools
5th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.1
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
AI-Powered Chatbots (7th), AI Code Assistants (6th)
Cohere
Ranking in AI Writing Tools
9th
Ranking in Large Language Models (LLMs)
6th
Ranking in AI Proofreading Tools
8th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
AI Development Platforms (19th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the AI Writing Tools category, the mindshare of Claude for Enterprise is 7.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cohere is 1.6%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Writing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Claude for Enterprise7.2%
Cohere1.6%
Other91.2%
AI Writing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Nishant Thakkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Data visualization and workflow efficiency improve with automated features
I do not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer, and I was not offered a gift card or incentive for this review. We use other tech products such as Microsoft Excel and Slack. We can use my real name when publishing my review, along with my real company name. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Claude an 8.
Gokul Anil - PeerSpot reviewer
Has streamlined test creation and analysis while needing better semantic accuracy for specific domain knowledge
Cohere is very useful because I have been in scenarios where code was written with multiple reusable concepts containing many functionalities covered as different functions, but without descriptions of what particular functions were doing. We used Cohere intelligence and its knowledge on Oracle ERP PPM, and it was able to read through all the TypeScript code and create descriptions intelligently, which were almost 90% correct when reviewed. It was very useful because we had 500-plus reusables, and it was able to analyze all of them and put them into a catalog. This makes it very easy to find and use the catalog to determine whether existing functionality is already implemented, preventing redundant implementations. When it creates a new test, it creates it almost 70 to 80% correctly without errors. The time savings are significant - what previously took one or two days can now be completed in two to three hours maximum. We can complete many more tests in a day or sprint with Cohere's help. Along with test automation, we handle analysis tasks, and now we have more time for better analysis. We are planning to implement test analysis capabilities as well. Once you receive the requirements and test cases, you can directly use them as input, and it will generate all artifacts and test data.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Claude saves me significant time when conducting research or writing quick Python scripts."
"Claude has positively impacted my organization, as evident from the metrics which show productivity doubling and turnaround time being cut in half."
"Overall, I rate Claude nine out of ten."
"Cohere has positively impacted my organization by helping our customers work more efficiently when creating requests, and the embedding results are of very high quality."
"A key advantage of integrating Cohere’s reranking model is that it aligns with client requests to include a reranking module — a widely recognized method for improving RAG quality. Additionally, the API demonstrates strong performance in terms of response speed."
"When it creates a new test, it creates it almost 70 to 80% correctly without errors; the time savings are significant—what previously took one or two days can now be completed in two to three hours maximum."
"The very first thing that I really like about it is the support team. They're really available on Discord, and they answer all of your questions."
 

Cons

"The foundational model would have to be improved to be comparable to ChatGPT for everyday use cases."
"The product could be improved by offering automatic integration with other solutions, such as the ability to read Excel or text files and automate processes this way."
"It's challenging for us to make a conclusion about quality enhancement by using reranking models, as solid evaluation methodology for reranking is still immature."
"I believe Cohere can be improved technically by providing more feedback, logs, and metrics for embedding requests, as it currently appears to be a black box without any understanding of quality."
"Cohere has text generation. I think it is mainly focused on AI search. If there was a way to combine the searches with images, I think it would be nice to include that."
"When performing similarity matching between text descriptions and the catalog descriptions created using Cohere, the matching could be improved."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Writing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
872,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
University
7%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Claude?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was straightforward without running into major challenges.
What needs improvement with Claude?
I face issues with Claude halting or hallucinating occasionally, as it happens with some projects but not all.
What is your primary use case for Claude?
I use Claude, particularly its artifact features, for data visualization. On a weekly basis, we create newsletters for our clients that require beautiful and good-looking presentations, particularl...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cohere?
I'm not in the position to answer that question because I was not the one who deployed that model, but I believe it is because we see the model name as ARN name, so it's most likely coming from Bed...
What needs improvement with Cohere?
It would be better to have a dashboard for users to showcase how reranking helps improve quality. When end users choose the service, they want to see the actual output. The evaluation part is chall...
What is your primary use case for Cohere?
We founded this company two and a half years ago, and since the middle of 2022, we foresaw the trending of generative AI and large language models, so my startup is working on developing generative...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Claude for Enterprise vs. Cohere and other solutions. Updated: October 2025.
872,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.