Catchpoint vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant comparison

Catchpoint and Juniper are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Catchpoint is ranked #58 with an average rating of 8.0, while Juniper is ranked #49 with an average rating of 9.0. Catchpoint holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to Juniper’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Catchpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

Catchpoint

Read 14 Catchpoint reviews

1,557 Views
623 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Read 2 Marvis Virtual Network Assistant reviews

350 Views
273 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Catchpoint

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Catchpoint and Marvis Virtual Network Assistant compete in the network performance monitoring sector. Catchpoint has an advantage in pricing and support, while Marvis stands out with comprehensive features deemed worth the investment.

Features: Catchpoint provides synthetic monitoring, detailed network visibility, and performance bottleneck identification. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant offers AI-driven insights, automated troubleshooting, and advanced problem-solving capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Catchpoint could enhance AI integration, expand automated troubleshooting, and improve user interface intuitiveness. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant could lower initial cost, provide more manual control options, and offer broader third-party integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Catchpoint deployment is straightforward with solid customer support for seamless integration. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant simplifies setup with AI and provides proactive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Catchpoint offers competitive pricing, yielding good ROI with comprehensive analytics. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant presents higher initial costs but offers superior ROI through automation, reducing long-term expenses and increasing efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Catchpoint vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,077 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Catchpoint

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

58th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (37th), Cloud Monitoring Software (31st), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (10th)

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

49th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Catchpoint is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

AnmolRai

Technical Consultant Project Lead at Capgemini

Valuable monitoring features enhance ecommerce experience while improvement needed in region-specific insights

As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues. We are currently using an external tool, Splunk, for reporting. If we could receive similar data for the China market as we do for North America and Asia Pacific, this would be helpful.

Read full review

PRADIPJOSHI

Owner at Shree Atharva Sales Corporation

Used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts and works on artificial intelligence

I always recommend Marvis to every customer because it requires no additional direct involvement. Marvis has been developed well using AI and machine learning technology. Its AI engine updates itself regularly, which is a beneficial feature. I request that Juniper integrate a cloud identity engine and simplify the Microsoft Azure Active Directory Services integration with the SRX hardware firewall. Additionally, the SRX firewall needs a more robust graphical user interface. Currently, we can only configure the SRX using the CLI; if a wrong command is entered, restoring it cannot be easy. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature in Catchpoint is the alert or the notification my company gets frequently, in particular, every five minutes. It's the notification you get whenever a respective market has an issue. There's also a dashboard in Catchpoint that shows the markets you support, so all the markets will be highlighted graphically in the dashboard whenever there's downtime that could affect you. If there's no issue for a specific market, it will be in green, so in this way, anybody would be able to understand which market has issues and which market has no issues through Catchpoint. The tool is very useful for monitoring activities."

"Catchpoint helped us establish that something is in a provider network, so we could tell our customers to check their internet provider because the traffic is not getting to us. You need to be gentle when you tell them that, but the fact that we could do it was crucial."

"Catchpoint's customer service and support are valuable."

"We really need the API monitoring, as well as client side session monitoring, the global synthetic monitoring, to track the availability of the systems from the customer side."

"The most valuable features of Catchpoint are basically the transaction monitors on the API and UI."

"One of the features, the scatter plot, is very useful. It shows red dots wherever there are issues."

"The drill-down feature of this product was very good. It allowed us to identify the exact page or area of the site that was causing our customers an issue."

"The solution offers three different ways of slicing data to look for abnormalities."

More Catchpoint pros

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant uses AI to find problems or to get information from devices."

"If you ask any questions about Marvis, it will respond immediately and use some solution. It will be very easy and save you time."

Cons

"Catchpoint can be improved by focusing solely on network monitoring."

"There are essentially a lot of quotas. Nobody wants to sit and manually create monitors for someone who uses synthetic monitoring."

