BMC Track-It! vs Device42 comparison

Why PeerSpot?

BMC Helix and Device42 are both solutions in the IT Asset Management category. BMC Helix is ranked #17, while Device42 is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2. Additionally, 66% of BMC Helix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Device42 users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

BMC Track-It! and Device42 compete in the IT management sector. BMC Track-It! tends to be favored for its cost-effectiveness and customer support, while Device42 is seen as superior for businesses needing advanced asset management features.

Features: BMC Track-It! provides asset inventory and software inventory management, supports multiscans to find unknown devices, and has strong help desk and purchasing modules. Device42 offers automated IT asset discovery, application dependency mapping, and IP address tracking. Its agentless discovery ensures continuous asset management.

Room for Improvement: BMC Track-It! could improve in areas such as scalability for larger enterprises, integrating more advanced analytics tools, and enhancing its mobile interface. Device42 might focus on refining its agentless discovery for environments with strict security protocols, simplifying its reporting capabilities, and reducing the complexity of its initial setup process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC Track-It! is known for a straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, ensuring quick setup and maintenance. Device42's deployment can be more complex due to its comprehensive feature set, but strong support is available to assist in implementation.

Pricing and ROI: BMC Track-It! is appreciated for being budget-friendly with satisfactory ROI for organizations with financial constraints. Device42 might involve higher initial costs but delivers significant ROI by offering detailed infrastructure insights, appealing to businesses ready to invest for advanced functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Track-It! vs. Device42 Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Track-It! vs. Device42

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automation Anywhere

Featured Reviews

Nadeem K.

Rpa Developer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

Automation has freed teams from repetitive finance and supply tasks and supports global operations

In the current organization, we had trouble initially because I think the documentation and support could be better than what it is now. This is one difference between Automation Anywhere and other RPA tools such as UiPath. In UiPath, if you have an issue, you go to the UiPath website and search for it, and you get lots of help materials. In Automation Anywhere, you do not get exactly what you are looking for. You get a very large number of results when you search for something, and from this large result set, you have to filter out what you need, or only partial information will be available. User handbooks are available for each product. In that regard, I would say Automation Anywhere is lagging compared to other RPA tools. It is difficult to get hold of their customer support team. I want to clarify that it is not a matter of us building logic on Automation Anywhere and it failing. When it is a product-related issue, they have to give us support because we only know how to develop within Automation Anywhere. We do not know how to fix Automation Anywhere itself. Whenever we have an issue, trying to get in touch with them always takes three to four business days.

Read full review

reviewer2287086

ICT Manager at a legal firm with 11-50 employees

Provides good stability, but it could be intuitive and easier to use

The product’s current version could be easier and straightforward to work with small IT organizations, similar to the older version. Its asset management feature has been significantly affected since the upgrade. Earlier, it was able to perform skill-based routing automatically. We could set up parameters within the system and view the details of the incident or a ticket. The same functionality needs to be fine-tuned in the new system.

Read full review

Manmohan Rao

Associate Vice President at Hitachi Systems India Private Limited

Granular discovery has ensured confident workload migration and optimized cloud move group planning

Device42 offers the best features for workload assessment, particularly useful for cloud-to-cloud workload or on-premise data center workload, especially when planning for workload migration to the public cloud. For application and infrastructure discovery, Device42 has enabled me to know the number of machines running in the on-premise environment and has managed to capture complete utilization metrics or trends of their utilization. This has benefited me in right-sizing systems for my public cloud total cost of ownership (TCO) planning, providing me granularity to right-size these systems while planning a migration to the public cloud. Device42 has positively impacted my organization by providing granularity toward application discovery compared to other assessment tools, which is a differentiator since none of the other tools provide such granularity, leading to better decision-making for my migration to the public cloud. Device42 has improved my migration projects by providing granularity around system dependencies that gave me confidence knowing which systems communicate with each other parked in a particular move group. My move group planning became so robust that I am not leaving any system behind in the on-premise data center from my planning, which saves a lot of time and effort, leading to cost optimization—a value addition.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of use is the most valuable feature. It's very easy to use, so to get started, you don't really need hardcore development skills."

