• Home
  • CARTO vs. Geoblink

CARTO vs Geoblink comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CARTO Logo
CARTO
151 views|114 comparisons
Geoblink Logo
Geoblink
62 views|14 comparisons
Ranking
2nd
out of 10 in Location Intelligence Platforms
Views
151
Comparisons
114
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
4th
out of 10 in Location Intelligence Platforms
Views
62
Comparisons
14
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Builder
Learn More
CARTO
Geoblink
Video Not Available
Overview

CARTO Builder is a web-based drag and drop analysis tool for analysts and business users to discover and predict key insights from location data. Unleash the power of location intelligence with self-service, actionable applications you can share across your organization. Working with CARTO is intuitive, logical, and effortless.

Geoblink is a SaaS-based Location Management Platform that helps companies in the Retail Ecosystem (including Retail, Consumer Goods and Commercial Real Estate) make informed business decisions that concern location.

Sample Customers
Wecity
DANONE, KFC, PUREGYM, PIZZA HUT, IKEA, RED BULL
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company15%
Retailer12%
Real Estate/Law Firm9%
Manufacturing Company8%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise56%
No Data Available

CARTO is ranked 2nd in Location Intelligence Platforms while Geoblink is ranked 4th in Location Intelligence Platforms. CARTO is rated 0.0, while Geoblink is rated 0.0. On the other hand, CARTO is most compared with Placer.ai, Tableau and Microsoft Power BI, whereas Geoblink is most compared with .

See our list of best Location Intelligence Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Location Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.