No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CARTO vs Precisely Locate comparison

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CARTO
Ranking in Location Intelligence Platforms
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Precisely Locate
Ranking in Location Intelligence Platforms
3rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Location Intelligence Platforms category, the mindshare of CARTO is 6.9%, down from 23.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Precisely Locate is 5.8%, down from 13.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Location Intelligence Platforms Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CARTO6.9%
Precisely Locate5.8%
Other87.3%
Location Intelligence Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

LB
RCES, RCIS at a government with 10,001+ employees
Advanced mapping has improved complex ablations and currently reduces repeat arrhythmia procedures
The shape of the catheter currently being used, the FARAPULSE, is lasso-shaped and represents the first generation. The second generation is about to be implemented, and I believe it will be a major change. However, the shape of the current catheter is not really useful for isolating the veins. The ICE catheters are very good, and the mapping system is really excellent. Other companies currently have a better catheter shape, even though they lack many things that CARTO has. That catheter shape makes a difference in the duration of the procedure.
Use Precisely Locate?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Location Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
16%
Retailer
16%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
14%
Construction Company
6%
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CARTO?
There was a trial period for fourteen days. Once our fourteen days ended, it became very expensive and we lost our workflows in the process because working on any project takes more than fourteen d...
What needs improvement with CARTO?
If I consider how CARTO can be improved, the AI agent can become better eventually because we are in a changing landscape. CARTO could expand their LLM support; right now, it operates more on Claud...
What is your primary use case for CARTO?
During my live project, I used CARTO as an interface to access GeoJSON files and other geospatial data while analyzing very different aspects, including population, satellite imagery, and identifyi...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Builder
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Wecity
Information Not Available