"Since implementing the solution, the tasks are taking place in a seamless manner. As long as the process is not changed, there is the ease of replicability. Repeatable tasks constantly get done without any challenges."

"Many of our tasks are automated using AA and due to ease in handling, it becomes the first choice in terms of RPA tool."

"Support for Automation Anywhere is wonderful; I had an issue related to Chrome not working with the latest update, and they helped me extensively and even came on call to support me."

"The recording feature accelerates the timeline of your implementation."

"The initial deployment is not difficult at all for someone doing it for the first time."

"Its integration with source control is very refreshing. There could be a little bit more maturity around how to do some of the features, but not having to go outside the app, not having a separate set of procedures, allows you to check in and check out right from within the app. You can make edits and uploads and undo your checkouts."

"Our ROI has ranged from thousands to hundreds of thousands, depending on the type of process being automated."

More Automation Anywhere pros

"The customization of the product and reporting capabilities have allowed us to provide upper management the graphs (data) they request that helps validate specific needs that we (IT) have."

"Using their problem management process, we can use parent/child tickets and set up public views for our problem work orders."

"The solution is quite stable, and we've found it to be reliable and free from bugs and glitches that affect its usability."

"As a department, we have been able to identify problems and resolve them faster because of the centralized database."

"We use it to create and manage our work orders."

"The initial setup is pretty easy."

"Our efficiency has improved drastically due to a massive reduction in phone calls."

"Track-It! has many features that help make us more efficient and cost effective as a department."

More BMC Track-It! pros

"Device42 has everything in one place and links it altogether, which helps when you need to figure out where things are going wrong, where things are happening, or how everything is linked together."

"Device42 positively impacts my organization because we build the as-is as soon as possible, avoiding the delays we would face with the network or security teams, and I captured more than 100 traffic entries in just two weeks, which was great."

"One of the most valuable features in my experience is the precise tracking of hardware devices and their locations registered in the solution. The solution allows to determine the exact placement of assets based on the building maps and the room details. This feature has allowed us to gain upper hand on the customers and provide them with a great satisfaction because they can visually see the arrangement of their assets within the organisation or building."

"The solution's agentless approach to asset discovery is very important for us because installing agents on physical or virtual devices is not easy in our company. We have to escalate these kinds of things to different levels of security. Not having to install agents makes it easy for us."

"The topology layout is the most valuable feature."

"The continuous asset discovery is good because it means not having to manually input all the small data, such as IP addresses, leases, etc. It helps and saves us a lot of time."

"They've also just created some new interactive dashboards. CEOs can see and interact with the data rather than scrolling through endless Excel worksheets to find what they need."

"Device42 has positively impacted my organization by offering me full visibility over all the assets we have."

More Device42 pros

Cons

"The bot creation process is straightforward in some ways and complicated in others. You can get your initial stuff laid out really quick, but then putting in your exception handling is more time consuming."

"Copilot is an area with a lot of scope for improvement. It's the number one thing to improve."

"The technical support has been a little slow to respond to our inquiries."

"We would like a better coding interface for developers. We would also like to have a user interface which reduces the time to learn the product so more people in the organization can use software, like Automation Anywhere, quickly automating processes."

"The error handling command on this solution still needs improvement, especially when compared to other platforms that are doing very well."

"Technical support is not very good and they sometimes promise what they cannot deliver. They promised us that they would implement multitrigger and according to sources delivery of that functionality is not in their plans."

"IQ Bot requires a significant improvement for its data detection and data retention, mainly from the previously trained documents: regarding the document's format, layout, data contained within the document, the type of data that needs to be extracted."

"We have a few issues which have persisted. These end up restarting the machine. We are hoping in version 11.3 of Automation Anywhere, our compatibility and infrastructure issues will be resolved."

More Automation Anywhere cons

"There are a few items that I would like changed or extra features that could be added to our current version of this software, but those are all going to be addressed in a future software update."

