Centreon vs DX Performance Management comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Centreon and Broadcom are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Centreon is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.7, while Broadcom is ranked #38 with an average rating of 9.0. Centreon holds a 1.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to Broadcom’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

9,804 Views
7,745 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

DX Performance Management

Read 32 DX Performance Management reviews

5,323 Views
4,045 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Centreon

DX Performance Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Centron and DX Performance Management compete in the monitoring solutions category. Centreon appears to have an advantage due to its integrative capabilities and customizable dashboards, while DX Performance Management is favored for comprehensive metrics and integration with CA products.

Features: Centreon supports single-platform monitoring of diverse devices, customizable dashboards, and extensive plugins. It excels in scalability and seamless integration. DX Performance Management offers excellent performance metrics, customizable reports, and is deeply integrated with CA products, making it suitable for comprehensive network visibility.

Room for Improvement: Centreon users seek enhanced scalability, better cloud monitoring capabilities, and more customizable alerts. Visibility in template inheritance and 24/7 support are areas needing improvement. DX Performance Management could use more intuitive configuration options, better client-specific customization, and improved alerting for critical metrics. Enhanced integration and high-availability features during data transitions are requested by users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Centreon offers deployment flexibility across hybrid cloud and public cloud environments, while DX Performance Management focuses on on-premise deployments. Centreon's customer service is generally well-received, despite some limitations in real-time support and language barriers. DX Performance Management's customer service is praised for responsiveness but could improve with more comprehensive training resources.

Pricing and ROI: Centreon is perceived as affordable, with flexible pricing for large implementations alongside an open-source version that reduces initial costs. While DX Performance Management uses straightforward device-based licensing attractive to service providers, Centreon offers cost reductions through resource management. DX benefits from bundled solutions, although users appreciate Centreon's significant cost savings from product consolidation.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. DX Performance Management Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. DX Performance Management

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,749 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

24th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (27th), Cloud Monitoring Software (22nd)

DX Performance Management

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

38th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure Capacity Planning (1st), DX NetOps (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Centreon is 1.1%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of DX Performance Management is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	1.1%
DX Performance Management	0.8%
Other	98.1%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

reviewer1810893

Senior IT Operations Specialist at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Flexibility and detailed performance stats enable effective network monitoring

Spectrum is very good at monitoring all network faults and configurations. It enables me to take action based on network issues. The Performance Management provides detailed network performance stats, including CPU, memory, and interface bandwidth. Additionally, Spectrum is flexible and allows me to organize and treat devices uniquely without impacting other devices.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Centreon's real-time monitoring, despite having some manual aspects, supports us in managing our operations effectively."

"The customizable reports and dashboards are really flexible. We started this partnership with Centreon, when we were looking for a solution, because of the flexibility of the reporting. That's what we found to be most attractive in the solution. You can display the data as you want."

"Centreon's user-friendly dashboard and minimal resource requirements lead to significant time and cost savings."

"The dashboards are valuable because they ease troubleshooting and viewing. It becomes easier to locate the source of a problem... The dashboards make it easier to communicate with our clients. They don't want to see the alert console, they want to see a beautiful dashboard representing their network and their business and to watch it in case something is wrong in their environment."

"Centreon's most valuable feature is Opsgenie."

"We have all our tickets inside Centreon in real-time and can monitor a lot of ELP and CLN in real-time for application purposes."

"Centreon's most valuable features are preventative maintenance and cost-efficiency. Everything is monitored, and we get a log before the system fails. We have an opportunity to fix the issue and avoid downtime."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that most of its plug-ins are free."

More Centreon pros

"The licensing is very straightforward; it doesn't matter how many devices you have and would like to monitor, it's very straightforward."

"The out-of-the-box dashboards are valuable, in terms of being able to visualize performance data in ways that we haven't in the past."

"In the last three years, it has had a great improvement in its stability; it is great that it works and we have had no outages in this time."

"Mainly as an MSP configuration, the multi-tenant model helps us to segment the customer and users, as well as providing our operation the capability to oversee all tenants."

"The integration to the other products that we use: NFA, we use ADA, we use Spectrum; and CAPM integrates all those into a single pane of glass, for performance."

"I can get it to run a report showing, for instance, what root drives are in the critical range in terms of being full, like 90 percent full, and disseminate that information to the other areas of the organization."

"It is easy to use, and the performance metrics are helping us to know our network better."

"What is most useful is visibility."

More DX Performance Management pros

Cons

"I would like to see more plugins. That is something it needs. There is also room for improvement through dynamic thresholds, or self-discover thresholds. I would also like to see a discovery feature that could map the whole network environment and automatically suggest things."

"The pricing setup costs and licensing weren't very good in the past."

"Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed."

"It is necessary to improve service monitoring of database services in the free version."

"I would like to see a better UI, one which is more responsive."

"The scalability of Centreon is very bad because of the nature of the software."

"Response times can be slow, often leaving us to resolve basic issues in-house."

"Opening a ticket on the website of Centreon can be difficult for my colleague, but not for me because my English is good. However, my colleague doesn't speak English well, as our company is in Quebec and our first language is French."

More Centreon cons

"I'm not a fan of many extra features since they usually burden the software and reduce its reliability."

