Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

Cisco and Kaseya are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Cisco is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.1, while Kaseya is ranked #58 with an average rating of 8.0. Cisco holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to Kaseya’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Kaseya users who would recommend it.

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabri...

Read 26 Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) reviews

1,291 Views
1,239 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Kaseya Traverse

Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews

961 Views
788 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabri...

Kaseya Traverse

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller and Kaseya Traverse compete in the network management space. Kaseya Traverse appears to have the upper hand due to its competitive pricing and customer service advantages.

Features: Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller includes features such as management of admin VDCs on Nexus switches, in-depth automation capabilities, and integration with security departments, offering broad network visibility and stability. Kaseya Traverse provides a consolidated dashboard for efficient network management, offering scalability and effective troubleshooting. Its processing capabilities support a wide range of devices and deliver comprehensive customer visibility across multiple environments.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller requires easier setup and configuration, improved integration with third-party tools, and better reporting, with its high cost often noted as a limitation. Kaseya Traverse could benefit from enhanced reporting, a comprehensive Service Map, and stronger integration capabilities. The lack of a CMDB and AI features are also identified as areas for development.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller supports primarily on-premises and private cloud deployments, with mixed reviews concerning the quality of technical support. Some users report delays with issue resolution. Kaseya Traverse offers hybrid and public cloud options, providing solid customer service although with certain gaps in developmental and operational support.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller is frequently cited as expensive, yet it delivers good value through extensive features supported by the reliable Nexus hardware, contributing to its ROI. Kaseya Traverse boasts a competitive pricing model, offering lower costs compared to other market alternatives. Despite some limitations, its affordability and functionality support satisfactory ROI for users.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs. Kaseya Traverse Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs. Kaseya Traverse

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabri...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Kaseya Traverse

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

58th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (35th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM)	0.7%
Kaseya Traverse	0.5%
Other	98.8%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Jagdev Dhaliwal

Network Engineer at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Flow monitoring has improved planning for east-west traffic and real-time capacity decisions

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) helps to understand the flows and data plane capacities, which are the primary use cases. Usually, people struggle with east-west traffic flow when they need to decide on firewalls or products. People typically understand north-south traffic flows but usually miss the east-west traffic flows in data centers. I was focusing more on this so that people can accordingly plan, such as after F5, the number of servers, the number of sessions needed, and whether we need to plan the interface for groups from the line capacity perspective. This kind of information was valuable to us. The real-time telemetry feature was beneficial. When experiencing performance issues, I could determine if there were any issues related to flows or areas where bottlenecks were occurring.

Read full review

AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN

Technical Consultant at a university with 11-50 employees

Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive

Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like that is easy to work on and straightforward."

"It uses push technology, which pushes the changes to all relevant devices to ensure they are updated accordingly."

"It has a very nice dashboard so you can see what's currently happening in the network and the performance of the back story."

"Automation of the ILS."

"The most valuable features of Cisco Data Center Network Manager are consistency and the core server. The teams have had a good experience."

"The product makes the management of our environment simpler."

"Stability is not an issue."

"I don't have to rely on the on-site engineer who can do the configuration. I can have our team just plug the devices and perform remotely. I can also do the templates."

More Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) pros

"Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly."

"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."

"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution."

"If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that."

"It's a simple and humble tool."

"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."

"Kaseya Traverse is a very stable solution and very sustainable in terms of what the market wants, what is out there, price-wise and functionality features. They're quite competitive and they are always innovating."

"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."

More Kaseya Traverse pros

Cons

"API lacks robustness."

"One of the biggest challenges is that we aren't always able to push the configuration onto the target device. Whenever this happens, we have to do a factory reset, put on the script, and then reconfigure it again. In the next release, I would like to have a troubleshooting feature."

"The tool should be more user-friendly and improve AI integration."

"I do not believe it integrated well with different infrastructures for hybrid environments."

"The tool's pricing strategy could be improved to compete more effectively in the market, especially against competitors like Huawei, Aruba, and Juniper."

"If the customer thinks about using additional solutions, Cisco should make sure they are not left out."

"It would be nice to have the ability to more easily collect information from other software when doing some types of analysis."

"Automation for the RMA process can be added."

More Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) cons

"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."

"Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us."

"Improvement is needed in making it cheaper."

"However, the issue lies in the adequacy of the responses to my questions, which are usually not up to par."

"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product."

"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."

"Dashboards and Central Protection were an issue. Also, database monitoring was not there. Even though they said that it was there at an additional cost, that tool was very basic. We couldn't have device configuration backup also."

"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."

More Kaseya Traverse cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Cisco Data Center Network Manager is expensive compared to other vendors on the market."

"On average, Data Center Network Manager's pricing isn't too costly unless you choose a premier license."

"The solution is very expensive."

"The tool is always expensive, but their service, product quality, and support are good. We're happy with it, but it's still an expensive solution. There are cheaper alternatives but no similar platform across all domains."

"The product is licensed with contracts that work on a yearly basis rather than a monthly model."

"I would say that the pricing offers great value for the money."

"When we purchase a Nexus box, the MDS CM license comes with it."

"We usually opt for a yearly plan, commonly for three or five years upfront. Some customers may not utilize all the features included in the product, and this can lead to them paying for functionalities they don't need."

"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."

"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco Data Center Network Manager?

It uses push technology, which pushes the changes to all relevant devices to ensure they are updated accordingly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Data Center Network Manager?

The tool is always expensive, but their service, product quality, and support are good. We're happy with it, but it's still an expensive solution. There are cheaper alternatives but no similar plat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Data Center Network Manager?

I do not believe it integrated well with different infrastructures for hybrid environments. I am uncertain because we have never attempted that in our environment, so they could perform better in t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kaseya Traverse?

The remote support and data collection features are great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaseya Traverse?

The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive. We pay an annual license fee. There are no additional fees associated with the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco DNA Center vs Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM)

Compared 45% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM)

Compared 14% of the time

Zabbix vs Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM)

Compared 14% of the time

SolarWinds Network Automation Manager vs Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM)

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM)

Compared 8% of the time

More Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) Competitors

PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 18% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 16% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 14% of the time

DX Performance Management vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 12% of the time

More Kaseya Traverse Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM)

January 2026

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) report

Download Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse

January 2026

Download Kaseya Traverse product report

Also Known As

Cisco Data Center Network Manager

No data available

Overview

The Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (NDFC) offers a comprehensive solution for managing Cisco NX-OS switches in hybrid-cloud environments, providing automation, visibility, and consistent operations. Designed to simplify and enhance data center management, NDFC integrates with Cisco Nexus Dashboard to streamline network connectivity, reduce deployment times, and ensure seamless transitions with minimal disruptions. Its modular architecture, new user interface, and support for non-Nexus OS platforms make it a robust tool for LAN, SAN, and IP Fabric for Media management. Additionally, NDFC enhances fabric reliability, automates workflows, and supports cloud connectivity with AWS and Microsoft Azure, making it ideal for businesses adapting to increasingly complex digital environments.

Cisco

Immediately identify impacted IT services using insights based on rich data analytics of events such as SNMP traps, Windows events and Syslogs. Resolve faults quickly via NetFlow enabled root cause analysis across cloud, on-premise, hybrid cloud and virtualized IT environments.

Kaseya

Sample Customers

Banco de Guayaquil, Cox Communications, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Roper St. Francis, University of British Columbia

UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs. Kaseya Traverse

December 2025

Free Report: Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs. Kaseya Traverse

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs. Kaseya Traverse and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs. Kaseya Traverse report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.