"if we need to do performance analysis, we have to click too many times. For example, if there is an issue that is caught by Catchpoint, we need to understand what the error is and at which step it failed, or which transaction that is impacted. To drill down, we have to click too many things to get the answer."

"It would be great if Catchpoint could incorporate its alerting system instead of relying on separate tools like ServiceNow."

"A room for improvement in Catchpoint is that it lacks an automated page updating feature. My company receives all the alerts and notifications it needs, but the page doesn't update automatically. You need to manually refresh the page, so every five minutes you need to refresh it to see the most updated information. If there's an automated page refresh feature, that would help my company. It's a feature that Grafana has. The page auto-refreshes in Grafana, so you don't have to manually refresh the page. If that feature is implemented in Catchpoint, it'll be useful for the users. Another area for improvement in the tool is you have to do a manual task, for example, when you have a notification for a market, you get a zip code that the user could have entered, but if the zip code is incorrect, you have to manually go into Catchpoint and update that parameter, so that manual step is another area in the tool that needs improvement."

"There's still too much manual involvement in getting customized test configurations out there. It's good, but it still takes a lot of effort. In other words, it's when you need to configure it to collect a specific variable and that kind of thing."

"We would like the script creation feature of this solution to be improved, as it currently requires a complicated manual process to update the scripts."

"The old user version was better, it was more user-friendly."

More Catchpoint cons

"It would be a good idea to integrate the solution to support other vendors besides Juniper."

"It should add real-time application visibility."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models."

"The pricing is based on consumption and works on a point scale. For example, let's say I want to look at www.google.com, and I'm going to test it to see if it's there. It will bring back all this data that tells me how long it took to connect and how long it took to get the first byte. It will list all the resources on the page, showing that they all work and there are no broken links. It brings that data back. That test has an assigned point value depending on what you decide to extract from that test. If all I do is check to see whether it's available, it might be one point. I don't know the exact point values off-hand. This is just an example."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to the last tool we were using."

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher."

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,077 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Educational Organization

13%

Retailer

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

23%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Catchpoint?

Catchpoint is very flexible and also provides logs for troubleshooting purposes. It helps us fix issues within the SLAs signed with the end users. The tool is easy to learn.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Catchpoint?

The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models. Clients typically see significant operational and cost efficiencies, with time savings estimated between 30% and 40%.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Catchpoint?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It should add real-time application visibility. Marvis's interface is good. We don't need any additional interface. However, if it could accept voice commands, that would be a great improvement

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It is mainly used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts. Marvis makes it easy to track the issue by providing specific information, like the exact time the connection was lost. It simp...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Catchpoint

Compared 24% of the time

Datadog vs Catchpoint

Compared 14% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint

Compared 13% of the time

New Relic vs Catchpoint

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Catchpoint

Compared 7% of the time

More Catchpoint Competitors

HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 36% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 25% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 21% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 18% of the time

More Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint

July 2025

Download Catchpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

July 2025

Download Marvis Virtual Network Assistant product report

Overview

Catchpoint is the Internet Resilience Company™. The top online retailers, Global2000, CDNs, cloud service providers, and xSPs in the world rely on Catchpoint to increase their resilience by catching any issues in the Internet Stack before they impact their business. Catchpoint’s Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) suite offers synthetics, RUM, performance optimization, high fidelity data and flexible visualizations with advanced analytics. It leverages thousands of global vantage points (including inside wireless networks, BGP, backbone, last mile, endpoint, enterprise, ISPs, and more) to provide unparalleled observability into anything that impacts your customers, workforce, networks, website performance, applications, and APIs.

Learn more at: https://www.catchpoint.com/

Catchpoint

Marvis is the first network assistant in the industry to bring conversational AI to networking, transforming the way IT teams interact and engage with enterprise networks. In the era of AIOps, Marvis delivers streamlined operations, simplified troubleshooting, and remarkable user experiences.

Juniper

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

July 2025

Free Report: Catchpoint vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Find out what your peers are saying about Catchpoint vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,077 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Catchpoint vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.