No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Camunda vs Cerbrec Intelligent Operations Platform and AI Agents comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Automation Anywhere
Sponsored
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
662
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (2nd), Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (2nd), Process Mining (1st), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (1st), Agentic Automation (1st), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (2nd), AI Legal & Compliance (1st), AI Finance & Accounting (1st), AI Procurement & Supply Chain (1st)
Camunda
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
78
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (3rd), Business Process Management (BPM) (1st), Process Automation (1st), AI Orchestration Frameworks (3rd), Agentic Automation (8th), AI Agent Builders (9th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (8th)
Cerbrec Intelligent Operati...
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
AI Agent Builders (12th)
 

Featured Reviews

Venkat Sivaprakash - PeerSpot reviewer
Management Consultant at Accenture
Has significantly improved document-driven workflows and reduced processing time across finance and HR functions
Automation Anywhere has evolved significantly and upgraded itself to provide agentic AI and AI-based automation solutions for document automation. The product has matured considerably over time. We can create workflows that can call an API. We can include prompts in particular workflows for ChatGPT-related functions, connecting to an LLM and RAG to perform tasks. For document automation, modern features are available to train documents, ensuring high accuracy and repeatability over time. The system is very easy to use. I recently completed a course in document automation, typically designed for people involved in coding and technical aspects. Though I understand coding comprehensively, I don't do actual coding. The course was very accessible. Currently, extensive coding isn't necessary due to the hybrid model incorporating GenAI aspects, low-code, no-code capabilities, APIs, and numerous pre-built objects in Automation Anywhere. The features include GenAI-driven prompting methods and workflow creation capabilities. In these workflows, we can create decision boxes and call APIs without coding. We simply pull objects, drop them, connect them, and add minimal coding when needed. The most crucial aspect isn't coding but rather sizing the automation and fleshing out the details. Automation Co-pilot takes notes and performs automated analysis. It can extract details from videos, summarize conversations, and provide detailed information. During calls, it identifies instructions and performs tasks such as preparing reports and reconciliation. Automation Anywhere can also connect with Microsoft Co-pilot. Through Co-pilot, real-time operations can be executed, allowing direct interaction between vendors and automation through this component.
CristianoGomes - PeerSpot reviewer
Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Supports long-running asynchronous processes effectively but has not evolved much in recent years
I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself. I did not see any innovations on that aspect, especially for the open-source version. I was making some tests recently and the tool seemed pretty much the same as it was three or four years ago. Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version. To be honest, it did not change much from the Activiti initial version. Activiti was pretty much what Camunda is today. They invested a lot on Zeebe and made it the engine for their SaaS cloud version. Camunda itself, the embedded engine, did not evolve too much. They could invest more on that.
reviewer2801832 - PeerSpot reviewer
SVP of Technology
Automation has unified workflows and now drives AI-orchestrated operations for our teams
We are a sports tech company building the new standard in athlete visibility, and we rely heavily on Cerbrec's AI expertise and AI agent development to help make what we do possible. Our primary use case is automating operational workflows without heavy custom coding Cerbrec has significantly…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"If we count the integrations that we have done with Appian, which is where a lot of our savings is from, we are well over a million dollars in savings."
"It is highly accurate and gets up and running in a very short period of time."
"Compared to other tools like NICE and Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere is the only tool that gets your work completed in half the time."
"What I appreciate the most about Automation Anywhere is that the tool is very robust."
"Our return on investment is high."
"We have seen more efficient processing and less number of errors due to quality control."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use. It's very user-friendly."
"With IQ Bot, we can now include cognitive automation into our process. The cognitive document processing is pretty good with IQ Bot."
"The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us."
"Its flexibility stands out as the most valuable feature."
"Camunda is the best among similar solutions like JBPM and Activiti."
"We have the ability to modify the product if we need to, and that comes in handy whenever we need to add new functionality and features."
"The product has a good task management engine."
"The most valuable feature of Camunda Platform is its Microservices architecture, which is easily integrable with APIs."
"The product is stable."
"Before Camunda, we had a lot of people interacting with the invoice daily, and with Camunda, those people are now handling only more complex checks and validations, and our processing time for an invoice is reduced from about 30 days to 10 days with about 70% saving of time."
"Cerbrec’s ability to rapidly prototype solutions, test them, and make changes has allowed them to leapfrog similar solutions in terms of value delivery."
"Cerbrec has significantly improved our operational efficiency by unifying disparate workflows into a single AI-orchestrated system."
 

