Check Point Pointsec [EOL] vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Check Point Software Technologies and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Encryption category. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Check Point Pointsec [EOL]

Read 4 Check Point Pointsec [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Read 39 Symantec Endpoint Encryption reviews

2,781 Views
2,559 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Check Point Pointsec [EOL]

Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Check Point Pointsec [EOL] and Symantec Endpoint Encryption based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Broadcom, ESET and others in Endpoint Encryption.

To learn more, read our detailed Endpoint Encryption Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Encryption

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Pointsec [EOL]

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Encryption (2nd)

Featured Reviews

AshleyMorales

Cloud computing at ITQS

Very good disk encryption, secure authentication, and centralized administration

At the time when this tool was launched on the market, it had new technologies integrated within. It was the beginning of the revolution of computing, and at the beginning, with the characteristics, everything was wonderful. However, if we compare it with today's technologies, we see that it is lacking quite a few things, including a nice interface, more functionalities, integrations with third parties, more security administration in policies, and more detailed reports.

Read full review

Jagadeesh B

Solutions Architect at IBM

Security monitoring has improved and protects mission-level mac segments for critical users

Currently, I am not using this because it is mandated on Office 365, which we are not currently maintaining. We are just using the manage feature, so it is not something we control. We are using Cisco SecureClient for VPN. Symantec Endpoint Encryption is only used at the MAC level segment for the B Mission levels for security purposes, and it is only from the ten user perspective. It is straightforward and not complex. I would rate the complexity as a seven, but I would rate the product itself as a nine. We have approximately fifty thousand in budget. Better security methods are valuable features that we can suggest, as everything is under liability. My overall review rating for this solution is nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"At the time when this tool was launched on the market, it had new technologies integrated within."

"One of the characteristics that give us the most value is that it offers the ability to perform HTTPS inspections."

"If you have a Premium Support plan then the technical support is very good."

"Full disk encryption helps us ensure that data stored on a device is encrypted."

"From the moment we started using Check Point Secure Web Gateway, we realized its great value and ability to take it not only on-premise but also into our cloud-based environment."

"Check Point GAiA is easy to use."

"This automated solution puts us at the base level where we can get better."

"We use it for protecting accounts, which is its most valuable feature."

"You get updates and other encrypted files easily."

"It has reduced the number of incidents related to the loss of information."

"It is fairly stable."

"It is stable."

"The solution was used to find harmful files and viruses on laptops."

"The stability seems to be okay, it works as it was designed to, there are no bugs or glitches, it doesn't crash or freeze, and it's reliable."

More Symantec Endpoint Encryption pros

Cons

"In the next release of this solution, I would like to see application identity support."

"The installation was quite complex."

"The UI was one of the most difficult points to get used to. Due to the UI, even though it was used every day, the administration was complicated."

"We would maybe want (in the future) advanced security in the filtering of access to the metaverse by augmented reality cameras."

"Overall, this is a good product but it does lack features that we need."

"Another improvement that comes to mind is that it could be made much simpler. The user must be able to use it easily and without any hassle."

"There are some issues with the single sign-on with the active directory."

"Currently, the on-premises version is tricky and difficult."

"There are some issues with the single sign-on with the active directory. We had a few problems related to the synchronization between the active directory and the login features of the Symantec products because the users made many password changes during the day. The time for synchronization with the solutions can be improved. I would like to see mobile encryption. There should be a possibility to include all the mobiles of a company in the console. Many customers are asking about encryptions for tablets or cell phones, but we don't have any product that we are comfortable with to recommend to our customers."

"If for example, a user forgets the endpoint key, they cannot access their data. We need a support team that is a single point of contact for the IT entity to be trained and to have documentation for troubleshooting and managing the solution."

"From an administration point of view, maybe it would be ideal to have it centrally managed."

"Symantec Endpoint Encryption can improve by being more secure."

"I think that they should improve the on-premises version to include the manageability and simplicity that is available on the cloud."

More Symantec Endpoint Encryption cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Although the performance and stability of this solution are good, our challenge is the price tag. You buy the solution once, but you also have to keep on buying the licenses yearly."

"Depending on how many modules you will use (up to five) the licensing will be more expensive."

"Symantec Endpoint Encryption is not expensive."

"The solution is good, but it is more expensive than other solutions in the market. Other solutions, such as BitLocker are less expensive."

"The cost of this solution is a little on the higher side."

"There is a license required for this solution."

"We hold an annual license, and their pricing is competitive, falling into the affordable range."

"The licensing costs yearly are $5000."

More Symantec Endpoint Encryption pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Encryption solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Outsourcing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	17

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Microsoft BitLocker compare with Symantec Endpoint Encryption?

Microsoft BitLocker is very intuitive and easy to maintain. It is basically the global standard solution for drive encryption and it successfully fulfills regulatory needs in terms of data protecti...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Endpoint Encryption?

I am not sure about the pricing and licensing cost of Symantec Endpoint Encryption.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Endpoint Encryption?

I am not owning that part and cannot comment on it. Our security team handles that aspect. I have not used it enough to provide detailed feedback.

See all answers

Comparisons

Sophos SafeGuard vs Check Point Pointsec [EOL]

Compared 25% of the time

Microsoft BitLocker vs Check Point Pointsec [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

Lookout vs Check Point Pointsec [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

WinMagic SecureDoc vs Check Point Pointsec [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

More Check Point Pointsec [EOL] Competitors

Microsoft BitLocker vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 19% of the time

Sophos SafeGuard vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 13% of the time

McAfee Complete Data Protection vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 9% of the time

WinMagic SecureDoc vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 9% of the time

ESET Endpoint Encryption vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 8% of the time

More Symantec Endpoint Encryption Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Encryption

August 2026

Download Check Point Pointsec [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Endpoint Encryption

August 2026

Download Symantec Endpoint Encryption product report

Also Known As

Pointsec

Symantec Drive Encryption

Overview

Information not available

Check Point Software Technologies

Symantec Endpoint Encryption provides centralized management and robust encryption, making it a valued security tool for protecting critical data across multiple devices and platforms in industries like finance and government.

Symantec Endpoint Encryption offers seamless integration and scalable security capabilities. Users value its centralized management, strong dashboard, and email protection. Known for ease of use, it supports disk and file encryption, policy assignment, and synchronization of enterprise databases with minimal technical support. Users note challenges in remote deployment and complex manual installations, seeking more intuitive interfaces and better technical support. Performance impact, pricing, and integration with Symantec offerings are areas of concern.

What are the top features of Symantec Endpoint Encryption?

Centralized Management: Simplifies the control of encryption across all devices.
Robust Encryption: Protects data using advanced encryption standards.
Seamless Integration: Integrates smoothly with other software environments.
Remote Management: Allows for the management of devices from a distance.
Email Protection: Secures email communications.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Data Security: Ensures protection against data breaches and unauthorized access.
Compliance Adherence: Helps meet regulatory requirements, particularly in strict industries.
Ease of Use: Reduces the need for technical support and lowers training costs.

Symantec Endpoint Encryption is widely used in finance and government sectors, offering encryption solutions for emails, mobile devices, and critical documents. It addresses endpoint security and compliance, deploying both on-cloud and on-premises to safeguard drives, accounts, and data, crucial for clients with strict compliance policies.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Glatfelter

Citrix Systems Inc., City of Lansing, Commercial & Industrial Property, France T_l_visions, Fujian Mobile Co. Ltd., Group Lotus plc, Hall Booth Smith & Slover, P.C. (HBSS), Portugal Telecom, PostFinance, Public Pension Agency

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Broadcom, ESET and others in Endpoint Encryption. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.