We performed a comparison between Check Point NGFW and Sophos XG based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Check Point NGFW is praised for its extensive security features, centralized management, and virtualization capabilities. It is highly regarded in terms of comprehensive protection and adaptability. Sophos XG is known for its usability, user-friendly interface, and straightforward installation process. Both options provide robust threat defense and the ability to expand as needed.
Check Point NGFW, needs to improve various aspects, including integration with other infrastructures, hardware upgrades, cost and pricing, stability and security, UI, complexity issues, redundancy options, and memory management. Sophos XG needs improvements in antivirus features, graphical interface and performance, bandwidth management and VPN capabilities, reporting and user management, support and response time, and specific issues and feature requests.
Service and Support: Some customers have found Check Point NGFW's customer service to be helpful and responsive, while others believe there is room for improvement. Sophos XG's support has received both positive and negative feedback. Some customers have found it to be good and helpful, while others have been dissatisfied with unhelpful and unresponsive support.
Ease of Deployment: The initial setup for Check Point NGFW can range in difficulty, with some users finding it simple while others find it more challenging. Knowledge and experience may be required for certain configurations and migrations. The initial setup for Sophos XG is generally seen as uncomplicated and straightforward, although some users may struggle if they are unfamiliar with the product.
Pricing: Check Point NGFW is known for its high setup cost, particularly when compared to other products. Users find it challenging to add new licensing to existing devices, especially for larger enterprise-level devices. Sophos XG provides flexible pricing options based on the required functionality, offering reasonable and competitive pricing, particularly for educational institutions.
ROI: Check Point NGFW stands out for its cost savings, simplicity, and effective security enforcement. Sophos XG offers a high ROI by reducing support expenses and enhancing security practices.
Comparison Results: Sophos XG is the favored product when compared to Check Point NGFW. Users find the initial setup of Sophos XG to be simple. They appreciate the functionality and user interface of Sophos XG, as well as its extensive protection against threats. The pricing for Sophos XG is considered fair and the technical support is satisfactory.
"Fortinet FortiGate is stable. It's used across all the countries, this is the way most multinationals run their system."
"It works very well. It has a lot of different functionalities. Its cost is also fine for our customers."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiGate are the different types of profiling. It has been the most effective for me. The WAF and the antivirus profile are the most effective in network protection."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiGate are the APIs. They are the most widely known."
"The pricing is great and very reasonable."
"FortiGate improved our security. It's one of the best hardware firewalls."
"The signature database and zero-day detection are Fortinet FortiGate's most valuable features."
"I'm pretty happy with its reliability. It is also very scalable."
"The solution offers very good central management, which saves time and is hassle-free."
"The Check Point firewall features for Next Generation Firewalls are excellent."
"Check Point is more expensive but easier to manage, and their presales and after-sale support are way better than Fortinet's."
"We have not had any issues with the firewall."
"The Smart Dashboard allows for rule creation and administration and management and is user-friendly."
"Check Point NGFW has helped the company in the prevention of cyber attacks that could affect operations and slow down production."
"I haven't had any data leaks or vulnerability situations."
"It is always on the top of the list of best firewall solutions."
"One of the standout features of Sophos XG is its proprietary VPN technology known as RID (Remote Internet Device). This unique technology provides efficient branch connectivity without the need to invest in additional firewalls for each branch. By utilizing an affordable device called RED, users can effectively control and establish connections in a cost-effective manner. Additionally, the solution is feature-rich."
"The solution offers a good firewall endpoint and email encryption."
"I like the tunneling part which we are using for the VOIP. We have various other sites where we connect via tunneling. The tunneling part is very fast and easy to implement."
"Some of the most valuable features are filtering and application control. The DDoS detection also shows traffic jamming and traffic shaping."
"The stability of Sophos XG is good, it has good performance."
"The security of the solution, thanks to the built-in unified threat management, is one of its most valuable features. Plus, one single pane of glass is all you need to manage the whole solution, and web management can be done from anywhere."
"Everything is consolidated into a single box, offering comprehensive functionality, including Wi-Fi access and other features."
"The security of Sophos XG is very good."
"Tunnel flapping was one of the major things I had seen wherein your internet link remains but your VPN tunnel is down. However, since I got a fix from the TAC team, I have not noticed it, but the customer complained a few times that they couldn't access the internet because of this problem."
"The inability to scale the FortiAnalyzer to match our growth necessitates the purchase of new hardware."
"Currently, without the additional reporting module, we only have access to basic reporting."
"Their software support needs improvement. I would prefer to have better support for bug fixes. Sometimes, we open a ticket, and it is very difficult to get a solution. Specifically, we are not at all happy with their support for load balancing."
"The non-error conserve mode has room for improvement."
"It is very expensive, and their support is not very good. I hope that their technical support will be better in the future."
"Its reporting can be improved. Sometimes, I don't get proper reports."
"Pricing for it is a bit high. It could be cheaper."
"I would like to see Check Point add more cloud management features and better integration with LAN software-defined networking."
"Initially, we faced a few challenges with firmware. Later this was addressed with jumbo hotfixes."
"It's expensive, but its price is reasonable looking at its functionality and power"
"To enhance the user experience, Check Point should consider adopting an incremental upgrade approach, similar to competitors like Palo Alto or Fortinet, as it would help minimize downtime and streamline the upgrade process, making it more efficient and user-friendly."
"The URL objects take significant time in processing compared to other products like Cisco FTD; it would be better if they could improve it."
"The Check Point TAC support has, in recent years, deteriorated."
"Check Point could improve the time for delivering requested features from customers."
"At the moment it is not easy to configure some VPN S2S in Check Point."
"Sophos XG should improve on the GDPR features involving data protection and encryption. Security regarding data protection is important."
"It would be better if they made their own hardware like Palo Alto and Fortinet. They use their own ASICs and claim it is more secure."
"The support from the vendor needs to be improved."
"The security of Sophos XG could be improved."
"Lacks improved throughput performance in a box."
"Sophos XG could improve the connectivity with Microsoft 365 or Azure Active Directory(AD). It doesn't work directly as other solutions do, such as Fortinet FortiGate. The client needs a separate AD server which is a problem."
"Sophos XG could improve by being more stable and for it to be able to be used for large enterprises."
"We are facing some problems on this firmware version, version 18, that require improvement. We want to improve the email security because it doesn't give proper security with the data protection. Also, our clients are facing some problems where most of the sites which they're accessing are getting blocked. I want to improve those sites, that email security, and the data protection on the Firmware version 18."
Check Point NGFW is ranked 5th in Firewalls with 104 reviews while Sophos XG is ranked 7th in Firewalls with 40 reviews. Check Point NGFW is rated 8.8, while Sophos XG is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point NGFW writes "Robust control and security that enables a comprehensive application management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos XG writes "Secure, duel switch capabilities, and good support". Check Point NGFW is most compared with Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, Netgate pfSense, Azure Firewall, Cisco Secure Firewall and OPNsense, whereas Sophos XG is most compared with Netgate pfSense, OPNsense, Sophos XGS, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls and Untangle NG Firewall. See our Check Point NGFW vs. Sophos XG report.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.