Camunda vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect comparison

Camunda and Sparx Systems are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Camunda is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4, while Sparx Systems is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.2. Camunda holds a 11.3% mindshare in BPD, compared to Sparx Systems’s 9.1% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Sparx Systems users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 78 Camunda reviews

21,608 Views
6,050 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Sparx Systems Enterprise Ar...

Read 99 Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect reviews

8,412 Views
5,384 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Camunda

Sparx Systems Enterprise Ar...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Camunda compete in the modeling and business process management categories. Enterprise Architect has the upper hand in architecture modeling due to its comprehensive UML support, while Camunda excels in business process management through its BPMN capabilities and flexibility.

Features: Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect delivers extensive support for modeling standards such as UML, ArchiMate, and BPMN, enabling various architectural practices. It offers sequence, class, and use case modeling, along with automated documentation generation. Camunda focuses on business process management with robust modeling of BPMN, CMMN, and DMN standards, providing flexibility and scalability with its open-source platform.

Room for Improvement: Enterprise Architect could benefit from a more intuitive interface, improved integration and collaboration features, and modernized project management tools. Camunda could enhance its user experience by improving interfaces and extending integration with non-Java platforms. Better process visualization and user form creation are also areas for enhancement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect offers flexibility across on-premises and hybrid environments, supported by detailed documentation and community resources, though its email-only support is noted as a limitation. Camunda is praised for its open-source community and flexibility, benefiting from extensive troubleshooting resources.

Pricing and ROI: Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is affordable, with competitive pricing and diverse licensing options that align with various organization sizes, enhancing ROI with productivity improvements. Camunda offers cost-effective solutions with its open-source version, appealing to enterprises for BPM capabilities at a lower cost, although the enterprise edition can become expensive depending on process instances managed.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,655 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Design

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (1st), Process Automation (1st)

Sparx Systems Enterprise Ar...

Ranking in Business Process Design

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of Camunda is 11.3%, up from 11.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is 9.1%, down from 12.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Camunda	11.3%
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect	9.1%
Other	79.6%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

CristianoGomes

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Supports long-running asynchronous processes effectively but has not evolved much in recent years

I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself. I did not see any innovations on that aspect, especially for the open-source version. I was making some tests recently and the tool seemed pretty much the same as it was three or four years ago. Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version. To be honest, it did not change much from the Activiti initial version. Activiti was pretty much what Camunda is today. They invested a lot on Zeebe and made it the engine for their SaaS cloud version. Camunda itself, the embedded engine, did not evolve too much. They could invest more on that.

Read full review

Milan Sterba

Senior Enterprise Architect at Deepview S.r.o.

Efficient documentation generation through organized model structure with a good price-performance ratio

Whenever I begin a new project with Sparx, I have to spend time training people on how to use it since it is not straightforward. Although it's a powerful product with plenty of features, it's not easy for even experienced users to find their way without guidance. This is not the most user-friendly solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"EC2 makes scaling horizontally incredibly easy, especially when working under the ECS service."

"The most valuable feature is that, with a visual system, you can try to have a process client before beginning the programming for the application."

"The platform's approach to BPMN modeling is straightforward and versatile, making it easy to adopt and use effectively."

"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."

"It is an absolutely stable solution."

"The flexibility is great."

"The biggest difference between Camunda and Bonita might be that Camunda is simpler and more flexible for setting, though we are at the beginning and need to experiment."

"The solution is useful for small projects."

More Camunda pros

"Scalable solution for modeling, project sharing, and collaboration. Support for it is good."

"Simplified our task at maintaining architecture information and traceability with requirements."

"It's like a repository. So far, we use it only for Information Modelling."

"It's easy to search within the solution."

"It's a stable and scalable solution. I like that it's similar to Rational Rose."

"It is a very flexible product. It can do a lot. It is also a reliable product."

"We use it to develop and maintain the Enterprise Conceptual Model, migrated from erwin a couple of years ago."

"Artifact templates are most valuable."

More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect pros

Cons

"There should be a multi-tenant solution for the platform where it supports multiple organizations on one platform instead of having to spin up multiple clusters for each organization. There should be an easy way to integrate different departments into one platform without having to operate multiple platforms. The operations should be easier with the enterprise solution. It should not create more overhead for the operations people."

"We have faced problems with the performance."

"We're trying to put the people from the business to do it. We are using APIs, and we have open APIs to define our APIs and the request-response that each call requires and sends. So, to base the mapping on that, there was nothing to help. I know that with some tools, such as Oracle tools, you can see the input and expected output. With drag and drop, you can take one property from the left and drag it to the right, and it does all the mapping itself, but that's not the case with Camunda. So, for me, this is something that can be improved."

"The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw."

"They could provide more documentation regarding the integration of different programming languages."

"The latency of API could be decreased."

"Camunda needs to improve its user interface for low-code development and provide more user interface options beyond the basic workflow."

"If they could build some scripts or some configuration to get it up and running in a Docker environment, that would be good. I didn't find anything when on Docker, however, maybe they have something and I didn't see it yet."

More Camunda cons

"The documentation needs a bit of improvement. What I find is that when I'm trying to do something specific for some part of a project, in terms of documentation, it's kind of hard to get at figuring out if you don't use it all the time."

"The presentation graphics need to be improved in future builds."

"What should be improved are the integration capabilities of the solution with Bizagi."

"It would be great if we could decrease the use of different parts of the Toolbox."

