Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point IPS vs Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point IPS
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Palo Alto Networks URL Filt...
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
7th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Check Point IPS is 5.1%, down from 8.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB is 2.4%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
 

Featured Reviews

Ramesh KumarPonram - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers great features like tunneling, hashing, and SSL
The area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required consist of support availability. The tool's complete operating system architecture is being designed in such a way that it looks a little complicated compared to the tool offered by its competitors. The tool's complete operating system architecture needs to be simplified for the users, especially from an administrative and troubleshooting perspective, so that it can be used quickly or with speed whenever there is a crisis. If the aforementioned areas are considered, the product will be much stronger. The tool's support is a major issue because it has not been quick in certain areas compared to the ones offered by Check Point's competitors. The product's scalability has certain shortcomings where improvements are required. The product should be able to handle and compete with competitors and their services as well as updates, which are much faster than Check Point.
Abdul  Basit - PeerSpot reviewer
Advanced features and robust support elevate overall network management experience
I think URL filtering could be better to some extent. Improvements could be made in Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB compared to Sophos. The URL filtering option in Palo Alto gives a very clear vision of the network and the applications using URL filtering. If you assign a user in a group not to access certain URLs, that user should only be allowed to access LinkedIn without running videos. However, deep URL filtering in Palo Alto is not configurable. One user can have access to LinkedIn with video running, while another cannot. They should improve this deep analysis of URL filtering options.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The autonomous threat prevention is very easy to use. The APIs and SmartConsole tool also work well."
"The notifications are the most valuable feature of the solution."
"It offers robust protection with features such as Next Generation firewall capabilities, mobile solutions, and proactive threat prevention."
"The IPS module offers protection against malicious inbound Internet traffic to our DMZ network and inspects and blocks outbound Internet traffic to sites that could be a danger to our internal users."
"The reports are useful in helping to verify the threats where we can see the level of severity in order to be able to take action."
"It is easy to configure."
"What I like best about Check Point IPS is that it can prevent attacks. I also like that it has a log feature."
"The solution's IPS functionality and firewall functionality are the solution's most valuable features."
"The initial setup is easy."
"Prohibited URLs can be listed by category."
"The URL categories are updated by Palo Alto Networks itself."
"It's allowed us to have better visibility and protection from threats."
"Real-time analysis is excellent, and the integration of the solution with our infrastructure is straightforward and less challenging."
"The Palo Alto solution has improved our organization by providing threat protection across a variety of internet connections. Our company also gets valuable insights regarding threat analysis."
"I do not have to use additional security solutions to block the URLs, as PAN-DB and URL filtering are both powerful tools when it comes to security."
"The most valuable feature is that the product can do everything in a single device, including the firewall, rules, and the PBL. It also has good routing and switching."
 

Cons

"The initial setup with Check Point IPS was slightly complex."
"Setting up Check Point IPS isn't easy, but it's not too complex, either. I rate it seven out of 10 for ease of setup. Generally, customers cannot do it themselves. They need an integrator."
"In my opinion, the Check Point software engineers should works on the performance of the blade - when it is activated with the big number of the protections in place, the monitoring shows us the significant increase in the CPU utilization for the gateway appliances - up to 30 percents, even so we are cherry-picking only the profiles that we really needed."
"The dashboard reports can be easier to generate and customize."
"We want the solution to continue to move towards cloud-based and portability focused for telecommuting users."
"The price has room for improvement."
"The service that we want to see in the future is a capacity to segment the IPS services by equipment."
"The area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required consist of support availability."
"It is an expensive solution and not everyone has the budget for it."
"Performance monitoring could use improvement."
"We have had some challenges with making Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB work with ELK stack."
"I think Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB is too costly compared to others."
"For hosting sites like Blogspot, they host sites that should be in different categories, but get lumped together in general. There needs to be more granularity or multiple categorizations."
"Support needs to be enhanced."
"Customer service is sometimes inconsistent. Some engineers are very knowledgeable, while others cannot answer questions and delay solutions."
"The main limitation is that it needs a live Internet connection for ongoing updates."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's licensing model is good. The licensing costs are yearly. I rate it an eight out of ten."
"The pricing is quite reasonable."
"I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one means it is very cheap and ten means it is very expensive. The product is expensive."
"Pricing for this solution is negotiable and I'm happy with our pricing."
"There is a license needed to use the Check Point IPS which is not expensive. However, the Check Point IPS device is expensive."
"It is a reasonably priced product."
"The price of this product should be reduced."
"I give the price of the solution a five out of ten."
"Expensive, but that's because it provides everything."
"It is more expensive than ASA but is far cheaper than Checkpoint. So, pricing wise, it is right in the middle."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
9%
University
8%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Performing Arts
9%
University
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point IPS?
The most valuable feature of the solution is called tunneling. Tunneling is one of the major security features that hackers cannot penetrate through.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point IPS?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point IPS has been satisfactory.
What needs improvement with Check Point IPS?
An area of improvement for Check Point IPS would be simplified configuration and performance optimization. The initial setup and tuning can be complex, and more guided wizards or templates would he...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB?
The licensing costs and setup costs are very expensive for us. The price is significantly higher compared to other competitive products.
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB?
I think URL filtering could be better to some extent. Improvements could be made in Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB compared to Sophos. The URL filtering option in Palo Alto gives a ve...
What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB?
We previously discussed Palo Alto Networks WildFire, and we are currently using it for our firewalls with the WildFire subscription included. We have micro-segmentation using the VMware environment...
 

Also Known As

Check Point Intrusion Prevention System
Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering PAN-DB
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Morton Salt, Medical Advocacy and Outreach, BH Telecom, Lightbeam Health Solutions, X by Orange, Cadence, Nihondentsu, Datastream Connexion, Good Sam, Omnyway, FIASA, Pacific Life, Banco del Pacifico, Control Southern, Xero, Centrify
TRI-AD, Telkom Indonesia
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point IPS vs. Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.