Cons

"Sometimes, I find that Excel automation is not as expected. Excel automation can be enhanced."
"Excel functionalities, the macro interface can be improved in the next release of RPA platform Automation Anywhere."
"The biggest issue was that the new license required upgraded hardware infrastructure so we were getting all new tech stuff procured which meant that we were getting updated RAMs and things like that. Getting the licenses was easier but building the infrastructure which was required to support the new version was difficult."
"Automation Anywhere's stability could improve. It isn't completely stable, but it's getting better daily."
"Verbose logging of bot compiling and deployment from the control room. Events occurring during compiling, pre-processing the bots should be logged in the control room or bot launcher logs."
"With Oracle and ServiceNow, there seem to be challenges. With SAP, it worked very well."
"They need to make the solution more robust."
"Migration is a little challenging since it requires direct integration with DB, credential vault and all that."
"In the latest version, there are certain workflow nodes that are missing. Camunda should bring those back, or rather, develop them quickly."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"The primary issue regarding the Camuto platform is its high cost of training. This is why I haven't discussed it extensively, as compared to other products that are more affordable in terms of developer training."
"I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution."
"Support is an area that is in need of improvement."
"Like all BPM tools, they're very bad with proprietary UIs. In general, anyone who uses BPM tools should not expect to use their proprietary UI."
"The solution's pricing and scalability could be improved."
"It lacks some preset features and configurations which would make it more plug-and-play for customers."
"Documentation for advanced agent customization is good, but it could include more real-world examples."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It depends. For example, for my group, we are centralizing the infrastructure in Paris. Our contract is signed with Automation Anywhere in France. The currency and the pricing of Automation Anywhere in France can appear beneficial and interesting for Germany and Scandinavian countries, but when we share our infra and are internally charging other countries such as Poland, Brazil, or some other country with a lower currency value as compared to Euro, it becomes less beneficial. They would prefer to sign the contract directly with Automation Anywhere because they will benefit from a price that is as per their local market."
"The cost is affordable, which makes an easy barrier to entry for the RPA market."
"We brought onshore a lot of what we were doing offshore, saving our company close to $20 million."
"I would like them to have better license management."
"This is a comprehensive automation offering with a scalable architecture and flexible pricing models."
"It is not cheap, but we are able to get an ROI."
"I am not sure about the costs, but two Bot Runners and four Bot Creators may cost approximately 1CR."
"The licensing cost could be improved. It costs a lot. At the very least, the developer licenses and the control panels should be made free to enterprises, and the production environment licensed."
"The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."
"There were some features that were only available in the paid version."
"Compared to other software, Camunda Platform is quite cost-effective."
"The evaluation of my customers on pricing is that it is reasonable."
"We pay for the license of this solution annually."
"We have an annual subscription to this solution."
"Camunda is much cheaper."
"The product is expensive for a small or medium-sized company."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Agent Builders solutions are best for your needs.
909,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Construction Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business157
Midsize Enterprise81
Large Enterprise558
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business43
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise30
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?
It depends on your use case. Is it simply to automate a couple of processes? Is it to augment a human team? AA is ver...
How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?
From my experience using AA tool, it depends on the applications that you want to automate, because there some applic...
How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?
It is a highly preferred RPA tool. You can check my Automation Anywhere Review to know more.
How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?
One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With B...
Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?
Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with...
Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?
Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cerbrec Intelligent Operations Platform and AI Agents?
Pricing is competitive, especially with the claimed cost savings over fully custom development. Pricing was flexible ...
What needs improvement with Cerbrec Intelligent Operations Platform and AI Agents?
Documentation for advanced agent customization is good, but it could include more real-world examples. I know they ar...
What is your primary use case for Cerbrec Intelligent Operations Platform and AI Agents?
We are a sports tech company building the new standard in athlete visibility, and we rely heavily on Cerbrec's AI exp...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

Automation Anywhere, Testing Anywhere, Automation Anywhere Enterprise, Agentic Process Automation System (Now Certified for WorkSpaces)
Camunda BPM
No data available
 

Interactive Demo

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Google, Linkedin, Cisco, Juniper Networks, DellEMC, Comcast, Mastercard, Quest Diagnostics
24 Hour Fitness, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, Autodesk, Barclays, BNP Paribas, CapitalOne, Commerzbank AG, Deutsche Telekom, Fujitsu, Gainsight, Generali, Goldman Sachs, Provinzial, NatWest Group, Panasonic, R-Kom, Swisscom AG, VHV Group, Warner Music, WellPoint, Zalando
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. Cerbrec Intelligent Operations Platform and AI Agents and other solutions. Updated: July 2026.
909,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.