Brocade ADX [EOL] vs HAProxy comparison

Read 48 HAProxy reviews

8,206 Views
5,334 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Brocade ADX [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Brocade ADX [EOL] and HAProxy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about F5, HAProxy, NetScaler and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC).

To learn more, read our detailed Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Report (Updated: September 2026).

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Brocade ADX [EOL]

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HAProxy

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (2nd), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (12th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (6th), Bot Management (6th), Service Mesh (3rd)

Featured Reviews

it_user735237

Sr Technology Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Makes local load balancing relatively simple but could use more options for L7 load balancing

L7 load balancing features like URL re-write, persistence, etc. Also some of the global load balancing features like sticky, sticky-sync, etc Organization has a lot of client facing applications and needs to have multiple servers for scalability. With ADX network load balancer, local load…

Read full review

Shrinivas Devarkonda

Head of DevOps at TripFactory

Handles high traffic efficiently and simplifies complex routing with rule-based logic

I think HAProxy is good as it stands now, but I believe there could be improvements. gRPC has recently been implemented, which is great, along with TLS 1.2 and 1.3 support, and HTTP 2.0 is also available. However, I'm unsure about the benchmark of those HTTP 2.0 requests on HAProxy. If there were any other protocol with better performance than HTTP 2.0, or perhaps mTLS and other similar features, including that in HAProxy would be really great. For improvements, I think that during setup and configuration, the steps provided are neat and clear. Anyone can easily install and configure it. There are many kernel tuning parameters also available, which is great. For specific improvement, in terms of logging, I think printing the full object of the request may help, or if there's a way to reference two requests, it would be beneficial to find a complete session history from a logged-in customer, as it would help analyze customer and user analytics.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ADX is better in capacity and its chassis-based product (10K) is much more scalable."

"We don't have a problem with the user interface. it's good."

"Since the deployment is very easy and the open-source functionality saves a huge amount of cost in terms of project deployment."

"We have reduced a lot of servers, replacing them with one or two HAProxy servers which deliver better performance, accuracy, and an almost 100% success rate with requests coming from customers or other sources, and there are no loopholes, disconnects, or gaps in the entire data flow."

"The anti-DDOS PacketShield filtering solution (embedded in the physical appliances) as well as the BGP route injection are great features and heavily used."

"The main difference between HAProxy and other solutions on the market is that it is open source."

"We use it as a load balancer for our application servers."

"I can't speak to all of the HAProxy features because we don't use them all, but load balancing is very good."

"HAProxy Enterprise Edition has been rock solid. We have essentially had no downtime caused by our load balancers in the last 10 months, because they’ve worked so well. Previously, our load balancers caused us multiple hours per year in downtime."

More HAProxy pros

Cons

"Should have more options for L7 load balancing. Also, troubleshooting is a little difficult with this product."

"A significant area for improvement in HAProxy is its tenancy model; managing multiple environments can be challenging, especially with mergers, acquisitions, or domain changes."

"Pricing, monitoring, and reports can be improved."

"The deployment and configuration of HAProxy are not easy if we compare it with other solutions, such as F5."

"We need to handle new connections by dropping, or queuing them while the HAProxy restarts, and because HAProxy does not handle split config files."

"In my previous job we had some stability issues related to configuration and compatibility with other products."

"Dynamic update API. More things should be possible to be configured during runtime."

"The only area that I can see needing improvement is the management interface, since it is pretty much all through the CLI or configuration. A GUI/web interface could be helpful for users who are not as experienced in the Linux shell. However, HAProxy does have another product that we evaluated called ALOHA, which has a web front-end, but we found it did not meet our needs."

"I would like to see better search handling, and a user interface, with a complete functional graphical unit."

More HAProxy cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The licensing fee for the solution is $690 per unit annually."

"We are using HAProxy as an open-source."

"Very good value for the money. One of the simplest licensing schemes in this category of products."

"The product is open source."

"The price is well worth it. HAProxy Enterprise Edition paid for itself within months, simply due to the resiliency it brings. It was a bit more expensive than we were originally interested in paying, but we are thankful we chose to go with HAProxy."

