Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CA NetMaster File Transfer Management vs SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server comparison

Broadcom and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. Broadcom is ranked #40, while SolarWinds is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.0. Broadcom holds a 0.0% mindshare in MFT, compared to SolarWinds’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SolarWinds users are willing to recommend the solution.
CA NetMaster File Transfer ...
  • 50 Views
  • 14 Comparison Views
SolarWinds Serv-U File Tran...
Read 1 SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server review
  • 242 Views
  • 149 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between CA NetMaster File Transfer Management and SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Fortra, BMC and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,632 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CA NetMaster File Transfer ...
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
40th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SolarWinds Serv-U File Tran...
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
19th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is 0.0%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server is 0.6%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
 

Featured Reviews

Use CA NetMaster File Transfer Management?
Share your opinion
reviewer2292672 - PeerSpot reviewer
The solution can be used for internal file transfer, but its technical support and third-party integrations should be improved
I am comparing SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server, WS_FTP, and Wing FTP for my current company. We use the solution for multiple purposes, and it should be user-friendly when integrating something. We cannot always depend on the support team to come and fix the issues. Overall, I rate SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server a seven out of ten.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Healthcare Company
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server?
We use SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server for internal file transfer.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server?
The pricing of the solution is INR 3,00,000. The pricing of the solution should come down.
See all answers
What needs improvement with SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server?
The solution’s technical support should be improved. The solution's initial setup and third-party integrations could be improved.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
GoAnywhere MFT vs SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server Logo
GoAnywhere MFT vs SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server
Compared 52% of the time
MOVEit vs SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server Logo
MOVEit vs SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server
Compared 48% of the time
More SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
June 2025
CA NetMaster File Transfer Management reportDownload CA NetMaster File Transfer Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
June 2025
SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server reportDownload SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server, Serv-U FTP Server
 

Overview

CA NetMaster File Transfer Management enables you to be aware of the status of critical file transfers and allows for actions based on defined data center policies. If you do any kind of file transport, CA NetMaster can provide you with enhanced visibility of your scheduled and unscheduled file transfers.

Broadcom

Serv-U Managed File Transfer (MFT) - Remote File Sharing | SolarWinds SolarWinds logo Government Customer... logo Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server Enhance security and control over... “Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server is a versatile, easy-to-deploy solution that integrates well into... Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server is an excellent and cost-effective solution.

SolarWinds
 

Sample Customers

Hill International, SAIF, Travelport, Sky
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
June 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Fortra, BMC and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.