CA App Synthetic Monitor vs ManageEngine Applications Manager comparison

Broadcom and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Broadcom is ranked #68, while ManageEngine is ranked #40 with an average rating of 7.3. Broadcom holds a 0.5% mindshare in APM, compared to ManageEngine’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Read 3 CA App Synthetic Monitor reviews

1,127 Views
1,104 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

ManageEngine Applications M...

Read 18 ManageEngine Applications Manager reviews

3,129 Views
2,315 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

CA App Synthetic Monitor

ManageEngine Applications M...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

ManageEngine Applications Manager and CA App Synthetic Monitor are popular tools for application performance management, each with its strengths. Users note that CA App Synthetic Monitor generally excels in feature set and reliability, while ManageEngine Applications Manager offers better value in pricing and customer support.

Features: Users highlight the comprehensive monitoring capabilities and ease of use in ManageEngine Applications Manager. CA App Synthetic Monitor is appreciated for its robust synthetic monitoring and advanced alerting features. However, CA App Synthetic Monitor stands out with a more extensive feature set, tailored for larger enterprises.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine Applications Manager users suggest improvements in scalability and better integration with other tools. CA App Synthetic Monitor users seek more intuitive setup processes and enhanced reporting capabilities. Thus, CA App Synthetic Monitor has room for enhancement in usability, whereas ManageEngine Applications Manager can improve in scalability and integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine Applications Manager is praised for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. In contrast, CA App Synthetic Monitor, while effective post-deployment, is reported to have a more complex initial setup. ManageEngine Applications Manager provides a smoother deployment experience and superior customer support compared to CA App Synthetic Monitor.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine Applications Manager is frequently cited for its cost-effectiveness and strong return on investment. Users feel that CA App Synthetic Monitor, though more expensive, offers extensive features making it worth the price for larger organizations. Thus, ManageEngine Applications Manager is preferred for budget-conscious buyers, while CA App Synthetic Monitor appeals to those seeking feature-rich solutions despite the higher cost.

To learn more, read our detailed CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

68th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ManageEngine Applications M...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

40th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (34th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of CA App Synthetic Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine Applications Manager is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ManageEngine Applications Manager	0.9%
CA App Synthetic Monitor	0.5%
Other	98.6%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

reviewer2286675

System Administrator at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

A reliable solution for SSL offloading and to encrypt outside traffic

If you are responsible for monitoring the logs in F5, it isn't very easy. The format is complicated compared to different vendors. For example, Fortinet and Cisco have feasible formats for sending and fetching logs. Suppose I'm monitoring the logs and everything, and when I am retrieving logs from F5, I want to know whether it is regular traffic or any abnormality is happening. The logs itself is not user-friendly. It may not give you a clear way of what's happening. You have to go through different websites and work on it. You have to waste so much time on it.

Read full review

Srinivasan Naidu

Senior System Engineer at Qatar Petroleum

Managing application health has become simpler but new monitoring features still need faster delivery

I use application discovery and dependency mapping. It helps with managing application health What I like about ManageEngine Applications Manager is the ease of use and ease of deployment. I cannot remember anything specific for future updates of the product. The new features take a lot of time…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Each had strengths in one area or another, but CA covered the majority of our needs end-to-end."

"From our experience, it really helps managers in measuring application SLAs and viewing historical performance data."

"Applications Manager helps businesses ensure their revenue-critical applications meet end user expectations."

"ITSM is a valuable feature, it complies with the requirements in Pakistan."

"ManageEngine Applications Manager maintains the historical data and it's easy for us to analyze the trends and patterns and fix them accordingly."

"What I like about ManageEngine Applications Manager is the ease of use and ease of deployment."

"ManageEngine Applications Manager maintains the historical data and it's easy for us to analyze the trends and patterns and fix them accordingly."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to be able to monitor Kubernetes."

"If cost is your consideration and you have a well-rounded system administrator, this is a good product to explore."

"I found Application Manager better than other products, including Solarwinds, because there are so manys option in Application Manager that makes it unique, such as supporting all servers, networks, cloud systems etc."

More ManageEngine Applications Manager pros

Cons

"Pricing makes little sense. We had examples where it would be cheaper to have two basic accounts than one intermediate."

"The RBMS component is limited as you can only record using Internet Explorer."

"The information provided by ManageEngine is not deep-dive like IBM and CA provide."

"More modem support for SMS feature."

"They can improve the post-processing of the data. AppDynamics has more powerful tools for post-processing or analytics. It has some limitations in more complex environments, but because we are free to use different solutions, we try to find what is best for the customers or the problem we are trying to solve."

"One area of improvement is the dashboard should be more readable and available."

"I would say that the implementation of ManageEngine Applications Manager is too detailed. You need some training to effectually use it."

"My suggestion for improving this feature is to also monitor the end-user experience for application clients and servers."

"They could probably rearrange the UI so that it would be easy for people who are new to the Application Manager to configure things."

"The main issue with ManageEngine is that it only functions as a record-keeping system, it has never had an IT framework in place."

More ManageEngine Applications Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The licensing costs for ManageEngine Applications Manager are around $1,200 per year. For additional monitors, you have to pay extra."