"HAProxy is free in the initial offer. However, pricing can be improved."

"HAProxy is an open-source solution."

"The tool is open-source."

More HAProxy pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Do you recommend HAProxy?

I do recommend HAProxy for more simple applications or for companies with a low budget, since HAProxy is a free, open-source product. HAProxy is also a good choice for someone looking for a stable ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HAProxy?

Since we used the open-source version, we were not concerned about pricing, setup cost, or licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HAProxy?

For the limited use that I have of HAProxy, I don't have any points to improve. I think I need more time with this tool, or perhaps I simply don't have areas that need to get better. I don't have a...

See all answers

Comparisons

NetScaler vs Brocade ADX [EOL]

Compared 29% of the time

LoadBalancer Enterprise vs Brocade ADX [EOL]

Compared 29% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Brocade ADX [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

Radware Alteon vs Brocade ADX [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

More Brocade ADX [EOL] Competitors

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs HAProxy

Compared 9% of the time

NGINX Plus vs HAProxy

Compared 9% of the time

NetScaler vs HAProxy

Compared 8% of the time

Kemp LoadMaster vs HAProxy

Compared 7% of the time

LoadBalancer Enterprise vs HAProxy

Compared 6% of the time

More HAProxy Competitors

Product Reports

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Download Brocade ADX [EOL] product report

Download HAProxy product report

Also Known As

ADX

HAProxy Community Edition, HAProxy Enterprise Edition, HAPEE

Overview

Brocade ADX Series, used by service provider networks and large enterprise data centers, provides a comprehensive application delivery portfolio. All Brocade ADX platforms run the same software and support the same features. In addition, the base model for all Brocade ADX platforms can be upgraded via two software licenses - a Premium feature license and an SSL license. The Brocade ADX family of application delivery switches includes: Brocade ADX 1000 Series, Brocade ADX 4000 Series and Brocade ADX 10000 Series.

HCLSoftware

HAProxy delivers reliability, high performance, and efficient load balancing solutions. Its open-source model ensures cost-effectiveness and scalability, ideal for managing extensive infrastructure demands with minimal latency while offering seamless integration with modern platforms.

HAProxy is renowned for its robust performance in load balancing across TCP and HTTP protocols, featuring multiple algorithms such as round-robin. Users appreciate its customizable configuration and seamless SSL termination, which make it an excellent choice for managing complex infrastructures. The platform's open-source nature supports scalability, reducing costs while providing flexible proxy operations. HAProxy efficiently handles high concurrency, enabling smooth traffic management and ensuring stability within diverse systems.

What key features does HAProxy offer?

Load Balancing: Balances TCP and HTTP traffic using algorithms like round-robin
SSL Termination: Provides secure, seamless SSL termination for user connections
Customizable Configuration: Offers detailed configuration options for tailored setups
Traffic Management: Comprehensive management of large traffic loads
Open-Source: Cost-effective, scalable solution for tech infrastructures

What benefits and ROI aspects should you consider?

Reliability: High performance with minimal latency, enhancing user satisfaction
Scalability: Open-source model ensures growth without considerable cost
Integration: Compatible with Docker, Kubernetes, and cloud services
Stability: Robust architecture supports complex infrastructures smoothly

HAProxy is extensively used in load balancing implementations across various sectors. Companies deploy it for managing high traffic, Layer 4 and Layer 7 applications, and SQL databases. It supports microservices architecture, performs SSL offloading, and manages email services like SMTP. As a reverse proxy, HAProxy delivers high availability for systems like Redis, RabbitMQ, and Apache while integrating with Docker and Kubernetes. Its features enhance web application firewall capabilities and traffic routing, making it suitable for industries demanding reliable and efficient network management.

Sample Customers

Fusebill, Niagra Falls Bridge Commission, Medien System Partner

Booking.com, GitHub, Reddit, StackOverflow, Tumblr, Vimeo, Yelp

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)