CA Unified Communications Monitor vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG comparison

Broadcom and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #88, while NETSCOUT is ranked #77. Broadcom holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

799 Views
575 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Read 13 NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG reviews

957 Views
938 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG compete in network performance monitoring and analysis. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG appears to have an upper hand with advanced features, whereas CA Unified Communications Monitor is preferred for cost-effectiveness and strong support.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor offers streamlined diagnostics, essential monitoring capabilities, and lower complexity. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG provides extensive data capture, enriched insights, and comprehensive network visibility.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could benefit from improved integration capabilities, enhanced analytics tools, and additional customization options. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG may enhance by simplifying deployment complexity, reducing resource demands, and lowering initial costs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Unified Communications Monitor is known for straightforward deployment and effective guidance, making it suitable for organizations with limited IT resources. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG offers a powerful deployment model with extensive service options, which can support users during the implementation process.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor is generally more affordable, providing a good return on investment for essential monitoring needs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG has a higher setup cost, but its comprehensive features deliver substantial value in complex network environments.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

88th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (3rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (69th)

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

77th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG	0.5%
CA Unified Communications Monitor	0.5%
Other	99.0%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

Michael Gideon Genita

Associate System Engineer at SMS Global Technologies, Inc.

Easy to set up with good documentation and helpful support

I'm using it for a customer The packet flow switch is the most valuable aspect of the solution. It's an easy product to set up. We can scale the solution if we need to. It's stable. The documentation is well-written and quite useful. It's compatible with other products. Under the pocket flow…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"It has cut our troubleshooting down by days. Once we have a product in place, we show people examples of how it can streamline their troubleshooting process."

"It helps us get to root cause quickly. With utilization and consumption of bandwidth, we can usually see what application is taking as much as they should (or shouldn't), then account for it accordingly."

"It helps us to assist our customers to isolate problems. If it is us who is having the problem, then we can use it to streamline the process."

"I love the single pane of glass view. It makes it easier to not have to navigate everywhere. It allows more simplistic visibility, without having to go from tool to tool to tool, or from window to window to window."

"The tool has the ability to look back within a month's data. It is very easy to navigate within the tool and troubleshoot the problem, compared to other solutions that we've used in the past."

"The technical support is really good. They will go above and beyond, if you are running into a problem. You can go to a sales engineer, who will engage technical support to help you out."

"We use it for monitoring whenever we update a new circuit or site."

"It allows us to get quicker resolutions. We can see exactly what is using up the bandwidth, so we can assist end users."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG pros

Cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"The NetFlow Collectors could handle more flows per minute."

"The technology goes end-of-life on us every year, which is why I am looking forward to vSTREAM. I don't like when devices go end-of-life on us so quickly. If we can get more of an advanced notice of when an end-of-life is brought up, because our certification process within the organization takes a while."

"The stability depends on who is using the tool, because you only can get as much out of the tool as you put into it. There are a lot of patches for this particular environment, so you have to keep on them. If you lose track of them, then the product is not useful anymore."

"We don't use the single pane of glass view, even though we own it."

"The scalability has some limitations and quirks to it. I would like to be able to upgrade rather than replace the whole thing."

"It's not able to communicate with our probes."

"The monitoring and reporting tool needs improvement. Users want more information, such as the level of detail when doing a packet analysis. They want more detail to be able to isolate down to a specific point."

"I'd like them to make the product more user-friendly."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The scalability is good, but it comes at a cost. E.g., if you need 100 InfiniStream because you are sending gigs or terabytes of data to one InfiniStream, then you will have to purchase another InfiniStream, which are not cheap."

"The price is a little high."

"To capture more with the solution that we bought, you have to buy another InfiniStreamNG, and there are only four ports in the back."

"This product could be cheaper."

"It can be scalable. It just costs too much. With a company as big as ours, it gets too expensive to accommodate every single site."

"I would like it to be more scalable with less spend."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

Comparisons

Icinga vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 17% of the time

StackState vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 12% of the time

ITRS Geneos vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

LogicMonitor vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

Zabbix vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Competitors

Riverbed NPM+ vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 19% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 15% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 14% of the time

Flowmon vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 13% of the time

cPacket cClear vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 11% of the time

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

December 2025

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

January 2026

Download NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

InfiniStreamNG, NETSCOUT ISNG, Infinistream

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

NETSCOUT’s new ISNG platform harnesses the power of IP intelligence by mining traffic in real-time to deliver accurate and actionable data for service assurance, cybersecurity and business intelligence applications. The InfiniStreamNG platform fully supports the nGeniusONE and Iris application suites.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

U.S. Department of Defense

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

December 2025

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.