IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why
  • Home
  • Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade vs. RPost RMail

Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade vs RPost RMail comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Better at catching both spam and malicious messages than the competition, and provides very granular rule setup
Users are getting a lot fewer malicious and nuisance messages. When we moved to the cloud product, we added in a service for graymail unsubscribe... Read more →
AnujVerma
Good logging, monitoring, and blocking capabilities
Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade has improved the performance outcome for our organization to a great extent as it helps in... Read more →
Use RPost RMail?
Buyer's Guide
Email Security
July 2022
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Proofpoint, Cisco, Microsoft and others in Email Security. Updated: July 2022.
DOWNLOAD NOW
619,967 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing was all transferred."
  • "Compared to Cisco's on-prem service, the cost is the same, but you don't have to pay for the hardware and you don't have to maintain the system, as far as upgrades and hardware failures are concerned. It is cheaper to operate on their cloud service than it is to operate with their on-prem service."
  • "Cisco Secure Email and the support are priced well. It's not cheap, but there are other solutions that offer less and cost so much. For example, Microsoft is more expensive than Cisco."
  • "There are additional fees for adding features."
  • "At times, we feel the pricing is a bit too high, but then, there is also room for discounts. We enjoy a lot of discounts, and that is why we are still with them. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
  • "In my previous organization, avoiding four instances of CryptoLocker within an estimated six month period is approximately $600,000 in lost time and effort. Our five year cost was about a million dollars, and the four outages that we had equated to 65 percent of that five year cost."
  • "It is a super big router that costs a few hundred thousand dollars."

    • More Cisco Secure Email Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Choosing the correct set of licenses is essential because, without the additional software blade licenses, the Check Point gateways are just a stateful firewall."
  • "The cost is competitive with other security products on the market."
  • "This is a simple system with a very low cost and basic functions, which surely is ideal for a small company."
  • "Reasonably priced solution."

    • More Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    619,967 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Cisco Secure Email?
    Top Answer:It has an intuitive, clear graphical interface where you can deploy your policies and understand the overall flow. There… more »
    Read all 23 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Secure Email?
    Top Answer:It is a super big router that costs a few hundred thousand dollars.
    Read all 14 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Cisco Secure Email?
    Top Answer:You can consolidate on SMA if you want to spam or threats quarantined for multiple devices. It is not advisable for a… more »
    Read all 23 answers   →
    What do you like most about Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Soft...
    Top Answer:This product integrates well and is easy to manage.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Soft...
    Top Answer:Determining areas for improvement is not a question that can be answered simply. I think we should separate the antispam… more »
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Securit...
    Top Answer:Like any company, we needed an antispam product so we implemented this solution. Buying this blade was convenient from… more »
    Read all 4 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Cisco Email Security, IronPort, Cisco Email Security, ESA, Email Security Appliances
    RMail
    Learn More
    Cisco
    Check Point
    RPost
    Overview

    Customers of all sizes face the same daunting challenge: email is simultaneously the most important business communication tool and the leading attack vector for security breaches. Cisco Email Security enables users to communicate securely and helps organizations combat Business Email Compromise (BEC), ransomware, advanced malware, phishing, spam, and data loss with a multilayered approach to security.

    Check Point Anti-Spam & Email Security provides comprehensive protection for messaging infrastructure. A multidimensional approach protects email infrastructure, provides highly accurate anti-spam coverage and defends organizations from a wide variety of virus and malware threats delivered within email.

    Learn more about Anti spam email security.

    RMail is an all-in-one solution for powerful email, with simple-to-use open tracking, delivery proof, email encryption, electronic signatures, large file transfer functionality and more.

    Offer
    Learn more about Cisco Secure Email
    Learn More
    Learn more about Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade
    Learn More
    Learn more about RPost RMail
    Learn More
    Sample Customers
    SUNY Old Westbury, CoxHealth, City of Fullerton, Indra
    SF Police Credit Union (SFPCU)
    The Graham Company, USDA
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Energy/Utilities Company19%
    Retailer14%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider23%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Government7%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider31%
    Computer Software Company30%
    Educational Organization5%
    Healthcare Company4%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise56%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise56%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Email Security
    July 2022
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Proofpoint, Cisco, Microsoft and others in Email Security. Updated: July 2022.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    619,967 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is ranked 20th in Email Security with 9 reviews while RPost RMail is ranked 50th in Email Security. Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is rated 7.2, while RPost RMail is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade writes "Good logging, monitoring, and blocking capabilities". On the other hand, Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is most compared with Barracuda Email Security Gateway, Fortinet FortiMail, Sophos Email, Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection and Microsoft Defender for Office 365, whereas RPost RMail is most compared with .

    See our list of best Email Security vendors.

    We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.