Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations comparison

Broadcom and ExtraHop Networks are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #103, while ExtraHop Networks is ranked #73. Broadcom holds a 0.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to ExtraHop Networks’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ExtraHop Networks users who would recommend it.
CA Unified Communications M...
Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews
  • 348 Views
  • 230 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...
Read 8 ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations reviews
  • 1,230 Views
  • 898 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and ExtraHop Reveal(x) compete in the IT operations space. ExtraHop Reveal(x) seems to have the upper hand with its advanced features, despite its higher pricing.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor offers robust call quality monitoring, comprehensive reporting, and unified communications management. ExtraHop Reveal(x) provides real-time data analysis, security threat detection, and network performance insights.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could enhance its advanced data analytics, threat detection capabilities, and integration options with third-party tools. ExtraHop Reveal(x) may benefit from simplifying its deployment process, offering more cost-effective pricing models, and improving initial user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Unified Communications Monitor is noted for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, facilitating easy integration into existing systems. ExtraHop Reveal(x), with a more comprehensive model, requires more effort during setup, but it provides commendable support services for thorough guidance.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor has a lower setup cost, offering quicker ROI for budget-conscious buyers. ExtraHop Reveal(x) involves higher initial investment but presents a compelling ROI due to its enriched features, justifying the cost for enhanced IT operation solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 862,452 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
103rd
Average Rating
6.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Unified Communications Monitoring (6th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (68th)
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
73rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Network Diagnostics (13th), IT Operations Analytics (14th), Network Packet Capture (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981 - PeerSpot reviewer
Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features
The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.
Read full review
Out West - PeerSpot reviewer
Great for identifying application interdependencies with helpful support but needs better visualizations
We're just trying to identify the application interdependencies, which normally reside on different servers, including web servers, database servers, enterprise service bus, et cetera, up to your presentation layer before we start moving stuff around. Normally, the reason why we use these tools is to understand what assets we have, where they're deployed, and how they enter and operate before we decide to go move something from point A to point B. The solution is going to allow me to establish a wave or migration plan where you have different waves of migration and then you actually have move groups to try and get your application moved from A to B seamlessly. A to B could be on-premise to on-premise. It could be on-premise to cloud. Et cetera. The solution can tell me what components can I deploy, for example, into a cloud space, without having to refactor my applications since that can be quite time-consuming and costly.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Good end-to-end monitoring"
"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."
"The most valuable features are security detections, perimeter detection, dashboards, and alerts."
"Not only can you look at the protocol import level. It also has a live PCAP analysis."
"Wire data analytics."
"The most valuable feature is the way it handles data, from Layer 2 up to Layer 7. We can see everything that happens in the network."
"This solution is more applications reference architecture focused. Its benefit is that it specializes in that space."
"There are many valuable features in this product, but probably the biggest is the customization capability it has."
 

Cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."
"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."
"They have a new solution, ExtraHop Reveal(x), and I think it needs improvement."
"This solution would be improved if it had the ability to retain data longer."
"They either have to go broad or decide what their bread and butter is and get really good at that."
"I would improve the Rule-Based Access Control (RBAC) by providing granular access control to the data."
"We'd like to see a local presence within the region in order to have seamless service whether it's the support, the implementation, or professional services."
"Network visibility is something that needs to be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing is fair considering the value provided."
"The pricing is higher than other solutions, but with such good features, I think it's worth it."
"The price of this solution for our environment is about £650,000 ($855,000 USD) for three years."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
862,452 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
19%
Educational Organization
19%
Computer Software Company
12%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Comparisons

No data available
ThousandEyes vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
ThousandEyes vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 18% of the time
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 16% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 15% of the time
Devo vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
Devo vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 12% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Compared 11% of the time
More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic
July 2025
CA Unified Communications Monitor reportDownload CA Unified Communications Monitor product report
Buyer's Guide
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
July 2025
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations reportDownload ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations product report
 

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor
No data available
 

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

The ExtraHop Application Performance Management Solution Delivers Unified Visibility Across the IT Environment w/ Proactive Alerts & Accelerated Troubleshooting

ExtraHop Networks
 

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass
Alaska Airlines, bet365, Concur, McKesson, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Practice Fusion, Seattle Children's Hospital, Steward Health Care System
Buyer's Guide
CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
July 2025
Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
862,452 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.