We performed a comparison between CentOS and Windows 11 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Operating Systems (OS) for Business solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the limited resources the solution uses in operation."
"The user interface of CentOS is intuitive, we can also use the command prompt."
"The user access level is most valuable. When you do administration with CentOS, the number of customizations that you can do for each user is higher than other solutions. It is very customizable."
"It's less expensive than Red Hat."
"The solution is open source."
"CentOS is very easy to use, and all the commands are user-friendly."
"The open architecture is useful for us. That's why we're using CentOS."
"Very robust and easy to work with."
"Windows 11 has a very straightforward initial setup."
"The most valuable aspect is the seamless integration and robust compatibility of other tools."
"It is a stable solution."
"I use the tool for work which includes emails, using the internet, etc."
"Quick Assist is a valuable feature."
"One valuable feature is the ability to snap windows to different sections of the screen, which is especially useful on big screens."
"The most valuable feature is animation. It is a good solution in terms of performance."
"We use Windows 11 for our workstation’s daily operations."
"Updates are going to a streaming version."
"Integration with other platforms could be improved."
"It could be more secure."
"The product lacks a graphical user interface that can help users automate certain systems using the native features offered by CentOS."
"CentOS could be improved by being more secure. Of course, we use a firewall, but security is always a concern."
"In terms of commands, it's all CLI and there isn't any GUI which can make it challenging to use for some people."
"CentOS could improve by having troubleshooting logs."
"When comparing the GUI of CentOS to Microsoft Windows or Mac, it could improve."
"Sometimes, I experience slowness in Windows 11, and its speed could be improved."
"When I was using Winsel, a tool for the existing purpose, and completing the purpose of that is to complete the file, it would show an error and ask me to purchase the product. But now, instead of giving the product, we have a patch to loop the tool. This happened via dot key dot shared and dot bat solutions. So, that kind of convenience has not been provided in Windows 11."
"The user interface could be easier to operate when searching for more options."
"The product's price, performance, and implementation accessibility need improvement."
"In terms of improvement, I have noticed some latency issues when loading large Excel or Word files."
"The solution must improve its aesthetics."
"The Android subscription does not support all devices. It should be extended to all devices."
"The product’s performance needs improvement."
CentOS is ranked 5th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 63 reviews while Windows 11 is ranked 10th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 39 reviews. CentOS is rated 8.2, while Windows 11 is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CentOS writes "Allows you to securely store data, and command prompts make it simple to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows 11 writes "An easy-to-use solution that can be used for desktop computing". CentOS is most compared with Oracle Linux, Ubuntu Linux, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), Windows Server and SUSE Linux Enterprise, whereas Windows 11 is most compared with Windows Server, Ubuntu Linux, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), Rocky Linux and SUSE Linux Enterprise. See our CentOS vs. Windows 11 report.
See our list of best Operating Systems (OS) for Business vendors.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
