Checkmk vs OpenText AI Operations Management comparison

Checkmk and OpenText are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Checkmk is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.5, while OpenText is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.3. Checkmk holds a 5.4% mindshare in CMS, compared to OpenText’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Checkmk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Checkmk

Read 9 Checkmk reviews

4,452 Views
3,072 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText AI Operations Mana...

Read 48 OpenText AI Operations Management reviews

1,290 Views
413 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Checkmk

OpenText AI Operations Mana...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

OpenText AI Operations Management and Checkmk are both versatile platforms in IT operations management. Users indicate Checkmk has the upper hand due to its straightforward pricing and strong feature set relative to its cost, whereas OpenText is valued for its automation capabilities despite its higher price and complex licensing.

Features: OpenText AI Operations Management offers comprehensive business service status presentation, robust event correlation, and a unified view of network and application metrics with high scalability. Checkmk provides resource monitoring, automatic discovery, and valuable alerting capabilities, offering adaptability and seamless integration with other solutions. Its simplicity and automation in monitoring complex infrastructures are highly regarded.

Room for Improvement: OpenText faces challenges with complex setup and needs improvements in simplifying integration and offering agent-less deployment. Enhancements in correlation mechanisms are also suggested. Checkmk users note the need for more intuitive alert management, broader integration capabilities, and a more user-friendly onboarding experience, as well as high availability options being more straightforward.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText supports both on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, providing flexibility, yet its setup can be intricate with varying support quality, requiring improvements in response times. Checkmk offers simpler on-premises deployment processes with reliable support, although geographic availability for nuanced assistance could improve.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText is valued for its automation that reduces manual tasks, though its high price and complicated licensing structure present challenges for smaller enterprises. In contrast, Checkmk is praised for its affordability and simplicity in licensing, making it a favorable choice for cost-effective solutions, especially those with limited budgets. Both solutions provide substantial ROI through automation, with Checkmk benefiting from a price advantage.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmk vs. OpenText AI Operations Management Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. OpenText AI Operations Management

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmk

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

16th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (14th), Server Monitoring (8th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (24th)

OpenText AI Operations Mana...

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

29th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (8th), IT Operations Analytics (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Checkmk is 5.4%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText AI Operations Management is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Checkmk	5.4%
OpenText AI Operations Management	0.5%
Other	94.1%

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Paolo Sala

Application performance and System monitoring at Agos

A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring

The main room for improvement is in the solution's presentation and the integration area. In our company, we use the integration capabilities from ServiceNow. We also have another big monitoring solution in place in our company, which is Dynatrace. At the moment, there doesn't exist an out-of-the-box integration for Dynatrace. I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most. The only implementation of Checkmk that allows high availability is the virtual appliance that has the option for the availability of a different box. Otherwise, you have to find a way to implement it manually with some custom solution, which could be an improvement.

Read full review

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Powerful data integration, comprehensive automation, and hybrid compatibility

The data lake is a very powerful feature within OpenText Operations Bridge. It can integrate with any BI tool to collect AI data and perform a variety of functions. It offers hybrid compatibility and supports desktop application customization and cloud integration. Another essential capability is server automation, which became significantly easier with the software appliance for deployment. This solution also provides role-based access that enhances data privacy and security.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"It's versatile, scalable, and easier to use compared to other solutions like Nagios and OMD."

"I really like the auto-discovery feature."

"Checkmk was built on a platform that was user-friendly, and I could build my charts easily."

"The initial setup of Checkmk was easy...It is a very stable solution."

"The alerting system in Checkmk really works properly."

"The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."

"Overall, from one to ten, I rate Checkmk a nine."

More Checkmk pros

"I've found the solution to be very scalable."

"It has the capability to display overall health of the infrastructure and is very useful for executive reports on the health of the infrastructure."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its grouping scripts and event focus."

"You can create an application topology that shows relationships between different components."

"I rate OpenText Operations Bridge as a solid nine on a scale of one to ten."

