Cisco UCS Director vs CloudBolt comparison

Read 9 CloudBolt reviews

2,533 Views
2,178 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Director

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CloudBolt and Cisco UCS Director compete in the cloud management and data center automation landscape. Data indicates that CloudBolt has more favorable pricing and support, while Cisco UCS Director justifies its higher cost with a superior feature set.

Features: CloudBolt offers seamless integrations, self-service portals, and robust multi-cloud management capabilities. Cisco UCS Director provides comprehensive automation capabilities, extensive data center management tools, and exceptional integration with Cisco solutions.

Room for Improvement: CloudBolt can enhance its deep customization options, expand its feature set to compete with enterprise-level tools, and improve its user interface for better usability. Cisco UCS Director could improve its ease of use, offer better support for non-Cisco environments, and enhance its pricing model to be more competitive.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudBolt is known for its straightforward deployment and efficient customer support, making it ideal for organizations seeking quick implementation. Cisco UCS Director has a complex deployment process tailored for larger enterprises, with in-depth technical support.

Pricing and ROI: CloudBolt is perceived as cost-effective with a compelling ROI due to lower setup costs and rapid deployment benefits. Cisco UCS Director involves higher initial expenses but offers long-term savings and optimized data center performance that justify its ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Director vs. CloudBolt Report (Updated: June 2026).

Cisco UCS Director vs. CloudBolt

Download the complete report

Helped 902,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Director

Ranking in Cloud Management

26th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CloudBolt

Ranking in Cloud Management

21st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Cost Management (33rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Director is 1.7%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudBolt is 1.8%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CloudBolt	1.8%
Cisco UCS Director	1.7%
Other	96.5%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

ErnieRumfield

Senior Telecommunications Engineer at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Managing extensive VoIP services becomes efficient and seamless

We use Cisco UCS Director primarily for managing our VoIP service to maintain seamless service delivery. We operate in an enterprise government environment Cisco UCS Director is straightforward to use, which we greatly appreciate. It helps save time by making it quicker to roll out new call…

Read full review

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Centralized self-service has unified hybrid clouds and has improved governance and cost control

The best features CloudBolt offers include governance and policy control, allowing security teams to set up their specific guardrails with governance at scale. Multi or hybrid cloud abstraction provides a single pane of glass for different types of environments, and self-service catalogs enable technical or business users to request services without multiple tickets. CloudBolt also offers strong integration capabilities that work well with existing tools without disrupting the current environment. From an integration standpoint, CloudBolt works well with various public and private cloud providers, including AWS, Azure, GCP, VMware, and Nutanix, as well as different virtualization software, infrastructure as code templates such as Ansible and Terraform, ITSM tools such as ServiceNow, and CMDB platforms. CloudBolt has positively impacted my organization by managing multiple cloud environments for thousands of users with a complex enterprise workflow that has helped reduce man-hours required for provisioning resources. We have achieved faster delivery through standardized operating procedures and reduced reworks due to automation. The chargeback and showback mechanisms allow us to charge different business units according to their consumption, providing better governance, lower risk, and lower cost, resulting in a good return on investment. Since using CloudBolt, I have seen a 25 to 30 percent reduction in service delivery time and an improvement in efficiency of almost 20 to 25 percent within a timeframe of approximately 8 to 10 months.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main feature of this solution is the integration with all the Cisco solutions and other vendors."

"Better visibility and better control are the main benefits people receive from Cisco UCS Director; the automation and the orchestration part, these three to four points are the key factors to decide on Cisco UCS Director."

"The reason we went with Cisco is that it comes at a very negligible cost as part of the BOQ. Compared to the competition's products, which are incredibly expensive, UCS Director is low-cost."

"UCS director enables us to be more productive and more agile, and also more self-sufficient because we don't have to depend on anybody else."

"Without UCS Director it wouldn't be possible for us to go from receiving shipments at a data center to having systems live in production in a matter of days, or sometimes hours, instead of waiting weeks."

"The solution is helpful for centralized management."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the fabric sharing."

