No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Payment Security vs Nudetect comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Payment Security
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
15th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nudetect
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
32nd
Average Rating
6.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Broadcom Payment Security is 1.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nudetect is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Broadcom Payment Security1.9%
Nudetect1.2%
Other96.9%
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

JP
Consultant Fraud Risk Management at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
We are using the product for 3D Secure authentication and fraud prevention
For CA Risk Analytics, we would like to have some statistics available, to do some counting on the number of transactions for example. Also, to have the ability not only for 3D Secure, but accross all online channels. Online banking and App. Because then you would have three online channels. You would have the same device data, so you can combine it. So then you would have an online banking platform, an app, and 3D Secure all from one supplier. This supplier would support all of our authentication methods across those three channels. That's our ultimate goal to have one supplier to support all three online channels.
reviewer2379738 - PeerSpot reviewer
Vice President at a newspaper with 201-500 employees
Used to identify frauds, but its accuracy could be improved
It is highly unlikely that I will recommend the solution to other users. Technologies have advanced over time, and there are better tools in the market. I'm not sure if Nudetect has been able to maintain its pace with other training tools. Nudetect is good for certain organizations, but it may not fit everyone. It depends upon the level of security and risk appetite organizations may have based on their responsibility to regulators. Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Let's put it this way, it's like going from Larder to a Ferrari."
"The technical support team is professional and attentive to our needs and concerns."
"It's the security and protection it offers our customers."
"Helped reduce 3-D Secure losses to one of the lowest in the industry while having minimal customer impact."
"They are excellent."
"This is a good product, which is easy to deploy and has lot of user friendly features."
"The service works as described, the Admin console is very good along with customer service, and the management support, which is excellent."
"I think stability-wise, we've not really had any issues in terms of stability."
"We integrate the solution with our Java on the UI and try to identify fraud."
 

Cons

"I think improvements for us, it's making it simple enough that anybody can understand how it works."
"We need more improvement in the Arcot console, which is used in monitoring 3DS transactions for example caching real time transactions rather than getting them after two or three hours."
"An area of improvement for this product would be the ability to view more transactional data to determine the cause of a failed transaction."
"In the first two years, there were several issues with stability."
"I had wish it would be this one, this authentication for fingerprint and face would be promising."
"Probably having more flexibility and working on usability and how we use the solution."
"At the moment, getting into that rich data is quite an effort."
"Their response time was amazing, but it took a lot of time and the responses that we got were not really satisfactory, so it took a lot of time and alterations to get something fixed, which should have been fixed much earlier."
"The tool is not very accurate, and its accuracy could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Utilize the transaction pricing model versus the active cards because the ability to monitor active cards hasn’t been good."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
15%
Construction Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
30%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Performing Arts
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise12
No data available
 

Also Known As

CA Risk Analytics, CA Transaction Manager, CA Payment Security Suite
Nudata Nudetect
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Eurocard
Clydesdale Bank (incorporating Yorkshire Bank), Danske Bank, Metro Bank, Monzo Bank, Starling Bank.
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, BioCatch, NICE and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: October 2026.
920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.