"OpsBridge has good event correlation facilities and root-cause identification algorithms."

"It allows us to build dashboards for individual parts of the business. Our team members appreciate that they can just get a view of their part of the world without having to worry about anyone else's."

"The most valuable feature is that everything can be consolidated into one dashboard."

More OpenText AI Operations Management pros

Cons

"The main challenge for us is that we're moving from Nagios to Checkmk, and we're still getting used to the new way of working."

"It is easy for tech-savvy people, but newcomers might find it intimidating."

"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most."

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

"In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."

"Checkmk does not work too easily with the PowerStore. I use a PowerShell script as Checkmk runs on Linux and a Windows system, connecting with the Checkmk agent."

"Sometimes we receive alerts, and it can become annoying when you acknowledge an alert. It is very clunky when you acknowledge the alert. The process is not very intuitive, and there are instances where it feels a bit cumbersome to acknowledge an alert."

"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."

More Checkmk cons

"We need improvements in delivering quality reports from OBM and in integrating Operations Bridge with other components like UCMDB for asset discovery."

"The initial setup is a little bit complex."

"What needs improvement in Micro Focus Operations Bridge is its resource heaviness because you need many resources to deploy and support it. It's a good solution for larger organizations, but for small businesses, not so much."

"The solution is overall "heavy", requiring multiple servers, even without HA."

"The service takes a very long time to start and it requires a lot of resources."

"Installing and upgrading the HPOM and Operations Agent software is not always easy and the process can be quite fragile. Once it is running, it is very quick and stable, but an upgrade can quite easily break something or terminate unexpectedly."

"We are waiting for quicker release cycles. Also containerized upgrade, so that you don't have to bring a system entirely down to make a minor upgrade, in fact, or a minor patch."

"I know that in the next version, X1005, they're moving to more graphical overviews, which should help our senior managers."

More OpenText AI Operations Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Checkmk is cheaper compared to other enterprise products."

"The product is affordable."

"Checkmk is a fairly reasonably priced solution."

"Setup costs can be high depending on the partner, but it is worth it."

"As OpsBridge is a suite of products bundled together, you may find yourself paying for software functionality that you don't actually use, e.g. Real User Monitor (RUM)."

"It is competitive."

"The cost is very high."

"The licensing model for Micro Focus Operations Bridge is unit-based so it can be one device or ten devices depending on your situation or model. Cost-wise, it's much more if you have more devices and features such as infrastructure monitoring, analytic dashboard, and business dashboard in your model."

"Pricing is very flexible and depends on the modules selected as per the requirement."

"The licensing cost for this solution is approximately $1,000 USD."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Checkmk?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmk?

I will get more information about Checkmk when the proof of concept is done. It's going to be before the summer. There will be a report about the tool and a recommendation to use it. So far, it loo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Checkmk?

Checkmk ( /products/checkmk-reviews ) is a monitoring tool, so that's what I will use it for. Right now, it's not in production, but it's in a proof of concept phase. It looks good, so probably, du...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Operations Bridge?

From a cost perspective, OpenText Operations Bridge is cost-effective as it saves us man hours. What used to be done manually by a person is now done automatically. With its automation capabilities...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Operations Bridge?

The only aspect I find lacking in OpenText Operations Bridge is more aesthetic. The dashboards from OpenText Operations Bridge, when compared to those from Splunk, are less visually appealing. Splu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Operations Bridge?

We use OpenText Operations Bridge ( /products/opentext-operations-bridge-reviews ) more from an event correlation perspective. We do not use it for pure monitoring since we have other monitoring to...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Checkmk

Compared 41% of the time

LibreNMS vs Checkmk

Compared 9% of the time

Icinga vs Checkmk

Compared 8% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Checkmk

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios Core vs Checkmk

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmk Competitors

SCOM vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 17% of the time

OpsRamp vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 16% of the time

BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 12% of the time

Devo vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 10% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs OpenText AI Operations Management

Compared 10% of the time

More OpenText AI Operations Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk

October 2025

Download Checkmk product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AI Operations Management

September 2025

OpenText AI Operations Management report

Download OpenText AI Operations Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Operations Bridge, Operations Bridge Manager, Micro Focus Operations Analytics

Overview

Checkmk provides a comprehensive monitoring solution designed to streamline IT infrastructure management with features like auto-discovery, custom checks, and effective alerting.

