Check Point Pointsec [EOL] vs Digital Guardian comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Check Point Software Technologies and Fortra are both solutions in the Endpoint Encryption category. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Fortra users who would recommend it.

Check Point Pointsec [EOL]

Read 4 Check Point Pointsec [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Digital Guardian

Read 13 Digital Guardian reviews

8,011 Views
641 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Check Point Pointsec [EOL]

Digital Guardian

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Check Point Pointsec [EOL] and Digital Guardian based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Broadcom, Sophos and others in Endpoint Encryption.

To learn more, read our detailed Endpoint Encryption Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Encryption

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Pointsec [EOL]

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Digital Guardian

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (17th), Endpoint Encryption (6th), Mobile Data Protection (3rd), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (26th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (54th)

Featured Reviews

AshleyMorales

Cloud computing at ITQS

Very good disk encryption, secure authentication, and centralized administration

At the time when this tool was launched on the market, it had new technologies integrated within. It was the beginning of the revolution of computing, and at the beginning, with the characteristics, everything was wonderful. However, if we compare it with today's technologies, we see that it is lacking quite a few things, including a nice interface, more functionalities, integrations with third parties, more security administration in policies, and more detailed reports.

Read full review

Syed Mubeen

Cyber Security Researcher at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Enterprise data protection has supported regulatory compliance and integrates with classification tools

In terms of functionality, many features are valuable in Digital Guardian, as the first thing for most customers is that they are using solutions such as Boldon James and Titus, which fall under the classification side, and Digital Guardian can easily integrate with this data classification solution and has a very granular level of configuration and policy tuning. Digital Guardian's data protection policies are indeed useful for my clients. Regarding Digital Guardian, I find it to be a very good solution, and in fact, it is an enterprise-level solution that has very tight integration with most of the products, with Fortra but also with others.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"At the time when this tool was launched on the market, it had new technologies integrated within."

"If you have a Premium Support plan then the technical support is very good."

"From the moment we started using Check Point Secure Web Gateway, we realized its great value and ability to take it not only on-premise but also into our cloud-based environment."

"One of the characteristics that give us the most value is that it offers the ability to perform HTTPS inspections."

"Full disk encryption helps us ensure that data stored on a device is encrypted."

"Check Point GAiA is easy to use."

"So if you look at enterprise data loss prevention this solution is the best."

"We have been able to monitor access to files from each of our workstations."

"The technical support is really terrific."

"I like the solution's adaptive inspection and container inspection."

"Digital Guardian has cloud correlation servers which give you visibility, work like EDR, and the correlation servers are like a perfect instrument for security analysts."

"Data security is now one of the most important aspects for any organization."

"It has the added advantage of offering forensic analysis."

"The most valuable feature of Digital Guardian is its reputation. They have scored high on the Gartner Magic Quadrant."

More Digital Guardian pros

Cons

"The installation was quite complex."

"Overall, this is a good product but it does lack features that we need."

"The UI was one of the most difficult points to get used to. Due to the UI, even though it was used every day, the administration was complicated."

"In the next release of this solution, I would like to see application identity support."

"We would maybe want (in the future) advanced security in the filtering of access to the metaverse by augmented reality cameras."

"Technical support could be better."

"I would like to see the workflow, to get all the rules and policies set up, be less complicated."

"If the client uses Windows 10 or 11 and Microsoft updates the operating system's version, Digital Guardian must update their product to match compatibility."

"Digital Guardian is, compared to other tools, more complex to implement."

"The solution has complexities around policy creation and deployment."

"My biggest lesson learned from dealing with this product is that they commit to something but they don't deliver it."

"It would be helpful if there was an on-premise version of the solution for companies that cannot use the cloud, such as government sectors."

"Some features on Mac and Linux are not complete currently."

More Digital Guardian cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The cost was around $300,000."

"Digital Guardian has both, subscription and perpetual licenses, but I think when everything (all technologies) will go to the cloud they will only offer subscriptions."

"If I compare Digital Guardian with Symantec, the license cost is lower, but McAfee can be cheaper than Digital Guardian. It depends on how many licenses you plan to buy and how big the project is. The cost is not so high as Symantec, but not as cheap as McAfee. They can easily sell the solution for price."

"The price of Digital Guardian is expensive."

"The price of Digital Guardian is on the higher end compared to other vendors."

"I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten because Digital Guardian is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Encryption solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Digital Guardian?

In my experience, the area closest for improvement is the occurrence of strong false positives. Digital Guardian can generate false positives initially, which can be significantly reduced through p...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Digital Guardian?

My main use case for Digital Guardian is to prevent or stop sensitive data from being copied to USB, email, or cloud, with an example being the blocking of confidential files from being sent via em...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Digital Guardian?

Digital Guardian has significantly improved incident response time by providing real-time detection, instant alerts, and automatic policy enforcement to stop data leakage immediately, which is my s...

See all answers

Comparisons

Symantec Endpoint Encryption vs Check Point Pointsec [EOL]

Compared 22% of the time

Sophos SafeGuard vs Check Point Pointsec [EOL]

Compared 22% of the time

Microsoft BitLocker vs Check Point Pointsec [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

Lookout vs Check Point Pointsec [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs Check Point Pointsec [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

More Check Point Pointsec [EOL] Competitors

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs Digital Guardian

Compared 7% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 5% of the time

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 4% of the time

Dtex Systems vs Digital Guardian

Compared 4% of the time

More Digital Guardian Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Encryption

October 2026

Download Check Point Pointsec [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian

October 2026

Download Digital Guardian product report

Also Known As

Pointsec

No data available

Overview

Information not available

Check Point Software Technologies

Digital Guardian is renowned for its advanced capabilities in data loss prevention and protection of confidential information. Key features enhance data security through proactive monitoring and adaptive policies, catering to businesses across multiple environments.

Digital Guardian provides comprehensive data security by offering features like data classification, endpoint DLP monitoring, and user activity tracking. It integrates seamlessly with tools such as Boldon James and Titus, allowing detailed policy configuration. With security-enhancing cloud correlation servers, it reduces insider threats and enables monitoring across diverse vectors. However, challenges include the need for improved integration between endpoint and network features, enhanced Mac and Linux functionality, and more efficient policy management. Stability and performance issues are also noted, with users seeking improved web email monitoring and better compatibility across different operating systems. Despite these, it remains a solid choice for data protection, particularly in sectors like finance, insurance, and manufacturing.

What are the key features of Digital Guardian?

Data Loss Prevention: Guards against unauthorized data transfers and leaks.
Forensic Analysis: Offers deep insights for improved threat response.
Adaptive Inspection: Tailors security measures to dynamic threats.
Data Classification: Segments data for targeted policy application.
User Activity Tracking: Monitors user interactions for anomalies.

What benefits should users expect?

Enhanced Security Visibility: Better monitoring across multiple vectors reduces risks.
Improved Threat Response: Advanced analytics ensure timely responses to threats.
Regulatory Compliance: Helps meet sector-specific requirements like those in finance.
Scalable Deployment: Supports cloud and on-premise environments for flexibility.

In industries such as finance, insurance, and manufacturing, Digital Guardian is crucial for preventing data breaches and protecting intellectual property. Its focus on compliance and ability to monitor data transfers across endpoints, networks, and emails provide essential safeguards against insider threats and unauthorized information dissemination.

Fortra

Sample Customers

Glatfelter

The Fifth Avenue Theatre, Jabil Circuit

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Broadcom, Sophos and others in Endpoint Encryption. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors and best Mobile Data Protection vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.