No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

ChatGPT Team - Enterprise vs PuppyGraph comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 7, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ChatGPT Team - Enterprise
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.7
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
AI Writing Tools (2nd), AI Code Assistants (7th), Large Language Models (LLMs) (2nd), AI Proofreading Tools (2nd)
PuppyGraph
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
NoSQL Databases (23rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

ChatGPT Team - Enterprise and PuppyGraph aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is designed for Large Language Models (LLMs) and holds a mindshare of 7.2%, down 11.4% compared to last year.
PuppyGraph, on the other hand, focuses on NoSQL Databases, holds 0.1% mindshare.
Large Language Models (LLMs) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ChatGPT Team - Enterprise7.2%
Google Gemini AI14.2%
DeepSeek10.0%
Other68.6%
Large Language Models (LLMs)
NoSQL Databases Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
PuppyGraph0.1%
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced11.3%
Cassandra8.8%
Other79.8%
NoSQL Databases
 

Featured Reviews

Neha Chhangani - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Analyst at a startup based organization
Collaborative workspace has transformed our content creation and daily team productivity
There is scope for improvement in ChatGPT Team - Enterprise regarding more customization of team behavior. Teams often want even finer control over how the assistant responds, including industry-specific tones, branding voice, or response constraints that apply only to certain teams within the organization. While the shared workspace is powerful, deeper integration with internal enterprise systems could enhance accuracy and relevance. Current team history features are useful, but some teams want more granular control over what is shared or archived, especially when dealing with sensitive topics. More flexible memory settings at the project or chat level and better usage analytics would be beneficial. Admins often want richer insights into how the team is using the platform, not just overall usage but impact metrics tied to business outcomes. Real-time collaboration is great, but there is room to grow in how teams co-author and annotate AI outputs together. Additional improvements would include domain-specific models. Some teams operate in highly specialized domains and want models tuned to their field. The option to load domain-specific language packs or fine-tuned models within the enterprise environment would be valuable. Teams sometimes want clearer insight into why the assistant responded a certain way, especially on complex queries, so adding an explain-why feature with brief reasoning steps or confidence indicators for responses would improve understanding. For ultra-sensitive deployments, some organizations prefer tools that can run without cloud dependency, so having a secure on-premise or private cloud deployment option with the same collaboration compatibilities would be beneficial. Further improvements needed for ChatGPT Team - Enterprise include the AI better understanding inter-team context. This would involve recognizing when a query relates to a previous project or department-specific knowledge to reduce repeated explanations or clarifications. While it handles many languages, more robust enterprise-grade multilingual capabilities, including idiomatic expressions and regional business terminologies, would help global teams collaborate more effectively. Allowing the AI to tailor responses based on the user's role makes output more precise and immediately actionable. For highly sensitive projects, having a secure offline mode or on-premises deployment would increase adoption in regulated industries.
Gurmeet K. - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Product Manager at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Unified graph querying has driven deep multi-hop reasoning and transformed data governance
There are multiple features of PuppyGraph that I personally love. One of them is zero-ETL graph querying, which helps us connect with our data warehouses easily and link via dynamic JSON graph schemas. This enables us to explore relational tables, nodes, and edges in under seven minutes, which previously took three and a half hours, so it is a great reduction. I also love the massive distributed graph scalability. The distributed vectorized compute engine helps us auto-shard queries across nodes and consistently execute 10-hop traversals across multi-billion edge data sets in under two seconds. Additionally, I appreciate the unified single source of truth. It helps us commit to the underlying tables, and those commits are immediately queryable in the graph layer within zero seconds of ETL replication lag. This ensures that our AI agents never reason over stale data and always access the latest data without any lag or changes left. The governance and security of PuppyGraph are very good, and I would rate it 10 out of 10 in that aspect. PuppyGraph's governance and security features have helped our organization, as it queries lakehouse tables directly where they originate. This delivers an exceptional governance posture for our enterprise applications with the help of inherent source-level governance and ABAC, which has supported the existing row-level security while helping us implement RBAC and column masking policies. It stabilizes operations inside Snowflake in our data warehouses and has achieved 100% policy consistency with zero security drift. The accuracy and reliability of PuppyGraph's output are really great.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"ChatGPT Team - Enterprise makes my life very easy because every time I have to look up something on Google, I have to search through multiple results, but ChatGPT Team - Enterprise provides information in a simpler view with the easiest format and in quite literally the simplest sentences."
"It is pretty valuable that we can set up prompts to define the context for conversations with ChatGPT Team - Enterprise, which enables it to stay the course during responses."
"Overall, ChatGPT Team - Enterprise was dependable for production use in a regulated financial context, which is not always a given with AI."
"From a business perspective, the ROI justifies the cost because of the time saved in troubleshooting, documentation, and automation."
"ChatGPT Team - Enterprise has helped us work smarter, not harder, and deliver better outcomes more quickly, with specific positive impacts including faster content and deliverables, better team alignment, smoother onboarding, higher quality outputs, and time saved on repetitive work."
"It provides details that previously took days or weeks to gather, and I can improve and get more insight on subjects with more accuracy."
"I have noticed clear time-saving benefits, particularly in documentation, code reviews, and internal knowledge sharing, and I estimate a 30 to 40 percent reduction in the time spent on repetitive technical tasks, which translates into faster time-to-market for features, improved marketing ROI through more experiments per quarter, and reduced agency spending via reusable content templates."
"After ChatGPT Team - Enterprise, my work has become easier and my daily life has become more convenient."
"PuppyGraph is the best answer."
"PuppyGraph has positively impacted our organization by driving transformative capital efficiency across our pipeline infrastructure, our storage footprint, and our product delivery."
 

