C.H. Robinson TMS vs Freightview comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
C.H. Robinson Logo
129 views|87 comparisons
Freightview Logo
54 views|44 comparisons
Ranking
13th
Views
129
Comparisons
87
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
18th
Views
54
Comparisons
44
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
TMS
Learn More
Overview
TMS (Textile Management System) is based on Microsoft .net the latest technology from Microsoft. TMS is the most complete Dry cleaning/Textile Management Software on the market with functionality and ease of use that is unmatched by any other dry-cleaning product. The system has been used by over 4000 drycleaners all over the world. Provides the ability to trade baskets and single orders of global equities, futures and options, either manually or algorithmically.

Freightview is a freight transportation management system. It's easy to set up and easy to use. Customers love it because it lets them see all of their negotiated rates in one place instead of going to lots of different carriers websites.

Sample Customers
Toshiba, TMC, Armstrong, CSA, Associated Grocers, Metalfrio Solutions, General Cable, Jel Sert, Harvest Time International
Prosoco, Biozyme, Jones Performance, Allan Store Fixtures, National Specialty Alloys, The Music People!, Vericom Global Solutions, Road Rescue

C.H. Robinson TMS is ranked 13th in Transportation Management while Freightview is ranked 18th in Transportation Management. C.H. Robinson TMS is rated 0.0, while Freightview is rated 0.0. On the other hand, C.H. Robinson TMS is most compared with SAP Transportation Management, whereas Freightview is most compared with .

See our list of best Transportation Management vendors.

We monitor all Transportation Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.