"Policies could be improved."

"I would like to have more tasks, graphs, and possibilities for linking to the graphs and reports added to the solution."

"This may be available by now but for server space, when it comes to the disk file system, I'd like to see that graphically represented, or the trend, rather than what I'm seeing now."

"Even though we can see when something is not available, it would also be it would be nice if some sort of alerting took place to that you could know immediately if something went down."

"We would like to be capable of reporting network performance with a report strictly focused on the times outside business hours, which CA PM does not currently support. We have discontinued the use of the Business Hours Filtering until CA engineers are able to resolve or offer guidance."

"There are some issues. We started supporting UTA and began to see both major and minor problems."

"This solution's implementation process could be quicker. They could also optimize the hardware requirements."

More DX Performance Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think Centreon's pricing is fair, especially given the criticality of our system. They were cheaper than the other solutions. The licensing terms were pretty straightforward. I believe it was based on the number of hosts."

"The pricing works out well for us, given our environment and where we are."

"In terms of licensing, you have to think through if the components that need licensing are really needed. For example, the Map module: If you don't need a map to be shown, I don't see a point in paying for those licenses, if you just use it a couple of times a month or a couple of times a week... You can use the Centreon free version and get the main features. The licensing part is, I would say, only for bigger customers who have the option to pay more and who really need those kinds of modules, fancy reports, etc."

"The solution has a free part and after that threshold, you will need to pay. For example, if you believe you can create an interesting map, most of the time, you will have to pay 10,000 Euros per year for having access to these components."

"It's quite expensive when you use the Enterprise version, but if you compare it to other providers, it's more like a middle-of-the-line product. It's always good to have a price that is lower, but I would say the price is okay because we get very good support and if we have any other issues we can always contact them. There has never been a time when I didn't get help from them."

"I would like to see improvement in the licensing model. You can purchase X number of licenses, up to 1,000 devices or 1,000 instances. Your next batch is 2,000. But what if you only need, say, 1,200? The model could be changed a little bit."

"The tool is cheaply priced."

"You purchase a package. You have a support contract (there is also a platinum support contract) and it is per module. That means you have to pay, e.g., for the MBI module or the BAM module. Or, if you want to save a lot of money, you can pay for IMP, which is the complete package."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

"Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year."

"The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices."

"We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. "

"We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable."

"They should provide more scalable licensing for the product."

"I like the licensing model because it's device-based."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,749 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

23%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX Performance Management?

Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected. It requires manual discovery and rebuilding of the topology, which I hope can be im...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX Performance Management?

I have used Spectrum for monitoring all network faults, configurations, and troubleshooting network issues. It provides network performance stats, such as CPU, memory, and interface bandwidth detai...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering DX Performance Management?

I would recommend this solution based on its functionality, flexibility, customizability, and ease of use. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. I am just a customer and not a par...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 8% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Kentik vs Centreon

Compared 3% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

Zabbix vs DX Performance Management

Compared 6% of the time

Icinga vs DX Performance Management

Compared 5% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX Performance Management

Compared 5% of the time

ScienceLogic vs DX Performance Management

Compared 5% of the time

Spiceworks vs DX Performance Management

Compared 3% of the time

More DX Performance Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

November 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management

November 2026

Download DX Performance Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

CA Performance Management

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

DX Performance Management provides crucial network visibility and performance monitoring, offering device certification, integration with key tools, and efficient network analytics through advanced features.

DX Performance Management is a comprehensive solution for network performance, health, and capacity monitoring. It facilitates baselining, trending, and real-time visibility, aiding in capacity planning and incident alerting. It integrates with services like NetFlow, NFA, and ADA, supporting multiple device types. Its database performance allows for efficient analysis with scalability across different device counts, while customizable dashboards provide a single-pane-of-glass view for network insights.

What are the key features of DX Performance Management?

Device Certification: Ensures network devices meet specific standards and requirements through thorough certification processes.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with NetFlow, NFA, ADA, Spectrum, and CAPC for robust network insights.
Report Generation: Offers automated report generation for enhanced network analysis.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides a tailored view of network performance metrics on a single screen.
Advanced Alerting: Monitors network conditions with sophisticated alerting mechanisms for proactive responses.
Scalability: Adapts to growing network demands with efficient performance across multiple device counts.
Multi-Tenancy: Supports various tenants within the same infrastructure, ensuring resource optimization.
Historical Data Analysis: Delivers past performance data for in-depth trend analysis and decision support.

Which benefits and ROI should users expect from using DX Performance Management?

Efficiency: Enhances network analysis through fast database performance and customizable interfaces.
Decision-Making: Improves decision support via comprehensive visibility and detailed performance metrics.
Scalability: Offers a flexible solution capable of growing with network demands.
Customization: Allows tailoring of reports and dashboards to meet specific analytical needs.
Integration: Provides seamless connectivity with other network management tools and service desks.

Network service providers implement DX Performance Management to deliver in-depth insights, monitoring routers and switches for SNMP data collection, aiding CPU, memory, and interface utilization analysis. It's integrated with network fault management and service desks, providing comprehensive performance analytics.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. DX Performance Management

November 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. DX Performance Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. DX Performance Management and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,749 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. DX Performance Management report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.