We performed a comparison between CA NetMaster File Transfer Management and WS_FTP Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Control-M simplifies application and data workflow orchestration on premises or as a service. It makes it easy to build, define, schedule, manage, and monitor production workflows, ensuring visibility, reliability, and improving SLAs.
CA NetMaster File Transfer Management enables you to be aware of the status of critical file transfers and allows for actions based on defined data center policies. If you do any kind of file transport, CA NetMaster can provide you with enhanced visibility of your scheduled and unscheduled file transfers.
WS_FTP Server is a proven, effective, easy-to-use file transfer solution. Secure data in transit while integrating programmable methodologies that simplify file transfer tasks and improve efficiency. Improve control, visibility and security over file transfer activities by implementing safeguards against information leaks and data breaches.
CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is ranked 40th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while WS_FTP Server is ranked 26th in Managed File Transfer (MFT). CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is rated 0.0, while WS_FTP Server is rated 0.0. On the other hand, CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is most compared with , whereas WS_FTP Server is most compared with MOVEit, IBM Sterling File Gateway and CompleteFTP.
See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.
We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.