Bosch inubit vs Oracle BPM comparison

Bosch and Oracle are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Bosch is ranked #44, while Oracle is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0. Bosch holds a 0.2% mindshare in BPM, compared to Oracle’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Bosch users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Bosch inubit

Read 2 Bosch inubit reviews

251 Views
77 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle BPM

Read 25 Oracle BPM reviews

1,404 Views
517 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Bosch inubit

Oracle BPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Oracle BPM and Bosch inubit are competing products in the business process management sphere. Oracle BPM has a stronger focus on comprehensive process automation and integration, while Bosch inubit stands out in modular architecture and IoT integration.

Features: Oracle BPM offers robust process automation, strong analytics capabilities, and comprehensive workflow management. Bosch inubit provides flexible integration with IoT systems, modular design supporting interoperability, and easy customization options for diverse process needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle BPM provides a cloud-based deployment model with extensive documentation and support, enhancing scalability and support efficiency. Bosch inubit offers both on-premise and cloud options, focusing on ease of installation and a supportive customer service team.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle BPM generally requires a higher initial investment due to its advanced capabilities, leading to a potentially higher long-term ROI. Bosch inubit presents a more cost-effective solution upfront with a solid ROI from its modular approach, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bosch inubit

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

44th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle BPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

15th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Bosch inubit is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle BPM is 2.0%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

it_user1288188

DevOps engineer at Swiss Post Solutions

Has reliable technical support and good stability

From my experience using Bosch, I would recommend it to somebody considering it. I would rate it an eight out of ten. There are better solutions on the market. To make it a perfect ten, they should improve the price. There is a learning curve and sometimes there are issues from the software.

Read full review

Erick Kathurima

CIO at Clarinox Technologies Kenya

Helpful tool for business process management integration and a straightforward setup

Oracle BPM is used as a tool integrated into another system. It helps in business process management and the generation of reports, predominantly at the end of the month For any new deployment of any system, it helps in improving some efficiencies, which is the reason for having the system. It…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We contact their customer support often. They are very good and reliable."

"We have more than 800 distinct applications in our IT landscape. We had enough scalability and okay development cycles, and it has been enough to cover our backup operations and order management systems."

"What I found most valuable in Oracle BPM is that it has a lot of out-of-the-box integrations. The solution also provides a lot of adapters which is very helpful."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"Currently, we define the tasks, and based on certain decision rules, the tool decides the task priorities and the time frame of the task."

"We selected this solution not only for the BPM but for the entire package."

"The most valuable feature is the complete workflow through the BPM, from making it available as a generated code based on the backend, deploying it in the test environment, and then going to production."

"It is easy and cheap."

"The processor management system is quite fast and scalable. We have 10 developers using this solution and it supports 25,000 users."

More Oracle BPM pros

Cons

"There are better solutions on the market. To make it a perfect ten, they should improve the price. There is a learning curve and sometimes there are issues from the software."

"The default Workspace does not meet all our needs and sometimes you need to create your own custom Workspace."

"You have to maintain it manually."

"It could have easier administration. It takes time to configure and deploy."

"Though Oracle BPM is a stable solution, it's very heavy, so this is one area for improvement. If Oracle can make the components of Oracle BPM lighter, and if the deployment for the solution could be easier, that would make Oracle BPM better."

"From my knowledge of this solution, I don't see that the Oracle BPM includes features such as the growth of discovery and process mining."

"Every time we roll out a new version of processes, we have to migrate to a new process. The process of this migration was not very smooth. We later decided that it would be easier for us to stop all processes, deploy a new version and then restart."

"The solution needs to offer better integration with third-party systems."

"Their Case Management set of features is severely lacking and should be a target for immediate improvement dealing with unpredictable processes inside of organizations."

More Oracle BPM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The licensing for this product is very costly. We pay for a yearly license to use Oracle BPM."

"We received the product packaged into the Oracle database solution."

"It's pried high, this solution is expensive."

"This solution is very expensive. You are charged per license and an additional 20% for support."

"The pricing is very expensive."

"The licensing model is good."

"Oracle is good, but they're still expensive compared to other vendors."

"The pricing is significantly high, particularly for Brazil where fluctuations in the exchange rate between the dollar and the real can further increase the cost of Oracle licenses."

More Oracle BPM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Wireless Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Oracle BPM?

The solution provides extensive functionalities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle BPM?

The licensing is expensive. It needs to be more affordable, especially in the Kenyan market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle BPM?

Oracle BPM should ensure its product is aligned with current technology by keeping up with advancements like AI. There are delays in offering the latest technology, so there is a need to be more re...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bosch inubit

Compared 100% of the time

More Bosch inubit Competitors

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Oracle BPM

Compared 28% of the time

Camunda vs Oracle BPM

Compared 25% of the time

IBM BPM vs Oracle BPM

Compared 15% of the time

AWS Step Functions vs Oracle BPM

Compared 10% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Oracle BPM

Compared 8% of the time

More Oracle BPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

June 2025

Download Bosch inubit product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BPM

June 2025

Download Oracle BPM product report

Also Known As

inubit

Oracle Business Process Management

Overview

BPM+ expands classical Business Process Management that so far had a strong focus on the process management perspective. The new inubit Suite 6 reconciles data and process management and supports all process types such as Human Workslows, integration centric and document centric processes.

Bosch

The Industry's Most Complete and Unified BPM Solution A complete solution for all types of processes that provides a unified process foundation, user-centric design, and social BPM interaction. Reduces complexity and risk and increases business efficiency, visibility, and agility.

Oracle

Sample Customers

BAFzA

State Revenue Office Victoria, New South Wales Health, REDISA, Panduit, Total E&P Indonesie

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

June 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Automation Anywhere, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.