Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs ESET Endpoint Encryption comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Full Disk Encry...
Ranking in Endpoint Encryption
7th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Data Protection (4th)
ESET Endpoint Encryption
Ranking in Endpoint Encryption
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Endpoint Encryption category, the mindshare of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is 2.1%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ESET Endpoint Encryption is 19.9%, up from 13.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Encryption
 

Featured Reviews

Danit Sannikov - PeerSpot reviewer
Can be well-integrated with the existing systems in a company and is very intuitive to use
I once faced a problem with the tool, but I remember that I managed to work without a VPN, and then the problem with the product was sorted out somehow. An option to connect not only with the username and password but also through SMS in an easy manner is something that needs to be added to the tool. When I changed the way I connect to the tool to the SMS option, I did it because I bought a new phone, and it had a problem connecting with the tool, after which I had to go to the settings to change it, so I felt it was not very intuitive. In other platforms, the user will have two options to connect, one of which is with a username and password, and the other one is with an SMS.
Lucky  Lushaba - PeerSpot reviewer
Has an user-friendly UI which even a non-technical person can use
The product should be more responsive regarding feedback if it detects something in our infrastructure. I believe there's a backend that their engineers use to detect viruses in our system. We would appreciate it if they could promptly provide feedback and give us recommendations on how to better protect our infrastructure beyond their system. Additionally, we hope for improved integration with the other systems we currently use. It would be beneficial if they could collaborate to create something that facilitates integration between these systems.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It helps us maximize the operational efficiency and performance of our activities."
"It keeps the devices well monitored."
"This encryption is relatively fast and really covers the needs required."
"We never had any complaints about the performance of computers with this tool to be able to manage the protection of disks and drives."
"It has addressed storage and data transfer demands efficiently."
"It is a cross-platform tool."
"It's easily scalable and adaptable to the needs of the business."
"The product's initial setup phase is totally fine."
"This solution can be centrally managed."
"ESET Endpoint Encryption works as an antivirus system."
"The product is easy to implement and configure."
"The solution's UI is user-friendly. Even a non-technical person can use it."
"The most valuable feature is that everything is done on the server."
"The setup is getting easier."
"The usability is the most valuable feature."
"It is very secure and we have finally decided to use this after a thorough check. The interface is easy to navigate."
 

Cons

"The price is high for small scale business enterprises."
"While the solution works as it should, it is overly expensive."
"The response time for technical support could be faster."
"They should improve the interface and make it a little more user-friendly."
"Regarding the general topic of support, many have annoyances with it."
"There are a few cases of security breaches when the networking system fails and can lead to malware attacks. The next release should focus more on data virtualization and support for all computing devices."
"The tool should be able to recover data from a stolen device."
"They could improve the latency in the platform when entering the portal."
"Integration with central management needs improvement."
"My problem is that there's a technical glitch and they don't have a fix for it. It's not working with the latest version of Windows, which is a problem."
"The product should be more responsive regarding feedback if it detects something in our infrastructure. I believe there's a backend that their engineers use to detect viruses in our system. We would appreciate it if they could promptly provide feedback and give us recommendations on how to better protect our infrastructure beyond their system. Additionally, we hope for improved integration with the other systems we currently use. It would be beneficial if they could collaborate to create something that facilitates integration between these systems."
"I would like more robust reporting as part of the Remote Administrator."
"If you have issues with your network, you can't get updates, which is a problem."
"The initial setup could be made easier."
"There should be more frequent updates."
"The overall compatibility of the device is an area where the solution lacks."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As it costs $125 per workstation per year, something which is above the price of what the competition is charging, the solution is definitely too expensive."
"Instead of installing ESET on each machine at each location, we just do it remotely. This has been a time saver for us."
"ESET Endpoint Encryption is moderately priced."
"The National University System dedicates 500 of their 5000 licenses to us, which is $14/yr per device. Most companies are paying $99 or $120 per device a year."
"The pricing is mid-ranged and could be more cost-effective."
"There are some inexpensive products compared to ESET Endpoint Encryption, but they lack the essential features."
"It is neither very expensive, nor cheap. Overall it is affordable and there is a long term arrangement between our company and the solution providers for license."
"Licensing costs are on a yearly basis."
"We paid for an annual subscription, and it was reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Encryption solutions are best for your needs.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
27%
Security Firm
9%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Government
8%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?
The cost of licenses depends on the characteristics or implementation you are looking for.
What needs improvement with Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?
I once faced a problem with the tool, but I remember that I managed to work without a VPN, and then the problem with the product was sorted out somehow. An option to connect not only with the usern...
What needs improvement with ESET Endpoint Encryption?
My problem is that there's a technical glitch and they don't have a fix for it. It's not working with the latest version of Windows, which is a problem. My hands are kind of tied.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)
CCS Media Limited, Mercury Engineering, Unigarant, Pinewood Healthcare
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. ESET Endpoint Encryption and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.