Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Tenable are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.7, while Tenable is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.5. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 0.9% mindshare in AS, compared to Tenable’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Read 76 Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) reviews

10,727 Views
3,004 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Read 18 Tenable.io Web Application Scanning reviews

3,327 Views
2,761 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2026

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and Check Point WAF compete in the web security tools category. While Tenable.io impresses with ease of use and pricing, Check Point WAF's advanced features make it the stronger solution for extensive security needs.

Features: Tenable.io offers automated scanning, risk-based prioritization, and a user-friendly interface. Check Point WAF provides deep threat prevention, bot mitigation, and high configurability.

Room for Improvement: Tenable.io could enhance its feature set for more advanced security needs. Check Point WAF could simplify its deployment process, improve its learning curve, and offer better integration with third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable.io boasts straightforward deployment and responsive support, appealing to those seeking simplicity. Check Point WAF offers comprehensive support and documentation, although its deployment can be more complex.

Pricing and ROI: Tenable.io is cost-effective, offering strong ROI and lower setup costs for budget-conscious organizations. Check Point WAF, with higher initial investment, provides substantial ROI through its robust features, catering to those focused on advanced security.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (8th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (5th), DevSecOps (2nd)

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

26th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is 1.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)	0.9%
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning	1.3%
Other	97.8%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Krishnakumar Mahadevan

CISO at Spink Solutions Private Limited

Cloud security has strengthened risk posture and improved advanced threat visibility

There are some API gateway and API securities I mentioned. If these are incorporated with AI-related features, particularly those seven key vulnerabilities I mentioned—token theft and tool poisoning—that would be beneficial. AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate. That is the advantage of FortiGate now. FortiGate is stopping all AI-related vulnerabilities now. FortiGate has this capability. It is unfortunate that even Palo Alto also lacks one or two of these features. Check Point Quantum is very good, without a doubt. However, their capabilities are not in comparison with Palo Alto. There are some features, but there are some gaps in comparison with Palo Alto.

Read full review

Hatem Langar

Security Analyst at TOPNET

Web audits have identified vulnerabilities and now provide clear visibility into compliance gaps

We have experience with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, and we use it as well; we have approximately ten licenses for web application scanning. We use it to find vulnerabilities, but Tenable.io Web Application Scanning does not include remediation; we remediate with other products. We use the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is AI, which makes operations easier. Moreover, it is easy to deploy."

"Among its most outstanding features is the powerful AI in container security; above all, it is one of the most powerful and easy-to-manage solutions."

"One of the best features of CloudGuard WAF is its user-friendly GUI dashboard."

"It seamlessly protects through machine learning, giving us visibility into potential attacks and where they come from."

"Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is a SaaS platform that gives unified cloud-native security across my applications, workloads, and network, allowing me to automate security, prevent threats, ensure compliance, and manage my security posture well across all my cloud environments."

"I rate it ten out of ten."

"The integration with other Microsoft products, especially Visual Studio, is seamless."

"It provides advanced analytics that gives each team time to prepare for any threat that might occur in the future."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pros

"I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning to others."

"We can get detailed information about vulnerabilities."

"It has good unified web application scanning and exposure management."

"The most valuable features of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning are the integration into specific use cases and scanning. All of the features of the solution are useful."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning provides a detailed report, identifying functions that are complex and need to be more maintainable and readable."

"If customers need a cost-efficient way to do very good ramification scanning and vulnerability management, this is the right solution."

"Our customers adopt this solution because of the replication testing and the vulnerability assessment it can do. It is a multi-faceted product."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning pros

Cons

"I would like this solution to be extended to cellular devices or tablets."

"The learning curve was a challenge due to initially incorrect configurations. It took approximately a month and a half to understand how the solution works because of inadequate documentation."

"For Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF), the negative aspects include the very high price, complex licensing, and the need for specialized trained people to configure it, which is comparatively more complicated than other firewalls like Palo Alto and FortiGate."

"The user interface, SmartConsole, sometimes malfunctions and requires a restart."

"For now, the product is doing all that I need, however, I need the support of IPv6."

"Some challenges with Check Point CloudGuard Code Security include that we noticed FortiGate is much more efficient on AWS, and our team prefers to deploy FortiGate there instead of CloudGuard due to the management challenges on the cloud."

