Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs HPE NonStop comparison

Cisco and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Cisco is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.0. Cisco holds a 2.4% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers

Read 8 Cisco UCS E-Series Servers reviews

292 Views
120 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE NonStop

Read 12 HPE NonStop reviews

844 Views
286 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers

HPE NonStop

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

HPE NonStop and Cisco UCS E-Series Servers compete in the enterprise server space. HPE NonStop excels in environments demanding high availability and fault tolerance, while Cisco UCS E-Series Servers are superior in scalability and integration.

Features: HPE NonStop is notable for its continuous operation, fault tolerance, and high reliability. It also offers unparalleled availability with its self-healing design. Cisco UCS E-Series Servers provide strong integration with Cisco infrastructures, notable compute power, and efficient virtualization support.

Room for Improvement: HPE NonStop could improve in deployment complexity, cost-effectiveness, and flexibility in non-mission critical scenarios. Cisco UCS E-Series could enhance their heat management, hardware resilience over time, and initial role-out learning curve.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE NonStop requires significant planning for deployment, but offers comprehensive customer support for mission-critical scenarios. Cisco UCS E-Series Servers provide a more streamlined deployment process and customer service geared towards rapid integration and efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: HPE NonStop involves higher upfront costs due to its advanced features, offering high ROI in critical uptime settings. Cisco UCS E-Series Servers are a more cost-effective initial investment, providing strong ROI related to scalability and integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs. HPE NonStop Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs. HPE NonStop

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers

Ranking in Blade Servers

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE NonStop

Ranking in Blade Servers

8th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS E-Series Servers is 2.4%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE NonStop is 3.9%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

DavidMbugua

Group General Manager-ICT at SkyLink

Stable product with efficient security features

We use Cisco UCS E-Series Servers to host enterprise systems The product's most valuable features are stability, speed, and scalability. We rarely encounter downtime issues, and it has an expandable memory storage. Additionally, it blends well with Cisco's security tools. The platform's pricing…

Read full review

Roni Wijaya

Vice President of It Operations at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

With a perfect record for uptime, the solution ensures a return on investment

Since it is a legacy tool, there is a need to change it for flexibility. I think now it has improved because the security is very good. It is very secure for the performance of the machine critical application service, and it is very good. I don't know how to speak more on improvement needed because it's a good enough tool. However, depending on the application, it's limited. Not a lot of applications run on HPE NonStop. It is not flexible because I know that because of the compatibility of Java with HPE NonStop. When we are using Java, the performance is not good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cisco has better visibility and manageability for disaster recovery."

"Stability-wise, it is a good product that remains stable."

"The product is overall stable."

"The product's most valuable features are stability, speed, and scalability."

"They are really easy to maintain. I've added RAM to them. I've done a lot of other things with the virtualization."

"The most valuable features are that they are efficient and easy to setup."

"The Cisco chassis is very easy to configure and any network engineer or expert can configure the solution and easily integrate it with the chassis."

"The server management and automation capabilities have been outstanding in automation, greatly benefiting our IT team."

"Feature-wise, the most valuable one is the fact that it has 100 hundred percent uptime every year. Secondly, it is stable."

"The stability of HPE NonStop is good."

"We don't have any issues with the stability of HPE NonStop."

Cons

"It is not a solution that is cloud ready."

"I would like to see improvements in VMware integration with Cisco, especially in terms of documentation and integration tools. Support of NVIDIA integration would also make it better."

"The tool must be made compatible with multi-vendor ecosystems."

"The processing capacity could be improved."

"The platform's pricing needs improvement. There could be more collaborative tools included."

"One thing that could be improved is the cost - it is very high for this Blade chassis as compared to other vendors. Especially in Asia. Asian customers mostly prefer a cost effective, cheaper solution."

"The biggest pain point for us is the matrix for the firmware upgrades. It is a pain. You look at that thing, you might as well be reading Greek. It would be a whole lot better if they could clean up their documentation on it."

"The product should also be available in a standard edition or a standard license since currently there is a need to pay for an extra license, which is very expensive, especially when considering the budgeting part of our company."

"It would be helpful if they brought the price down."

"HPE NonStop could improve by having infrastructure management."

"It is not flexible...Not a lot of applications run on HPE NonStop."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a need to pay towards the licensing costs of the solution. The most expensive server from Cisco is Cisco UCS B-Series."

"The solution is expensive."

"The pricing of the solution is reasonable. From a commercial point of view, the prices are okay."

"The product is expensive."

"It's expensive, they are quite pricey."

"The price of the solution is too high. If they lowered the price substantially it would open up more opportunities. It's considered a replacement for the old 9000 boxes of HP. If it had a lower price, we would be able to compete in the financial, and other sectors and other solutions such as Terraform. Having a high price makes other solutions more attractive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."

"HPE NonStop is definitely on the higher end."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

23%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS E-Series Servers?

The product's most valuable features are stability, speed, and scalability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS E-Series Servers?

The product is expensive. I rate its pricing a five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS E-Series Servers?

The platform's pricing needs improvement. There could be more collaborative tools included.

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE NonStop?

Feature-wise, the most valuable one is the fact that it has 100 hundred percent uptime every year. Secondly, it is stable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE NonStop?

It is an expensive solution. On a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the pricing an eight. The licensing is based on a yearly basis, but we buy for a mi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE NonStop?

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco UCS B-Series vs Cisco UCS E-Series Servers

Compared 45% of the time

Supermicro SuperBlade vs Cisco UCS E-Series Servers

Compared 32% of the time

HPE Synergy vs Cisco UCS E-Series Servers

Compared 23% of the time

More Cisco UCS E-Series Servers Competitors

HPE Superdome X vs HPE NonStop

Compared 42% of the time

Dell PowerEdge M vs HPE NonStop

Compared 27% of the time

Fujitsu CX1000 vs HPE NonStop

Compared 16% of the time

HPE Synergy vs HPE NonStop

Compared 15% of the time

More HPE NonStop Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers

April 2025

Download Cisco UCS E-Series Servers product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE NonStop

April 2025

Download HPE NonStop product report

Also Known As

UCS E-Series Servers

HP NonStop, HPE Integrity NonStop

Overview

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers are next-generation, power-optimized, x86, Intel Xeon 64-bit blade servers designed to be deployed in Cisco Integrated Services Routers Generation 2 (ISR G2) and the Cisco 4451-X ISR. These price-to-performance-optimized single-socket blade servers balance simplicity, performance, reliability, and power efficiency. They are well suited for applications and infrastructure services typically deployed in small offices and branch offices.

Cisco

When availability matters, the new HPE Integrity NonStop X enables you to stay ahead of your competition by mitigating the risk of downtime and effortlessly meeting your business processing, OLTP, and database requirements all with an industry-standard x86 architecture. HPE brings you an unparalleled portfolio of HPE Integrity NonStop systems the NonStop i family and the NonStop X family. These systems deliver the highest level of availability for the most-demanding, high-value workloads and customer-facing applications.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Navaho, MiroNet AG, Columbia Sportswear

Bankart, Capital Securities Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs. HPE NonStop

April 2025

Free Report: Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs. HPE NonStop

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs. HPE NonStop and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs. HPE NonStop report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.