More Cisco UCS Director pros

"CloudBolt has very good stability; we tested everything on the platform, and it was very good, so we started a partnership with them."

"CloudBolt's ease of use, coupled with our initial focus on fully automating infrastructure deployment, has won accolades from our internal stakeholders."

"The product takes care of a hybrid cloud environment and it helps me maintain control and insight across various cloud platforms."

"Role-based access control and application blueprinting."

"Since using CloudBolt, I have seen a 25 to 30 percent reduction in service delivery time and an improvement in efficiency of almost 20 to 25 percent within a timeframe of approximately 8 to 10 months."

"We were able to save enough from reduced support cost associated with maintaining and operating our previous cloud management platform within months to pay for CloudBolt."

"The solution's biggest advantage is flexibility"

"The initial deployment was super easy."

More CloudBolt pros

Cons

"I would like to see more integration with other solutions."

"The product could allow more programmatic opportunities through better development of the API."

"The product's pricing needs to improve."

"Normally, UCS Director is used primarily for orchestration, but when we look at a non-Cisco data infrastructure components, the UCS Director needs a bit more improvement in terms of integration with third-party systems and with existing older systems."

"There are a lot of bugs in the solution. This is an area in the solution that can be improved."

"The scalability of this solution needs to be improved because as it is now, you cannot scale the storage alone. Rather, you have to scale the storage and the compute together."

"There could be an improvement with the integration with the newest solutions from other vendors' technologies."

"The solution could be improved is including a feature where I could do things programmatically versus having to create workarounds to get what I want to get done."

More Cisco UCS Director cons

"The management of SaaS must be improved."

"The solution is not easy to use. It's not intuitive enough to click anywhere in the solution and make it work."

"To improve CloudBolt, I believe the user experience needs enhancement as some users find it somewhat dated compared to newer cloud management platforms."

"For improvements, I would say that they could maybe increase the number of integrations and add more out-of-the-box work flows and possibly a new or improved user interface."

"I had an issue with the scheduling feature of CloudBolt, but I'm not sure if that's been fixed in the new version."

"We did find it was a bit challenging to scale horizontally behind a load balancer in an active/active configuration."

"Support for containers is basic and needs improvement."

"The scheduling feature of CloudBolt needs improvement because sometimes, it doesn't work."

More CloudBolt cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cisco UCS Director is expensive...I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing around five to six out of ten."

"The budget doesn’t work for the state and local governments."

"I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The cost of this solution is significant."

"I rate Cisco UCS Director's price a three out of ten. Cisco UCS Director is not an affordable product. With Cisco UCS Director, there is a need to pay an overall price, which consists of the product, software, and support."

"I rate the pricing an eight out of ten because the solution is expensive."

"The system is cheaper if a customer has fewer servers since you pay by the node."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Director?

While the pricing might be seen as expensive, it provides value for money due to reliable service and excellent technical support.

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Director?

It should be more of a cloud-based architecture for Cisco UCS Director, and it should be affordable to small customers as well because the pricing is a major challenge when we talk about Cisco UCS ...

What is your primary use case for Cisco UCS Director?

Mainly in my region and country, large data center customers are using Cisco UCS Director, not the SMB or mid-market customers. More of the on-premise customers are utilizing Cisco UCS Director. Th...

What needs improvement with CloudBolt?

To improve CloudBolt, I believe the user experience needs enhancement as some users find it somewhat dated compared to newer cloud management platforms. From a telemetry and analytics perspective, ...

What is your primary use case for CloudBolt?

My main use case for CloudBolt includes having a centralized self-service provisioning and orchestration, allowing me to manage hybrid and multi-cloud provisioning across AWS, Azure, GCP, VMware, a...

What advice do you have for others considering CloudBolt?

For others looking into using CloudBolt, I advise defining governance policies early, focusing on building modular automation, and planning integrations in advance, such as IAM, CMDB, or security a...