"When I was working with the WAF platform, there were limitations, particularly concerning compliance and reporting."

"At present, we require a lot of customization and additional features to make it usable in our system."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) cons

"Sometimes it lags with different cloud environments."

"The market is standard for vulnerability scanning, however, the posture can be improved through Tenable's prioritization engine."

"The dashboard could be more user-friendly."

"It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly."

"The reporting has a very limited customization capability."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning conducts a general scan, which wastes time. The scan needs to be specific."

"I would like for them to add proxy filtering, where you can transfer and alter the package. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing package, which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail."

"It isn't easy to manage vulnerabilities in Tenable."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The base solution costs approximately 30,000 euros, with an additional 2,000 euros per year for licenses and support."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is comparable to other products in the market."

"I work for an Indian banking client. In India, companies are on a budget. The company liked Check Point very much, but it was a little bit costly compared to FortiWeb. However, it had more features compared to FortiWeb."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF is expensive compared to Azure WAF."

"The pricing is competitive compared to other solutions on the market. So, the licensing cost is average."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly and competitive."

"As Infiniti customers, the pricing is manageable, as we have allowances dedicated to each Check Point product. The price is not as high compared to other options I have dealt with in the past."

"I find the pricing to be reasonable."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pricing and cost advice

"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."

"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."

"The pricing is okay."

"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."

"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	54
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	34

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

It is a little bit expensive, but the pricing model is acceptable, though a reduction would make it more competitive with leaders such as Palo Alto.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

The false positive rate is a concern, but I could recommend improvements where false positives have to be minimized better. This all depends on how the rules are customized and configured, and it c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The main purpose is to have network security through machine learning, which can offer threat detection and intelligence for my endpoints, and I am looking for application security. I am looking fo...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

If there were a solution, I would like to see automation and an integrated remediation solution for vulnerability or patch management.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

I do not understand what API approach means; I do not understand this term. I think Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is the best option on the market at the moment. My review rating for this pro...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

I think the price is expensive. We do not have an idea of how much we have to pay approximately, but comparing to other products, Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 7% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 7% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Competitors

Acunetix vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 7% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 7% of the time

Reflectiz vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 7% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 4% of the time

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

August 2026

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Download Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

July 2026

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report

Download Tenable.io Web Application Scanning product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec, Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

No data available

Overview

Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.

Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.

What are the main features of Check Point WAF?

AI and Machine Learning: Preemptively blocks threats without signature reliance.
Centralized Management: Simplifies oversight and reduces costs.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security posture against zero-day attacks.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup with user-friendly interface.
Comprehensive Protection: Guards against SQL injection and DDoS attacks.

What benefits should be considered by users?

Reduced False Positives: Minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces management overhead.
Insightful Reporting: Enables swift response to threats.
Seamless Integration: Enhances security processes with existing tools.

Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.

Check Point Software Technologies

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning delivers automated scanning and robust risk mitigation for diverse cloud environments, prioritizing security and compliance for modern organizations.

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning leverages scalable architecture for comprehensive vulnerability detection across applications and systems. It integrates with cloud services, providing an interface to analyze complex functions and enhance security. Detailed reports guide vulnerability management and ensure compliance with key standards.

What are the critical features of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

Priority Ratings: Streamlines risk assessment by ranking vulnerabilities based on severity.
Automated Scanning: Simplifies continuous security checks across environments.
Scalable Architecture: Ensures adaptability across expansive networks.
Cloud Integration: Supports various cloud platforms for consistent security.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed insights into vulnerabilities and risk mitigation measures.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security Posture: Strengthens defenses with thorough vulnerability analysis.
Compliance Assurance: Facilitates adherence to OWASP Top 10 and NISC standards.
Streamlined Management: Simplifies processes with a cloud-based approach.
Insightful Dashboards: Provides easy access to important security metrics.

Organizations across industries employ Tenable.io Web Application Scanning for routine vulnerability assessments, safeguarding container exposure, internal networks, and more. Dashboards and reports aid in informed decision-making, supporting comprehensive threat detection and compliance.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

IMDEX

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

August 2026

Free Report: Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.