

Check Point WAF and Proofpoint Enterprise DLP both operate in the cybersecurity market, specializing in web application security and data loss prevention, respectively. Check Point WAF appears to have an edge in integrating cloud solutions with highly responsive customer service, while Proofpoint Enterprise DLP excels in behavior analysis for insider threat detection using AI, catering to complex email security needs.
Features: Check Point WAF is known for its rapid deployment, integration with Azure ExpressRoute, and an AI engine that ensures efficient threat detection while supporting a wide range of applications without additional hardware needs. It provides proactive support, contributing to its cost-effectiveness and scalability. Proofpoint Enterprise DLP focuses on preventing data leaks using behavior analysis and strong integration with email security, offering comprehensive dashboard visibility and effective alerts for abnormal user activity, thus enhancing protection against insider threats.
Room for Improvement: Check Point WAF could benefit from a more intuitive user interface and clearer documentation. The initial setup is complex, requiring improved policy management support and pricing adaptations for smaller businesses. Proofpoint Enterprise DLP can improve the intuitive nature of its dashboard and AI capabilities to reduce false positives and enhance user experience. Better policy management and integration with endpoint monitoring are necessary upgrades.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point WAF is praised for seamless integration in cloud and hybrid environments, supported by highly rated customer service for its responsiveness and agile customer interaction. Although Proofpoint Enterprise DLP integrates well across cloud platforms, feedback on support is mixed due to occasional ticket handling delays and broader integration challenges. Both systems have knowledgeable support teams, yet Check Point's assistance is considered more effective.
Pricing and ROI: Check Point WAF is seen as more costly. However, its high-security ROI is deemed justified through reduced false positives and efficient operations, with a subscription-based model for predictable cost management. Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, while expensive, offers significant value with its exceptional protection features. Both solutions deliver ROI through enhanced security and resource optimization, yet Check Point’s model promises more transparency in cost management.
When we are attacked, we can understand how important the solution is.
When you migrate to the cloud, it feels like saving 90% of your time.
Most of the operations happen in the background, so I do not spend much time on it.
The package that Proofpoint provides is better in the long run, especially since results have been seen in prevention and responses to exercises concerning external files being sent out during various departures.
ROI from Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is evident in terms of incident reduction, operational efficiency, and breach cost avoidance.
This allowed us to coach and train our users in managing their risky behaviors, as well as the alerting capabilities, which were superior and helped free up my team's time to focus on other important tasks.
They need to increase the number of people for 24/7 support.
They were responsive even before we committed to buying their solution.
I also received full technical support, especially during the implementation.
They are technical and provide options that help narrow down solutions.
This service or features plays a big role in protecting the information and protecting the sensitive details which are entered in the email body or somewhere in the emails as a subject, as a signature, or in any form.
Proofpoint Enterprise DLP consultants are also provided who help in the security domain and analyze the monthly details about attacks and what needs to be done.
If I need to scale, I open a Whatsapp group with the director and the team, and we quickly proceed to do so.
They have sufficient resources, and there are no challenges from a scalability perspective.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF's scalability is very good.
Proofpoint Enterprise DLP scales very well for enterprise environments due to its cloud-native architecture, which supports growth in users, policy complexity, integration volume, and data throughput without performance degradation.
Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is scalable and can be used in a large environment, especially for emails and cloud workloads.
Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is very scalable to any size organization, from small, medium to large.
It is very stable.
It is very stable, never crashing or giving me an error that I can see.
I did not have any issues in the last three years during which I had more than ten critical services running on CloudGuard.
It also automatically blocks that sender if the sender is malicious. I really value that feature.
Given the single console for managing the entire Proofpoint portfolio solution, as well as managing policies and the privacy controls, it has been a very stable and productive tool.
Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is overall stable with minimal disruption and downtime.
The provider could improve by providing better guidance and support during the configuration process.
Future releases should include better bot mitigation, behavioral anomaly detection, compliance templates, advanced threat intel integration, and streamlined multi-cloud support to boost protection and usability.
A machine learning-based adaptive mode could help the WAF learn over time and auto-tune policies.
An improvement opportunity would be advanced policy simulation tools for conflict detection between rules and clear rule precedence visualization, which would help understand the source of issues.
It is quite effective in detecting and preventing data loss through the analysis of user behavior and content.
Occasional mishaps arise related to users' devices affected by Proofpoint or when Proofpoint isn't logging specific device actions.
It is more expensive than f5, where we purchased everything as bundles, and Check Point costs more, but it is worth the money.
It is less costly than Cloudflare, Fortinet, and other vendors.
I know that its price is relatively expensive compared to other products but it gives benefits that are worth it.
Proofpoint Enterprise DLP pricing starts on a per user basis, from $2 to up to $8 or $10 per user depending on the features you need.
It is a little bit higher and not very cheap compared to other DLP tools, but it also has a lot of value if you use it properly.
I find with Proofpoint you get what you pay for, so it's a great service.
Upon implementation and evaluation with third-party penetration testing, it meets rigorous security standards required for dealing with financial institutions.
It can protect against zero-day attacks and hidden anomalies.
The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively.
Adaptive information protection with Proofpoint Enterprise DLP has changed how we handle sensitive data and respond to threats, allowing us to block sensitive data if it is being shared with external persons.
The adaptive email feature helps me in tracking and automatically identifying if a user is sending sensitive information to the wrong recipient and provides real-time warning banners to nudge users when they are about to make a mistake or reduce accidental data loss.
Detailed reporting and automated encryption have helped me because, since our DLP is on monitoring mode, the reporting helps us check how many users are currently sending emails with sensitive information.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Proofpoint Enterprise DLP | 1.3% |
| Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) | 0.7% |
| Other | 98.0% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 54 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 34 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 25 |
Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.
Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.
What are the main features of Check Point WAF?Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.
Proofpoint Enterprise DLP safeguards data with advanced protection capabilities tailored for comprehensive data loss prevention. It is designed to effectively manage and secure sensitive information across various environments.
Proofpoint Enterprise DLP delivers robust security to enterprises seeking to protect critical data. It supports diverse use cases, ensuring seamless adaptation to an organization's unique data protection needs. With valuable features focused on compliance and user activity monitoring, it decreases the risk of unauthorized data access. The system also offers opportunities for improvement in integration ease and reporting functions, which could enhance its adaptability and analytics capabilities.
What are its most important features?In industries such as healthcare and finance, where data security and compliance are critical, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP's targeted solutions provide essential tools for industry-specific challenges. Tailoring capabilities to fit sector-specific needs ensures that organizations can effectively protect sensitive data.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.