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Director

Comparisons

Compared 12% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 12% of the time

Abiquo vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 6% of the time

Spacelift vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 5% of the time

OpenNebula vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco UCS Director Competitors

Morpheus vs CloudBolt

Compared 9% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs CloudBolt

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudBolt

Compared 7% of the time

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs CloudBolt

Compared 7% of the time

Densify vs CloudBolt

Compared 6% of the time

More CloudBolt Competitors

Product Reports

Cisco UCS Director

Download Cisco UCS Director product report

Download CloudBolt product report

Overview

Cisco UCS Director simplifies centralized management with a user-friendly interface, focusing on multi-cloud management, integration, and strong API support. It aims to provide comprehensive control and visibility across diverse environments.

Renowned for ease of use and deployment, Cisco UCS Director offers automation and orchestration capabilities, enabling workflow generation in private and hybrid clouds. It allows centralized control of UCS blades, VoIP services, and infrastructure while facilitating upgrades and traffic management in large data centers. Users benefit from its capability for self-service provisioning and third-party product integration. Despite strengths, improvements in interface simplicity, scalability, third-party integration, and cloud-based architecture could enhance its appeal.

What are the most important features?

Multi-Cloud Management: Simplifies operations across different cloud environments.
Integration with Cisco Solutions: Ensures seamless connection within Cisco's ecosystem.
Strong API Support: Facilitates custom integrations and extensions.
Single Pane of Glass Manageability: Provides comprehensive visibility and control.
Automation and Orchestration: Streamlines processes and tasks efficiently.
Cost-Effectiveness: Supports budget-conscious operations without compromising functionality.
Security: Prioritizes data safety and network security.
Fabric Sharing: Improves resource utilization and flexibility.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies management tasks, reducing operational complexity.
Deployment Efficiency: Accelerates implementation across data centers.
Enhanced Visibility: Improves oversight of IT infrastructure.
Cost Management: Achieves savings through efficient resource utilization.
Scalability: Supports growth with adaptable infrastructure management.
Comprehensive Control: Centralizes control to enhance management.

IT organizations use Cisco UCS Director to automate and orchestrate deployments in diverse sectors, including telecommunications for VoIP service enhancement and in large data centers for infrastructure management. It supports web service apps, database integration, and facilitates upgrades, making it ideal for enterprises seeking streamlined processes and better resource management.

Cisco

CloudBolt provides ease of use, flexibility, and expandability through custom scripts and integration with platforms like AWS and Azure. It offers governance, deployment, and resource control, along with a self-service catalog and role-based access control, enhancing automated efficiency.

CloudBolt stands out for its automation, integration capabilities, and cost management while improving efficiency, reducing service delivery times, and offering dashboard flexibility. It utilizes predefined hooks and customization to optimize processes. Self-service options boost user autonomy in hybrid and multi-cloud environments, supporting policy-driven governance and infrastructure automation for ITSM platforms. Users employ it for cost visibility, role-based access control, and template creation, benefiting financial and government sectors.

What features make CloudBolt stand out?

Ease of Use: Simplifies deployment and management.
Flexibility: Customizable scripts and integrations.
Governance: Streamlines policy-driven controls.
Resource Control: Enhances allocation and management.
Automation: Utilizes predefined hooks for efficiency.
Integration: Broad compatibility with platforms like AWS, Azure.
Cost Management: Chargebacks and showbacks for visibility.

What benefits should organizations consider?

Efficiency Improvements: Boosts operational productivity.
Reduced Service Delivery Times: Speeds up task completion.
Comprehensive Reporting: Custom reports and dashboard flexibility.
Strong ROI: Enhances value with actionable insights.

In industries like finance and government, CloudBolt facilitates centralized provisioning and orchestration across AWS, Azure, and GCP. Users leverage its policy-driven governance and role-based access control to optimize cost and automate substantial IaaS infrastructure, supporting scheduling and blueprint templates for efficiency.

Sample Customers

Entel, Data#3, Cegal, NESIC, LightEdge

WM, CyWest, Panic, Camden, University of Maryland, Xerox, Neustar, Medidata, Continu, Aruba Networks, Neuberger Berman, Peak6, EverBank, Ascensus, Hosting Edge

Cisco UCS Director vs. CloudBolt