"Its price is good."

"The cost of this solution is not too bad, although it could be cheaper considering what you're getting for the price."

"It is a cost-effective solution."

"The solution is noted for its cost-effectiveness, a crucial consideration for potential users."

"The annual licensing depends on the number of monitors you have connected. Once you get to two hundred monitors you can see the price reflect."

"ManageEngine Applications Manager has reasonable pricing. It's more affordable than other solutions in the market. My company has an instance-based license for ManageEngine Applications Manager. You can purchase a yearly subscription or a perpetual license. The standard license covers most features, but you can still have some paid add-ons."

"The solution's licensing costs are yearly."

More ManageEngine Applications Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Applications Manager?

I am satisfied with the licensing cost for ManageEngine Applications Manager.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Applications Manager?

The new features take a lot of time to be implemented, and that could be improved about ManageEngine Applications Manager. If I were requesting a new feature that is not existing, making it availab...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine Applications Manager?

I use application discovery and dependency mapping. It helps with managing application health.

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk AppDynamics vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 19% of the time

OpenText SiteScope vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 18% of the time

IDERA Precise vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

Stackify vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

Snyk vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

More CA App Synthetic Monitor Competitors

Azure Monitor vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 10% of the time

Dynatrace vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 6% of the time

SCOM vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More ManageEngine Applications Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2026

Download CA App Synthetic Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine Applications Manager

April 2026

ManageEngine Applications Manager report

Download ManageEngine Applications Manager product report

Also Known As

CA ASM

Applications Manager

Overview

CA App Synthetic Monitor provides proactive monitoring of web applications and services to ensure performance and availability. It allows businesses to identify and resolve problems before they impact users.

By simulating user interactions and analyzing application performance, CA App Synthetic Monitor enables businesses to maintain optimal service levels. This cloud-based solution offers a comprehensive view of application health through real-time monitoring and alerts, facilitating quick identification of performance bottlenecks and outages. It helps IT teams enhance user experience by predicting potential issues and optimizing resource allocation. Its flexibility and scalability cater to a range of business needs.

What are key features of CA App Synthetic Monitor?

Real-Time Monitoring: Continuous monitoring of web applications to detect issues quickly.
Global Reach: Simulate user transactions from multiple locations worldwide.
Custom Alerts: Set up customized alerts for specific performance thresholds.
Detailed Reporting: Access in-depth analysis of application performance metrics.
Scalability: Easily scalable to match growing business demands.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Improved User Experience: By identifying issues early, end-users encounter fewer disruptions.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces downtime-related costs through early detection and resolution.
Enhanced Reliability: Ensures application reliability and reduces service outages.
Time Saving: Automates performance checks to save time for IT teams.

Industries such as e-commerce, finance, and IT services implement CA App Synthetic Monitor to ensure their software systems remain performant under various conditions. For e-commerce, it assures checkout processes run smoothly. Financial sectors use it to guarantee secure and reliable transaction handling. IT services leverage its capabilities to maintain service level agreements, ensuring customer satisfaction in digital interactions.

Broadcom

ManageEngine Applications Manager offers an intuitive dashboard that combines flexibility and affordability for comprehensive IT monitoring. Supporting over 80 applications and servers, it provides agentless monitoring and seamless integration with other management tools.

ManageEngine Applications Manager stands out with its ability to monitor applications, servers, databases, and IT infrastructures, making it ideal for small to medium businesses seeking a scalable and cost-effective solution. Users benefit from customizable Service Level Management rules, effective Kubernetes monitoring, and frequent software updates. However, there is room for enhancement in agent stability under heavy load conditions, overall scalability, deeper data analysis capabilities, and user experience improvements. Organizations leverage it for application performance monitoring, IT infrastructure management, and service management, incorporating it for application modernization, JVM parameter analysis, and automatic alarm settings. It also facilitates application discovery, dependency mapping, troubleshooting, and cloud service evaluation.

What are the key features of ManageEngine Applications Manager?

Easy-to-Use Dashboard: Offers a user-friendly interface for efficient monitoring.
Comprehensive IT Monitoring: Supports over 80 applications and servers.
Agentless Monitoring: Enables seamless deployment and integration.
Service Level Management: Provides customizable rules to manage services effectively.
Kubernetes Monitoring: Efficiently tracks and manages Kubernetes environments.
Regular Updates: Ensures the software stays up-to-date with new features.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Cost-Effective: Provides a scalable solution suitable for small to medium businesses.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with other management tools.
Customizable Solutions: Offers flexibility to tailor monitoring according to specific business needs.
Comprehensive Documentation: Comes with helpful resources for better understanding.

ManageEngine Applications Manager is implemented across various industries for monitoring SQL databases, service incidents, and IT service management. It supports application discovery and troubleshooting, enhancing management of IT services and asset modules. Companies also use it to evaluate potential cloud service options.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Lexmark

Certis Europe, Financial Domain, SaaS Office Suite, On Demand TV, Parliament's IT Systems, Sastra Technologies, UniServity

Buyer's Guide

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager

April 2026

Free Report: CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.