Centreon vs Goliath Performance Monitor comparison

Centreon and Goliath Technologies are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Centreon is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.3, while Goliath Technologies is ranked #70. Centreon holds a 1.6% mindshare in IM, compared to Goliath Technologies’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Goliath Technologies users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

8,544 Views
6,152 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Goliath Performance Monitor

Read 5 Goliath Performance Monitor reviews

1,423 Views
1,323 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Centreon

Goliath Performance Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Centreon and Goliath Performance Monitor are competitors in the network and application performance monitoring market. Goliath Performance Monitor holds an advantage due to its advanced features, which make it attractive for tech buyers interested in comprehensive solutions despite its higher price.

Features: Centreon provides valuable features such as comprehensive network monitoring, customizable dashboards, and integrations with ITSM tools. Goliath Performance Monitor is noted for its detailed application monitoring, proactive troubleshooting, and end-user experience monitoring.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Centreon and Goliath Performance Monitor have robust deployment options. Centreon is recognized for quicker implementation. Goliath Performance Monitor offers superior customer service with dedicated support for complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: Centreon is associated with lower initial setup costs and quicker ROI, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. Goliath Performance Monitor, despite higher initial costs, offers long-term ROI due to its comprehensive monitoring and application performance insights.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. Goliath Performance Monitor Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Goliath Performance Monitor

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,948 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

27th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (27th), Cloud Monitoring Software (21st)

Goliath Performance Monitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

70th

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Centreon is 1.6%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Goliath Performance Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	1.6%
Goliath Performance Monitor	0.5%
Other	97.9%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

networke29316

Senior Systems Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 201-500 employees

Monitors well with Citrix, stable, and the support is very responsive

It looks like it is easy to scale, but I don't know how far it can go out. We are only a 300, or 400 person company. We are not terribly large. It looks like it should be able to scale up until 10,000 at least. There are two users in the company who use this solution, I use it, and the helpdesk.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the remote server functionality on some customer sites, because you can see an independent view and are not dependent on a single connection. If you have branch offices or bigger office outside your headquarters, you can use remote servers because if the connection is broken or disrupted, then remote server will obtain a view of your environment and server availability. This is a good point against using other solutions. Because with other solutions, you don't have this feature. Then, you will be blind if you have this type of a situation."

"It provides visibility into the network."

"Centreon enables us to proactively take action on issues before they even become incidents, which significantly reduces business disruptions resulting from controllable factors."

"Centreon helps me detect where the problem is quickly. When we resolve a problem quickly, this lowers our overall costs."

"If they have the same issues that we had, which means a lot of pollers spread across the whole infrastructure and no central view to look at the entire status with the need to manage everything together, then it is a good solution."

"We are alerted on service impacts and not when something is down. We have saved a lot of time on non-business-hours intervention."

"Centreon's most valuable features are preventative maintenance and cost-efficiency. Everything is monitored, and we get a log before the system fails. We have an opportunity to fix the issue and avoid downtime."

"I can't point to one valuable feature. All of Centreon is good."

More Centreon pros

"My overall conclusion is that it is a valuable product for simulating Citrix logons because it does it with minimal effort and with a real user account."

"I would definitely give them high praise for what they do, and for being a special niche product."

"I think Goliath offers a very good tool to do simulated Citrix logons with actual user accounts and that the reports are useful to monitor and debug a session."

"I like that it not only has the ability to monitor but that it can do a lot of specific Citrix monitoring."

"I like that the solution offers a diversity of things; it can give you resource monitoring, it can be integrated to detect an application crash, to capture syslog, things like that, and I like the diversity of the dashboard."

"In conclusion, I think Goliath Performance Monitor is a true winner."

"Offers a diversity of features."

Cons

"Sometimes, when the GUI and some of the search fields are being reset, and I return to the page, then I have to set them again. Therefore, some improvement on the UI and the filtering is needed."

"There are improvements that they need to make to their API. When we're using different systems and we want to disable monitoring for a specific server, we still can't do that through the API. That's something that's lacking."

"Centreon is very bad with auto-scanning. It's very monolithic software. It doesn't have microservices and it only has basic clustering. You cannot, for example, have six or seven nodes for Centreon's cloud processes."

"This solution lacks service monitoring in the cloud."

"To get it started is a lot of work, since it comes empty. We had to push information into it to make it work."

