• Home
  • CGI TestSavvy vs. ImpactQA Test Automation Services

CGI TestSavvy vs ImpactQA Test Automation Services comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
1st
out of 36 in Test Automation Services
Views
174
Comparisons
59
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
11th
out of 36 in Test Automation Services
Views
48
Comparisons
28
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
TestSavvy
Learn More
CGI
Video Not Available
ImpactQA
Video Not Available
Overview

CGI TestSavvy is transforming the world of application quality assurance (QA) testing with a unique and compelling approach to test automation.

Automating software products and applications at ImpactQA is performed with an aim to reduce regression testing time and time-to-market. Ouryears of experience and shining reputation among top automation testing companies have strengthened our engagement with global clients from different industry domains. ImpactQA and its test automation approach involve best in class tools for functional regression automation and webapplication automation testing partnered with creation & maintenance of automated test suites

Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Government31%
Computer Software Company19%
Manufacturing Company14%
Energy/Utilities Company12%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise71%
No Data Available

CGI TestSavvy is ranked 1st in Test Automation Services while ImpactQA Test Automation Services is ranked 11th in Test Automation Services. CGI TestSavvy is rated 0.0, while ImpactQA Test Automation Services is rated 0.0. On the other hand, CGI TestSavvy is most compared with , whereas ImpactQA Test Automation Services is most compared with .

See our list of best Test Automation Services vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.