Checkmk serves as a powerful tool for organizations managing large networks of servers, databases, and network appliances across multiple locations. It simplifies monitoring tasks with features like auto-discovery, custom scripting, and Slack integration. Users benefit from its resource monitoring capabilities and scalability, although there are areas for improvement, such as alert acknowledgment and greater usability. It supports both Linux and Windows environments, enabling effective oversight of IT infrastructure. The growing body of documentation enhances its adaptability in complex settings.

What are the key features of Checkmk?

Auto-Discovery: Identifies new hosts and applies monitoring rules automatically.
Custom Monitoring Checks: Tailor checks for databases and specific applications.
Slack Integration: Receive downtime alerts directly in Slack channels.
Automation for Scripts: Streamline repetitive tasks with scripts.
Effective Alerting System: Offers timely notifications on network activities.

What benefits can users expect?

Resource Efficiency: Saves time on configuration with automated features.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network and system requirements.
Cost-Effectiveness: Suitable option for budget-conscious users.
User-Friendly Setup: Easy to configure, reducing the learning curve.

Industries deploying Checkmk frequently utilize it for monitoring IT infrastructure, including servers and network appliances, to manage proactive issue identification and compliance. Companies employ it in the proof of concept phase or for ongoing monitoring, covering hosts, services, and custom application metrics.

Checkmk

OpenText AI Operations Management centralizes event correlation and monitoring across infrastructures, prioritizing scalability and automation for efficient alert management. It empowers organizations with transparency and insights essential for effective IT resource management in hybrid cloud environments.

OpenText AI Operations Management offers comprehensive solutions for event correlation, integration, and centralized alert management. With capabilities that streamline operations, this tool supports efficient IT management across AWS, GCP, and on-premises environments. Despite requiring improvements in performance and usability, its robust reporting and seamless monitoring provide valuable insights for root cause analysis. Users leverage this platform to integrate event data, automate incidents, and manage hybrid infrastructures effectively, making it a key component in enhancing service perspectives globally. Its heavy architecture and reliance on Java and Flash, coupled with complex licensing and pricing, necessitate attention to functionality and support areas.

What are the key features of OpenText AI Operations Management?

Event Correlation: Integrates and correlates event data for improved incident response.
Centralized Alerts: Raises alerts efficiently to streamline IT operations.
Comprehensive Dashboard: Consolidates information for better visibility.
Hybrid Cloud Support: Manages AWS, GCP, and on-premises environments.
Automation: Enhances operations with server automation and performance management.

What benefits do users find with OpenText AI Operations Management?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlines IT processes for quicker issue resolution.
Transparency: Offers robust reporting and data centralization for clarity.
Resource Management: Improves management of IT resources and service perspectives.
Scalability: Accommodates growth with flexible architecture.
Noise Reduction: Decreases event noise to enhance response efficiency.

OpenText AI Operations Management is widely implemented in industries requiring comprehensive monitoring capabilities. Organizations benefit from its ability to consolidate tools and manage events effectively across hybrid environments. The integration of incident automation and performance evaluation tools is particularly beneficial for those looking to enhance compliance support and reduce response times. Despite some challenges, the platform remains a valuable asset in managing complex IT environments and improving operational effectiveness.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

GE Money Bank, Bank AlJazira, Tech Mahindra

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. OpenText AI Operations Management

September 2025

Free Report: Checkmk vs. OpenText AI Operations Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmk vs. OpenText AI Operations Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmk vs. OpenText AI Operations Management report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.