We performed a comparison between Broadcom Clarity and ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's definitely improving our ability to make better decisions, and improving the quality of data that we have, to make the decisions for the strategic good of the company."
"Right now, it's the PPM piece of it, the scheduling, the Gantt, the task view."
"It is easier to use than most other products that are out there."
"The ability to have all of the data in one place from risks and issues to resource capacity and actual utilization."
"It is a scalable, easy-to-deploy, and user-friendly solution for enterprise businesses."
"I enjoy the Risks/Issues section.I use that to raise things before they happen."
"The solution is technically fine and user friendly."
"Having information all together in one single source."
"Competitive in terms of research"
"The stability is excellent. ServiceNow is one of the leading platforms when it comes to stability."
"The resource manager is useful."
"The technical support is pretty good. ServiceNow has consistently provided excellent assistance."
"It's a very complete solution."
"The solution was quite easy to use. The interface was quite user-friendly, and I've become quite familiar with it."
"We mainly use the solution to support operations and align our ITSM operations with our business goals. This involves coordinating between our application development, support teams, and network engineering teams. When there's an issue at the product or network level, we raise a ticket, and our team works together to resolve it."
"The product is quite convenient and user-friendly."
"CA Communities need a lot of improvement."
"Financials are okay, but there's a lot of room for improvement in financials.Financial plans, if those could be made so that you're not always grouping your financial data by predefined attributes, that would be helpful for us."
"When we upgraded to 15.1, we had some challenges around Jaspersoft, and also some issues with supporting some of the complex process work flows that we had designed internally, that were affected by some changes in the process engine."
"The Work Breakdown Structure in the Tasks: I should be able to drag and drop to a level three instead of just stuck at level two."
"In the future, I would like to see integrated Agile features and better integration with Agile tools."
"In the timesheet UX, you can't do things like splitting time, managing overtime versus regular time, very easily. That would be helpful."
"In terms of what could be improved, the end user interface could be improved to be more intuitive, because we sometimes have issues with customization. Sometimes we are not able to customize everything for the end user's interface, and they require more customization. We should be able to perform a deeper customization here."
"Clarity PPM would be improved by developing better support for the Agile framework."
"The interface isn't user-friendly."
"The timing reporting module, and how it's used is a bit difficult to understand. Everything related to project management is quite extensive. It needs to be simplified. At first, our users didn't want to use it, because it seems a bit complex."
"When we originally set it up, we had some kind of success manager free of charge, and now it's an additional charge over and above what we're paying."
"The cost could be improved. The solution is quite pricey."
"The solution needs a few things in terms of resource management."
"The product does not give us the freedom to capture all the instances, test cases, and evidence."
"Dashboard interface is limited functionally and not very user friendly"
"The setup is a bit complex. It depends on the organizational needs, and sometimes, we make customizations based on those needs."
More ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Broadcom Clarity is ranked 2nd in Project Portfolio Management with 136 reviews while ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is ranked 3rd in Project Portfolio Management with 27 reviews. Broadcom Clarity is rated 8.0, while ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom Clarity writes "A dynamic solution with a lot of great out-of-the-box calculations, but integration with reporting utilities is a bit painful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management writes "A very strategic demand management tool that visualizes risks and ratings in a bubble chart". Broadcom Clarity is most compared with Microsoft Project, Jira, Planview Portfolios, Smartsheet and monday.com, whereas ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Jira Align, Microsoft Project Server and monday.com. See our Broadcom Clarity vs. ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.