QlikView and Board compete in the business intelligence sector, each having unique advantages. QlikView appears advantageous due to its robust data visualization and analysis features, while Board excels in integrating analytics with planning capabilities.
Features: QlikView offers dynamic dashboards, associative data exploration, and supports complex scripting for diverse data sources. Board provides a unified platform with analytics, forecasting, and planning, alongside customized report generation, enhancing predictive capabilities.
Room for Improvement: QlikView could enhance user-friendliness by simplifying its scripting language and reducing deployment complexity. Board might improve its interface for easier navigation and expand its data integration capabilities. Both could benefit from streamlining initial setup processes.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QlikView offers traditional deployment with comprehensive documentation but requires technical expertise. Board's cloud-based deployment simplifies the process with strong customer support, making it faster to integrate into existing systems.
Pricing and ROI: QlikView generally involves higher initial costs, promising long-term ROI through rich features. Board's subscription pricing aligns with its extensive planning capabilities, offering flexibility and appealing to varied business sizes seeking integrated solutions.
It's hard for me to gauge the monetary benefits, but the time saved in budgeting and forecasting processes indicates a definite bonus.
The biggest return on investment is the time saving for the customer.
As long as I go through my account manager, I receive very good support.
I would rate the customer support a solid 10.
I am totally satisfied with technical support from Qlik.
If you want better performance with a larger volume of data, you can simply add an additional server.
Board's stability is excellent, with uptime around ninety-nine point nine percent, and I have not experienced any issues.
If the design isn't right, the flexibility of Board can negatively impact performance.
It would be beneficial to have AI or ML features in QlikView.
In QlikView, I believe the improvement that should be made is to bring the costs down, as you'll have to be competitive with Power BI, aiming for at least a 30% reduction to stop the hemorrhaging to Power BI.
I would rate the pricing for QlikView as not cheap, but it is reasonable.
The license cost per user or per year for QlikView is about 500 Euros annually.
Our budgeting and forecasting processes support around three hundred twenty users who would otherwise rely on Excel, making Board invaluable for saving time.
The best features in QlikView are rapid development, the fact that I can do what I want in QlikView, and full control along with ease of use.
Building metrics using simple language, similar to what you have in Excel, is what I have found most valuable in QlikView.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| QlikView | 3.8% |
| Board | 1.8% |
| Other | 94.4% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 73 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 36 |
| Large Enterprise | 76 |
Board offers a customizable platform perfect for quick setup and minimal maintenance with efficient data handling for real-time reporting, visualization, and analysis.
Users leverage Board for budgeting, forecasting, and financial reporting, appreciating its effective performance in capturing operational and financial data. Despite some initial adjustments when transitioning from Excel, organizations commend its design and flexibility. Though improvements are needed in spell check, scalability, and data import error messages, the promise of updates in BOARD 11 is noteworthy, especially for better data presentation control. Users are keen on enhanced integration, security, visualization, and Excel functionalities.
What are Board's most valuable features?Board's implementation spans industries, focusing on budgeting, forecasting, and financial reporting. Many organizations cite improved sales forecasting and strategic planning capabilities, appreciating the transition from traditional methods. The dual data entry feature remains valuable, balancing flexibility and industry-specific requirements.
QlikView enhances data analysis with its associative data model and rapid in-memory processing, providing dynamic dashboards and robust visualization, while efficient data integration allows connections to multiple sources.
QlikView offers powerful analytics and insight generation capabilities through its integration with Salesforce, enabling real-time sales data access. Its customizable dashboards are complemented by scripting for complex calculations and QVDs for performance optimization. Designed to be user-friendly, it supports ETL processes and diverse data browsing, allowing users to interact with data intuitively. However, there is room for improving licensing complexities, scalability, and self-service functionality. Additional enhancements are desired in visualization, integration with Qlik Sense, and predictive analytics support.
What are QlikView's key features?QlikView finds use in building business intelligence dashboards across sectors, integrating with Salesforce for analytics, supporting financial planning, and tracking sales. Its intuitive interface aids manufacturing companies in KPI monitoring and informs commercial decisions. The tool enhances reporting, ETL processes, and diverse data source integration, facilitating offline data access.
We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
