Chronosphere vs IDERA Precise comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Chronosphere Logo
805 views|732 comparisons
IDERA Logo
313 views|270 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Chronosphere and IDERA Precise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: February 2024).
757,260 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Chronosphere?
Anonymous User
Ranking
Views
805
Comparisons
732
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
313
Comparisons
270
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
February 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: February 2024.
757,260 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Precise Application Performance Platform, Precise APM, Precise for SAP, Precise for Peoplesoft
Learn More
Overview

Chronosphere is the only observability platform that puts you back in control by taming rampant data growth and cloud-native complexity, delivering increased business confidence.

Precise for Databases helps database administrators to find and fix database performance problems in physical, virtual, and cloud environments. Unlike its competition, it provides deep database optimization, isolation of problems and causes, scalable deployment, what-if analysis for changes, and history, trending, and planning.

Precise for Applications helps IT administrators to find and fix application performance problems in physical, virtual, and cloud environments. Unlike its competition, it provides deep database optimization, end-to-end transaction view, isolation of problems and causes, scalable deployment, what-if analysis for changes, and  history, trending, and planning.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Banco Bradesco; Bank of America; Carrefour; Energy Future Holdings; Fedex; Marriott International; Nestle; Reed Elsevier Group; Bank Leumi; Beijing Giftedstuffs Information Company, Ltd.; Daiwa Capital Markets, London; Magnitogorsky Iron Plant; Europa Sports; Mobistar Enterprise Services NV/SA; Air France; Casino IT; SoftBCom, Ltd.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm17%
Manufacturing Company13%
Computer Software Company12%
Retailer8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Healthcare Company13%
Real Estate/Law Firm13%
Financial Services Firm10%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise65%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business32%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise60%
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
February 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: February 2024.
757,260 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Chronosphere is ranked 54th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while IDERA Precise is ranked 60th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Chronosphere is rated 0.0, while IDERA Precise is rated 9.0. On the other hand, Chronosphere is most compared with Honeycomb.io, Datadog, Grafana, Dynatrace and Splunk APM, whereas IDERA Precise is most compared with Dynatrace.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.