"As compared to the other major vendors in the SD-WAN market, such as VeloCloud, Cisco, and others, the tunnel-free and secure vector routing technology is its major USP, which gives plenty of room to discuss with the customer why IPSec from 1998 is a bit outdated."
"Cisco SD-WAN is a highly stable solution."
"Cisco SD-WAN is a stable solution."
"The deployment is quite simple and straightforward."
"Installation is easy."
"Load balancing is a feature that allows us to take the best of our links and distribute the load intelligently, always with an eye on the end-customer experience."
"Any technical support we needed was great."
"The user experience is pretty good."
"You get security, all of the service you need, and it's easy to deploy."
"The most valuable feature of FatPipe SD-WAN is it's based on SD-WAN technology."
"The UI of the SSR conductor is the main part where improvements can be done. Today, for every configuration step, you have to do a series of clicks. What we are missing there are wizards. For example, I have two applications, and I want one application to be prioritized against the other. In such a case, a wizard for assigning policies to a service without configuring each step by hand would be very helpful. There should be an overhaul of the GUI of the conductor. The functionality they have got in the Mist portal should be baked into the conductor itself. It would be really great, but as we all know, that won't happen."
"Compresson deduplication should be added."
"Customers require features that are secure for endpoints, on-premises, and for the cloud."
"The Cisco way of thinking is to create umbrella-like solutions. I would prefer it if this solution was separate from the entire monstrous Cisco portfolio."
"We don't have any issues with this solution other than the price."
"Cisco products are a little bit complicated, so making them a little bit easier would be an improvement."
"I would like to see features related to security compliance, including a view of compliance with standards. With this, I should be able to do an audit of my network with SDWAN."
"The solution needs to be more flexible around legacy devices."
"Since Cisco acquired Viptela, the stability of this solution has given problems since it is quite new."
"FatPipe SD-WAN can improve the price to scale the solution."
Earn 20 points
Cisco SD-WAN is ranked 2nd in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 43 reviews while FatPipe SD-WAN is ranked 19th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 1 review. Cisco SD-WAN is rated 8.0, while FatPipe SD-WAN is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco SD-WAN writes "Stable, cutting-edge, and robust". On the other hand, the top reviewer of FatPipe SD-WAN writes "Beneficial technology, reliable, and simple deployment". Cisco SD-WAN is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Versa FlexVNF, VMware SD-WAN, Meraki SD-WAN and Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall, whereas FatPipe SD-WAN is most compared with VMware SD-WAN and Fortinet FortiGate.
See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.
We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.