"From a practical point of view, we need speed and reliability for creating a model and doing some really meaningful tasks such as application landscape, refactoring, etc. These are two primary criteria. Sometimes, when you import something, it creates the object duplicates, or it allows you to do something that you're not supposed to do. For example, validation is missing. This could be frustrating because when you work at a high speed, you need to come back and start fixing things that the tool allowed you to go with, which is not quite good. So, there should probably be some internal mechanisms to advise you about what you're doing and what is probably not the best idea."

"The UI is a little bit outdated. It should be more fresh and clean."

"The solution needs to offer better support for the mobile-based system. Right now, it's not working."

"There used to be that feature in ArchiMate Modeling of Enterprise Architect called inherited relationships. Now it's gone."

More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"Compared to other software, Camunda Platform is quite cost-effective."

"We are using the paid edition because there is no separate support and service license yet. We are yet to find a suitable licensing model for Camunda because we only use the engine, and we have implemented our solution around Camunda Cloud. So, we are mainly interested in the support and service, and that's what we mainly use in the paid edition."

"We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."

"We are using the community version. There is no licensing cost."

"We have an annual subscription to this solution."

"There is a bit of scope for improvement in how the licensing and pricing are done. They are based on the number of processing instances you execute on the cluster... but on the self-hosted mode, the pricing model should be customized."

"We use a community version."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

"They have the price on their site for the enterprise version, and we do receive a small discount."

"Licenses are pretty low cost compared to, for example, ARIS."

"Pricing and licensing are suitable even for small companies."

"We paid 1200 euros as a once-off cost. All add ons and integrations come at an additional cost."

"We have an annual license, and it's very affordable."

"The solution is quite expensive."

"I use my own license. So, I just bought the professional version, which costs $800 or something like that. In the company where I am working, we have floating licenses. They are probably more expensive. Its licensing is affordable, but we are talking about a large organization, and there could be modelers or viewers of the models. We don't know how much that would cost us."

"There is no license required for this solution."

More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,655 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	29

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	38
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	58

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

What do you like most about Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect?

The stability has been good and satisfactory. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect?

One of the reasons many public sector institutions in the Czech Republic use it is that it provides a very good price-performance ratio. While it might be cumbersome to learn, it still delivers exc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect?

See all answers

Comparisons

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Visual Paradigm vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Compared 14% of the time

No Magic MagicDraw vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Compared 9% of the time

Visio vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Compared 8% of the time

LeanIX vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Compared 8% of the time

erwin Data Modeler vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Compared 3% of the time

More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

October 2025

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

October 2025

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect report

Download Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

No data available

Interactive Demo

Camunda

Demo not available

Sparx Systems

Overview

Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.

Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.

What are Camunda's key features?

Lightweight Architecture: Offers streamlined and efficient process management.
Scalability: Supports growth and complexity in operations.
Flexibility with BPMN, CMMN, and DMN Standards: Ensures adaptability to different process modeling needs.
Open-Source: Encourages customization and user-specific enhancements.
Graphical Process Modeling: Intuitive interface for designing and automating processes.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes for optimized performance.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth workflow across different systems.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates effective cooperation between business and IT.
Customizability: Adapts to specific user requirements and system environments.

In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.

Camunda

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is an enterprise solution that helps streamline, accelerate, and integrate software, system, and business development. With this intuitive modeling and design solution, enterprises can stay in control of their workplaces, enable collaboration, support their teams and colleagues, and manage complex projects. Software architects, business analysts, project managers, developers, support staff, and testers can unite under a single repository. Through numerous view points and potential sub-systems, users are offered a unified view in a complex environment.

With Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, users are also offered a shared model option which can be accessed quickly and securely by in-office and remote team members through the Enterprise Architect’s Pro Cloud Server. Building a coherent, verifiable model can be done by connecting and integrating a variety of behavioral and structural information in visual form. As a result, Enterprise Architect offers high performance, flexibility, and the ability to model, manage, and trace every stage of the business development and modeling process.

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Features

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect assists in creating a unified and accessible vision in business development by offering a flexible platform with a unique set of rich features. These features include:

Test and debug - Streamline software development and visualize software with the simulation process. Users can test and confirm correct behavior, set and oversee test points, and debug and examine software.

Track tasks - Track, prioritize, and assign individual and group tasks to assist in the model’s development. Users can visually monitor their progress through the Gantt chart.

Open standards - Users can visualize and analyze running software with integrated custom tools. They can also run advanced simulations, team-based repositories, testing tools, and version control. In addition, the solution supports enterprise architecture frameworks such as UPDM and TOGAF.

Simulation - Create and debug embedded solutions by simulating behaviors and state models. Users can specify events, triggers, constraints, and more. Users can also specify extensive and complex structural systems and create custom domain-specific solutions.

Reviews from Real Users

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect merges high-end tools, online availability, a dedication to open standards, and accessible pricing so enterprises can stay in control of their workplaces, whether remote or in-office. Users particularly like the architectural frameworks and the scalability.

Marc L., a principal architecture enterprise solution adviser at Cronomagic Canada, notes, "The product offers very good support for all mainstream modeling notations and architectural frameworks."

An enterprise architect at a manufacturing company writes, "Scalable solution for modeling, project sharing, and collaboration. Support for it is good."

Sparx Systems

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

OmniLink

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

September 2025

Free Report: Camunda vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,655 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.