IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

C2C ArchiveOne vs ZL Unified Archive comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
C2C Logo
51 views|23 comparisons
ZL Technologies Logo
35 views|18 comparisons
Ranking
14th
out of 22 in File Archiving
Views
51
Comparisons
23
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
16th
out of 22 in File Archiving
Views
35
Comparisons
18
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
ArchiveOne
Learn More
C2C
Video Not Available
ZL Technologies
Video Not Available
Overview
Manage emails and archive important correspondence for long term storage and and control of information
Detailed litigation support for every part of the Electronic Discovery Reference Model in proactive and reactive e-discovery.
Offer
Learn more about C2C ArchiveOne
Learn more about ZL Unified Archive
Sample Customers
Alta Loma School District, Gray Reed and McGraw P.C., Chemung County, City of Manchester, Gallon Takacs Boissoneault & Schaffer, City of Staunton, City of Manassas
Raymond James Morgan Keegan

C2C ArchiveOne is ranked 14th in File Archiving while ZL Unified Archive is ranked 16th in File Archiving. C2C ArchiveOne is rated 0.0, while ZL Unified Archive is rated 0.0. On the other hand, C2C ArchiveOne is most compared with , whereas ZL Unified Archive is most compared with .

See our list of best File Archiving vendors.

We monitor all File Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.