Cons

"The information base of ChatGPT has to grow because, in some cases, it does not include information about my city."
"If you ask it the same question twice, it gives you a slightly different answer, which even a human being does unless it memorizes something."
"Whenever we try to buy a token or subscription, it takes a considerable amount of money, so for one person, it charges a lot, making it slightly on the expensive side."
"Filtering the database based on indexes is difficult in Rockset and should be simplified."
"Third is the cost at scale, as API costs added up quickly as document volumes grew."
"There are issues of cost and viability, with various concerns around these aspects, but that would be a great enhancement for us."
"They have room for improvements in search as sometimes it gives out wrong information."
"More real-time DevOps integration features should be added, and better long-session memory handling should also be improved."
"PuppyGraph is not a long-term solution as it is a virtual graph. Eventually, after we get the model right, we needed to move to Memgraph, another graph database."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Large Language Models (LLMs) solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
14%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Outsourcing Company
10%
University
9%
Construction Company
27%
Insurance Company
24%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise10
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ChatGPT?
ChatGPT Team - Enterprise needs to improve by reducing its complexity. The main issue is that the LLM they are using gives different suggestions and does not give a specific outcome, which is very ...
What is your primary use case for ChatGPT?
My main use case for ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is to make codes and write code in different languages so that every team member can understand it. Recently, while working on a project, I encountere...
What advice do you have for others considering ChatGPT?
I advise using different plugins to get good lines of code. I gave this product a rating of 7 out of 10.
What needs improvement with PuppyGraph?
PuppyGraph is a virtual graph and not a real graph data model. However, at some point in time, once we freeze this as the graph and the graph data model, we would like to extend to a proper graph, ...
What is your primary use case for PuppyGraph?
The main use case for PuppyGraph is establishing a graph data model layer on top of our existing systems. We do not want to bring in a new product which is completely graph-oriented, mainly because...
What advice do you have for others considering PuppyGraph?
There are no concrete recommendations. The important thing is that if they have to choose PuppyGraph, they need to have the clarity that PuppyGraph is not a long-term solution. Only if they have a ...
 

Also Known As

Rockset
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. Cisco 3. Comcast 4. DoorDash 5. Expedia 6. Facebook 7. GitHub 8. IBM 9. Lyft 10. Microsoft 11. Netflix 12. Oracle 13. Pinterest 14. Reddit 15. Salesforce 16. Slack 17. Spotify 18. Square 19. Target 20. Twitter 21. Uber 22. Verizon 23. Visa 24. Walmart 25. Yelp 26. Zoom 27. Airbnb 28. Dropbox 29. eBay 30. Google 31. LinkedIn 32. Amazon
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, OpenAI, Cohere and others in Large Language Models (LLMs). Updated: October 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.