"I would like to see more plugins. That is something it needs. There is also room for improvement through dynamic thresholds, or self-discover thresholds. I would also like to see a discovery feature that could map the whole network environment and automatically suggest things."

"The most important issue is the capability to interconnect with other systems. It already exists for some of them. For example, the Stream Connector is something we use to populate data in another system. This kind of facility for connecting should exist for all products that it makes sense to have connected to a monitoring solution."

"Where Centreon is weaker is that the initial deployment could be easier."

More Centreon cons

"With Goliath IT Monitors, the processing speed is very slow."

"Issues with generating reports; consistency is not there."

"Hardware requirements of the management server are kind of steep, 4cpu is quite a number."

"However, its GUI can use a little help. The navigation is not the most straightforward like many other monitoring tools."

"The setup is a bit complex."

"I would love to be able to tell what ISP the user is coming from."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is cheaply priced."

"They only sell four hour slots for support, so if you have just one question, then you need to pay for four hours. Or, you need to wait until you have enough questions to fill those four hours. They are not flexible in this."

"It's quite expensive when you use the Enterprise version, but if you compare it to other providers, it's more like a middle-of-the-line product. It's always good to have a price that is lower, but I would say the price is okay because we get very good support and if we have any other issues we can always contact them. There has never been a time when I didn't get help from them."

"If you need basic monitoring without dashboards, just monitoring, the plugins are very useful and really cheap. If you want a more complete solution with dashboards and reporting, the EMS solution is great and it is not that much more expensive. It's a good value. Really good."

"I would like to see improvement in the licensing model. You can purchase X number of licenses, up to 1,000 devices or 1,000 instances. Your next batch is 2,000. But what if you only need, say, 1,200? The model could be changed a little bit."

"You purchase a package. You have a support contract (there is also a platinum support contract) and it is per module. That means you have to pay, e.g., for the MBI module or the BAM module. Or, if you want to save a lot of money, you can pay for IMP, which is the complete package."

"In terms of licensing, you have to think through if the components that need licensing are really needed. For example, the Map module: If you don't need a map to be shown, I don't see a point in paying for those licenses, if you just use it a couple of times a month or a couple of times a week... You can use the Centreon free version and get the main features. The licensing part is, I would say, only for bigger customers who have the option to pay more and who really need those kinds of modules, fancy reports, etc."

"The pricing is acceptable."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

"The price seems reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 8% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

ControlUp vs Goliath Performance Monitor

Compared 17% of the time

eG Enterprise vs Goliath Performance Monitor

Compared 16% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Goliath Performance Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Goliath Performance Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs Goliath Performance Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

More Goliath Performance Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

August 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

Goliath Performance Monitor

August 2026

Download Goliath Performance Monitor product report

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

Goliath Performance Monitor delivers comprehensive monitoring to ensure optimal IT performance. Its robust set of tools provides actionable insights for various IT environments, aiding in maintaining system functionality and user satisfaction through real-time data and alerts.

Designed to meet complex IT demands, Goliath Performance Monitor is a reliable choice for organizations aiming to enhance system performance and troubleshoot issues effectively. It supports a range of environments, offering real-time alerts and detailed reporting that empowers IT professionals to make informed decisions promptly. By focusing on user experience, it maximizes efficiency, promising improved service delivery and performance.

What are the key features of Goliath Performance Monitor?

Real-Time Alerts: Provides immediate notifications to prevent system downtime.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed insights to facilitate in-depth analysis.
Deployment Flexibility: Supports on-premise and cloud infrastructure management.

What benefits should you expect from Goliath Performance Monitor?

Reduced Downtime: Keeps systems operational through proactive monitoring.
Increased Efficiency: Streamlines IT processes with advanced analytics.
Cost Savings: Decreases overhead by optimizing resource use.

Goliath Performance Monitor is particularly beneficial in industries like healthcare and finance, where its monitoring capabilities enhance system reliability and service quality. Its integration into hospital networks, for instance, supports uninterrupted patient care and regulatory compliance through consistent system uptimes.

Goliath Technologies

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

Walmart, Facebook, Xerox, UHS, ADP, Wyndham Worldwide

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Goliath Performance Monitor

August 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. Goliath Performance Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. Goliath Performance Monitor and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. Goliath Performance Monitor report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.