

Check Point Remote Access VPN and Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) compete in the secure remote access and network security solutions category. Harmony SASE seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive security suite and advanced management features.
Features: Check Point Remote Access VPN offers seamless integration with existing Check Point infrastructure, secure VPN connections, and flexible authentication, including multi-factor authentication. It supports quick deployment without additional hardware for firewall users. Check Point Harmony SASE provides a comprehensive security suite with ZTNA and SASE capabilities, centralized management, threat intelligence integration, and real-time traffic optimization.
Room for Improvement: Check Point Remote Access VPN is criticized for complex update procedures and the lack of a Linux client. Users suggest automating updates and enhancing the user interface. Check Point Harmony SASE requires improved integration with third-party identity providers and a more intuitive management portal. Enhancements in mobile client features and granular reporting capabilities are needed.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point Remote Access VPN is favored for on-premises deployment, integrating well with existing infrastructure and highly reliable. Customer support is good but sometimes slow. Check Point Harmony SASE offers flexibility with a cloud-first approach, appealing to organizations seeking cloud integration. It is generally well-regarded for customer service, though there can be challenges with complex deployment issues.
Pricing and ROI: Check Point Remote Access VPN is cost-effective for companies using existing Check Point infrastructure with competitive pricing, though additional costs are required for full integration. Check Point Harmony SASE involves a higher initial investment due to its extensive features. Despite higher costs, it provides positive ROI through enhanced productivity and reduced incidents. Both solutions offer competitive pricing models, with cost considerations for smaller organizations.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) blocked access to those URLs at the network level before users could click through.
We are saving 40% of our time, which is good.
It reduces the dependency on being physically present in the office and enhances the overall user experience, saving time and maintaining security.
I have seen a return on investment with fewer employees needed and time saved.
It has reduced the number of support tickets related to remote access by about 30%, saving our IT team significant time.
I would rate support 10 out of 10.
People working really hard, listening to every issue and request, and replying within hours.
They are really helpful, and whenever we face any technical or configuration issues, we reach out to them, and they help us resolve the issues as soon as possible.
Contacting the Technical Assistance Centers (TACs) initially can be difficult, but once I get in touch with the TAC team, it is easy to solve problems.
The customer support for Check Point Remote Access VPN has been very helpful and responsive whenever we needed assistance.
The cloud-native model ensures we are not tied to any specific location or hardware, which has been a great game changer in terms of agility.
I would rate it nine out of ten for scalability.
Check Point Harmony SASE's scalability is good; it can handle growth easily, allowing me to easily add another region and gateway to have more people join in.
I don't see that we can hit any kind of roof in our organization.
The scalability of Check Point Remote Access VPN is good as it supports a large number of remote users simultaneously.
Our organization finds Check Point Remote Access VPN handles increased numbers of remote users smoothly without performance issues.
There are some lags and glitches with connectivity, so I would rate the stability as between seven or eight out of ten.
After the last improvement, I can say it is much more stable now.
Check Point Harmony SASE is stable most of the time, but there are still some issues that are hard to troubleshoot.
Otherwise, the experience and stability are outstanding.
I have not faced any issue, downtime, or latency with Check Point Remote Access VPN.
Check Point Remote Access VPN is very stable.
A local data center in Turkey would enhance the product, as currently, our Internet traffic goes to another country, which is problematic for us.
One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers.
The product is lacking features that other competitors have, making it quite challenging to migrate customers to this solution because it feels very much unfinished.
The response time is much worse, with the first layer of support lacking sufficient knowledge on how to troubleshoot issues.
Optimizing handshake speed and reducing reconnection delays would improve the user experience, particularly for mobile and hybrid workers.
Deploying these solutions requires higher technical expertise than other solutions.
Cost efficiency is a consideration, as SASE products are not the cheapest security products.
The cost is a bit expensive for most users.
It is a bit expensive.
It is competitively priced, and we have chosen it for its market leadership in the firewall space.
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing are straightforward, though the setup is a bit expensive.
Everything is included in the firewall licensing, so it's free to use as long as you have a firewall.
The firewall management is the most valuable feature for me.
The Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) feature is a major highlight as it gives users seamless and secure access to internal resources without requiring a full-blown VPN, which improves both security and user experience.
The Zero Trust and segmentation have helped my team and our customers significantly because we are able to protect every scope and allow the work-from-home users to access internal resources while passing through a threat prevention gateway, ensuring that everything is safe.
The functionality enables secure access for remotely connecting users, which is necessary for our operations.
Check Point Remote Access VPN has positively impacted my organization by improving productivity and given us a workaround in times of downtime.
Check Point Remote Access VPN has impacted my organization positively by providing better security and ensuring our data is safe within the entity.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Check Point Remote Access VPN | 3.1% |
| Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) | 4.3% |
| Other | 92.6% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 53 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 20 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 53 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 31 |
| Large Enterprise | 34 |
Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly Perimeter 81, offers robust security features like split tunneling, MFA, and Zero Trust Network Access focused on secure remote access and optimized connectivity for remote teams.
Check Point Harmony SASE delivers advanced security through a user-friendly interface, efficient VPN connections, and a centralized management console. It enhances security with real-time threat intelligence from ThreatCloud and traffic management via built-in optimization. Firewall as a Service and Secure Web Gateway safeguard against unauthorized access and phishing. While users seek enhanced networking customizations and better integration with identity providers, there's an emphasis on improving reporting, real-time analytics, and policy management. Requests also include a Chrome extension, traffic balancing, and simplified configuration to address some resource-intensive aspects.
What are the key features of Check Point Harmony SASE?
How can organizations benefit from using Check Point Harmony SASE?
Check Point Harmony SASE is used across industries for secure remote access and connectivity, protecting sensitive data, and managing access to corporate resources. It is ideal for those with hybrid cloud models and requires comprehensive security measures combined with existing IT infrastructures to meet specific industry demands.
Check Point Remote Access VPN enables secure connectivity from remote locations with features like strong encryption and multifactor authentication. Its compatibility with multiple devices ensures operational flexibility for employees and partners accessing corporate resources.
Check Point Remote Access VPN integrates with current firewalls, providing robust security and seamless management. It supports effective remote work with centralized control, allowing users to connect securely from anywhere. While valued for its ease of use and stable performance, it faces limitations in Linux support and requires improved documentation. High-load performance inconsistencies and installation complexities are areas for development. Its adaptability to diverse systems, including cloud integration, offers scalable connectivity solutions.
What are the key features?Organizations in industries like technology and finance implement Check Point Remote Access VPN to maintain secure remote connectivity for employees and partners. By enabling access to internal resources and applications, they support effective remote work and adhere to stringent data security standards, particularly during increased remote working demands or business travel scenarios.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.