Cisco UCS Director vs CloudBolt comparison

Read 9 CloudBolt reviews

1,370 Views
1,206 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Director

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CloudBolt and Cisco UCS Director compete in the cloud management and data center automation landscape. Data indicates that CloudBolt has more favorable pricing and support, while Cisco UCS Director justifies its higher cost with a superior feature set.

Features: CloudBolt offers seamless integrations, self-service portals, and robust multi-cloud management capabilities. Cisco UCS Director provides comprehensive automation capabilities, extensive data center management tools, and exceptional integration with Cisco solutions.

Room for Improvement: CloudBolt can enhance its deep customization options, expand its feature set to compete with enterprise-level tools, and improve its user interface for better usability. Cisco UCS Director could improve its ease of use, offer better support for non-Cisco environments, and enhance its pricing model to be more competitive.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudBolt is known for its straightforward deployment and efficient customer support, making it ideal for organizations seeking quick implementation. Cisco UCS Director has a complex deployment process tailored for larger enterprises, with in-depth technical support.

Pricing and ROI: CloudBolt is perceived as cost-effective with a compelling ROI due to lower setup costs and rapid deployment benefits. Cisco UCS Director involves higher initial expenses but offers long-term savings and optimized data center performance that justify its ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Director vs. CloudBolt Report (Updated: March 2026).

Cisco UCS Director vs. CloudBolt

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Director

Ranking in Cloud Management

22nd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CloudBolt

Ranking in Cloud Management

18th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Cost Management (31st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Director is 2.0%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudBolt is 2.0%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CloudBolt	2.0%
Cisco UCS Director	2.0%
Other	96.0%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

ErnieRumfield

Senior Telecommunications Engineer at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Managing extensive VoIP services becomes efficient and seamless

We use Cisco UCS Director primarily for managing our VoIP service to maintain seamless service delivery. We operate in an enterprise government environment Cisco UCS Director is straightforward to use, which we greatly appreciate. It helps save time by making it quicker to roll out new call…

Read full review

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Centralized self-service has unified hybrid clouds and has improved governance and cost control

The best features CloudBolt offers include governance and policy control, allowing security teams to set up their specific guardrails with governance at scale. Multi or hybrid cloud abstraction provides a single pane of glass for different types of environments, and self-service catalogs enable technical or business users to request services without multiple tickets. CloudBolt also offers strong integration capabilities that work well with existing tools without disrupting the current environment. From an integration standpoint, CloudBolt works well with various public and private cloud providers, including AWS, Azure, GCP, VMware, and Nutanix, as well as different virtualization software, infrastructure as code templates such as Ansible and Terraform, ITSM tools such as ServiceNow, and CMDB platforms. CloudBolt has positively impacted my organization by managing multiple cloud environments for thousands of users with a complex enterprise workflow that has helped reduce man-hours required for provisioning resources. We have achieved faster delivery through standardized operating procedures and reduced reworks due to automation. The chargeback and showback mechanisms allow us to charge different business units according to their consumption, providing better governance, lower risk, and lower cost, resulting in a good return on investment. Since using CloudBolt, I have seen a 25 to 30 percent reduction in service delivery time and an improvement in efficiency of almost 20 to 25 percent within a timeframe of approximately 8 to 10 months.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cisco UCS Director is straightforward to use, which we greatly appreciate."

"This is a user-friendly solution that is very good and easy to use."

"The reason we went with Cisco is that it comes at a very negligible cost as part of the BOQ. Compared to the competition's products, which are incredibly expensive, UCS Director is low-cost."

"Better visibility and better control are the main benefits people receive from Cisco UCS Director; the automation and the orchestration part, these three to four points are the key factors to decide on Cisco UCS Director."

"I can manage multiple workloads whether it's on AWS, Azure, or on-premises. They can be managed by using the UCS Director."

"Feature-wise, the solution helps one to add multiple environments in one place...It is a scalable product."

"UCS director enables us to be more productive and more agile, and also more self-sufficient because we don't have to depend on anybody else."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the fabric sharing."

More Cisco UCS Director pros

"CloudBolt's ease of use, coupled with our initial focus on fully automating infrastructure deployment, has won accolades from our internal stakeholders."

"I find the self-service features valuable."

"Since using CloudBolt, I have seen a 25 to 30 percent reduction in service delivery time and an improvement in efficiency of almost 20 to 25 percent within a timeframe of approximately 8 to 10 months."

"The product takes care of a hybrid cloud environment and it helps me maintain control and insight across various cloud platforms."

"Customer Service: World class."

