We performed a comparison between Cisco Enterprise Routers and Juniper MX Series Routers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Routers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The product can scale."
"The documentation is very good."
"The performance of the devices is very reliable."
"The solution is mostly stable."
"We achieve good performance in our data center."
"The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the devices. Also, from a feature perspective, Cisco Enterprise Routers are complete."
"I have found the most valuable feature of Cisco Enterprise Routers to be the simplicity of the command-line interface, it is very intuitive as to how the commands need to be configured for a specific use case."
"The most valuable features are stability and the initial setup wizard."
"I would say it is very user-friendly."
"Users are able to easily configure the whole solution via simple data."
"The performance is good."
"It's one of the more stable routers."
"Juniper Switches is stable, easy to use, flexible, and has good performance. Also, the technology is good. It has a lifetime warranty and the prices are also very good."
"The product is easy to use."
"The full Internet DGP is a valuable feature."
"The solution is quite stable. We've found it to be very good. There aren't bugs, glitches, or crashes."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Over time things have changed where Cisco has not invested in improving the orchestration and simplifying it for people who do not want to get into the details. Cisco has not gone into that focus."
"I would like to see the setup time reduced."
"The security could improve for Cisco Enterprise Routers. I understand there's a security appliance that is separate, but in terms of the router, there can be improvements made to prevent unwanted users from accessing the router or trying to manipulate the traffic that is passing through it."
"The price could be better."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required to be made by making it cheaper."
"Cisco routers are an expensive product."
"The solution could improve by having multiple features inclusive of the router, such as a free firewall and VPN. Additionally, it should be a generic box that can act as a router, firewall, and switch."
"The product's pricing is an area that is too fuzzy to deal with, in my opinion, making it an area where improvements are required."
"The solution could improve reliability and it needs more functions."
"Juniper have addressed issues with the MX204, but it still has a limited number of interfaces. Ideally, it should support up to twenty or twenty-four interfaces to better serve smaller service providers. Additionally, the MX304 doesn't support subscriber management, also known as BNG, which I believe should be included."
"While it is challenging to pinpoint specific areas for enhancement, there is room for better support and updates for Ansible."
"Better documentation to assist with implementation would be helpful."
"The documentation needs to be updated to reflect the changes made in the latest update."
"There is room for improvement in pricing. The product could be cheaper for smaller networks."
"The only thing that might need improvement would be the occasional downtime."
"We'd appreciate it if they had a better GUI. It would be more flexible for the customers that way."
Cisco Enterprise Routers is ranked 2nd in Routers with 101 reviews while Juniper MX Series Routers is ranked 3rd in Routers with 33 reviews. Cisco Enterprise Routers is rated 8.6, while Juniper MX Series Routers is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cisco Enterprise Routers writes "Allows us to configure NAS through Cisco activities and to create GRE channels with different sites". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper MX Series Routers writes "Good performance, long life span, and easy to set up". Cisco Enterprise Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Huawei Enterprise Routers, HPE Enterprise Routers, OneAccess Enterprise Routers and MikroTik Cloud Router Switch, whereas Juniper MX Series Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Huawei Enterprise Routers, MikroTik Cloud Router Switch, HPE Enterprise Routers and ExtremeRouting. See our Cisco Enterprise Routers vs. Juniper MX Series Routers report.
See our list of best Routers vendors.
We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