"CloudBolt has very good stability; we tested everything on the platform, and it was very good, so we started a partnership with them."

"We were able to save enough from reduced support cost associated with maintaining and operating our previous cloud management platform within months to pay for CloudBolt."

"The initial deployment was super easy."

More CloudBolt pros

Cons

"The product's pricing needs to improve."

"There could be an improvement with the integration with the newest solutions from other vendors' technologies."

"The scalability of this solution needs to be improved because as it is now, you cannot scale the storage alone. Rather, you have to scale the storage and the compute together."

"We cannot depend on this solution to manage all of the data center's infrastructure."

"The product could allow more programmatic opportunities through better development of the API."

"Normally, UCS Director is used primarily for orchestration, but when we look at non-Cisco data infrastructure components, the UCS Director needs a bit more improvement in terms of integration with third-party systems and with existing older systems."

"We cannot depend on this solution to manage all of the data center's infrastructure."

"The user interface could use improvement."

More Cisco UCS Director cons

"Support for containers is basic and needs improvement."

"The solution is not easy to use. It's not intuitive enough to click anywhere in the solution and make it work."

"The management of SaaS must be improved."

"To improve CloudBolt, I believe the user experience needs enhancement as some users find it somewhat dated compared to newer cloud management platforms."

"The scheduling feature of CloudBolt needs improvement because sometimes, it doesn't work."

"We did find it was a bit challenging to scale horizontally behind a load balancer in an active/active configuration."

"I had an issue with the scheduling feature of CloudBolt, but I'm not sure if that's been fixed in the new version."

"The area of integrating on-prem and cloud needs improvement."

More CloudBolt cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cisco UCS Director is expensive...I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing around five to six out of ten."

"The budget doesn’t work for the state and local governments."

"The cost of this solution is significant."

"I rate Cisco UCS Director's price a three out of ten. Cisco UCS Director is not an affordable product. With Cisco UCS Director, there is a need to pay an overall price, which consists of the product, software, and support."

"I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"The system is cheaper if a customer has fewer servers since you pay by the node."

"I rate the pricing an eight out of ten because the solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Marketing Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Director?

While the pricing might be seen as expensive, it provides value for money due to reliable service and excellent technical support.

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Director?

It should be more of a cloud-based architecture for Cisco UCS Director, and it should be affordable to small customers as well because the pricing is a major challenge when we talk about Cisco UCS ...

What is your primary use case for Cisco UCS Director?

Mainly in my region and country, large data center customers are using Cisco UCS Director, not the SMB or mid-market customers. More of the on-premise customers are utilizing Cisco UCS Director. Th...

What needs improvement with CloudBolt?

To improve CloudBolt, I believe the user experience needs enhancement as some users find it somewhat dated compared to newer cloud management platforms. From a telemetry and analytics perspective, ...

What is your primary use case for CloudBolt?

My main use case for CloudBolt includes having a centralized self-service provisioning and orchestration, allowing me to manage hybrid and multi-cloud provisioning across AWS, Azure, GCP, VMware, a...

What advice do you have for others considering CloudBolt?

For others looking into using CloudBolt, I advise defining governance policies early, focusing on building modular automation, and planning integrations in advance, such as IAM, CMDB, or security a...

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco UCS Director

Comparisons

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 11% of the time

Abiquo vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 6% of the time

OpenNebula vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Cloud Director vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 5% of the time

More Cisco UCS Director Competitors

Morpheus vs CloudBolt

Compared 19% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs CloudBolt

Compared 10% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs CloudBolt

Compared 7% of the time

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs CloudBolt

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudBolt

Compared 6% of the time

More CloudBolt Competitors

Product Reports

Cisco UCS Director

Download Cisco UCS Director product report

Download CloudBolt product report

Overview

Cisco UCS Director enables automated delivery of physical and virtual data center resources, empowering data centers to move at the speed of business.

Cisco

CloudBolt supports a variety of cloud technologies, from on-premises virtualization and private cloud to a wide range public and hybrid cloud configurations.

No need to rip-and-replace. CloudBolt provides easy import, syncing, and management of legacy deployments even as it helps you build out new cloud environments.

CloudBolt lets administrators create and maintain configuration standards while developing a reusable library of service and application templates.

Sample Customers

Entel, Data#3, Cegal, NESIC, LightEdge

WM, CyWest, Panic, Camden, University of Maryland, Xerox, Neustar, Medidata, Continu, Aruba Networks, Neuberger Berman, Peak6, EverBank, Ascensus, Hosting Edge

Cisco UCS Director vs. CloudBolt