"The product’s current version could be easier and straightforward to work with small IT organizations, similar to the older version."

"The solution is cumbersome to use."

"The area where we would like to see improvement is in the asset management module."

"Their self-service is not user friendly."

"Currently, if you go and check the reports in the packet, the reports are useless; reporting is really bad."

"Track-It! works great for a mid-size company, but anything over 700 employees, and trying to use Track-It! for any other areas of the business is difficult."

"The architecture is a bit old-fashioned. Device42 is on one server, appliance, virtual machine, or guest. We are loading more into Device42 than it can hold. Overloading Device42 with REST API calls or tasks will directly impact every aspect because the server will be too busy to answer requests."

"I think Device42 can be improved by adding more features around the CMDB aspect and lifecycle management."

"Their pricing model is very poor. For instance, software licensing, at one point in the distant past, was a standard feature."

"The solution’s automatic IT asset discovery and inventory functionality functions pretty well. There could be some improvement if there were some automated scripts to get it off the ground. I know it takes a bit of effort to get all of various managed devices into one place. We have to go and change how they are managed and make sure they are all linking up correctly so they can be tracked in Device42. Some type of automated script for each to get over that initial activation."

"I would say it is ninety percent stable, but with every new upgrade or version release, I find that there are many bugs."

"From a documentation and reporting standpoint, at present, it is useful, but I feel that it can be improved because it currently feels incomplete in certain areas."

"The breadth and depth of the solution's discovery of IT asset information means the system does most of the work, but they need to work on improving the database discovery part, especially for Oracle Exadata."

"However, the documentation has not been updated in a while, so it needs updates."

More Device42 cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"More than 40 to 50 percent of the IT budget will be for the cost of automation projects in the coming years since these projects enhance operations add value."

"Automation Anywhere's price is considerably better than UiPath's."

"This solution costs approximately $3,500 USD per license."

"The cost is anywhere between $10,000 and $100,000."

"They recently launched a Community Edition, which is okay, but they should have done this a long time ago."

"The licensing cost for Automation Anywhere is high."

"Their licensing processes are in par with most industry standards."

"It's very good in terms of cost and pricing."

More Automation Anywhere pricing and cost advice

"BMC Track-It!’s price is reasonable compared to other products."

"The product cost is low. It is quite cheap."

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"We pay $100,000 per year."

"Functionality-wise, Device42 is on par with industry standards, but price-wise, the solution is expensive. I'm rating the pricing for the solution as eight out of ten."

"On a yearly basis, our licensing is $10,000. However, our license is now nearly full with devices. We need the next bigger license with 5,000 devices, which will cost us $19,000. We pay for a set of licenses, a maximum number of devices, and a maximum number of IP addresses. We have the smallest amount of features, which is enough for us at this time."

"I am not involved in its pricing, but I have seen their plans during a discussion with the customer. For 500 servers, they were asking 50,000 USD. The cost of BMC Discovery was less than half. For the same thing, they were charging only 10,000 USD. Its pricing needs to be improved. As compared to other discovery tools, such as BMC Discovery and ServiceNow Discovery, its price is a little bit higher."

"It's in the top-three most expensive solutions in terms of cost, but it has all the features that are needed."

"The problem with using other vendor, like BMC, is the pricing. The price is so horrible and nobody wants to pay this money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

No data available

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	162
Midsize Enterprise	86
Large Enterprise	566

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It depends on your use case. Is it simply to automate a couple of processes? Is it to augment a human team? AA is ver...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

From my experience using AA tool, it depends on the applications that you want to automate, because there some applic...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It is a highly preferred RPA tool. You can check my Automation Anywhere Review to know more.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Device42?

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Device42 are relatively cost-effective and affordable. I do not know if a ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Device42?

I think Device42 can be improved by adding more features around the CMDB aspect and lifecycle management. I do not th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Device42?

My main use case for Device42 is that we use it as a CMDB and affinity map to check out network topology or determine...

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 10% of the time

Blue Prism vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 4% of the time

AutomationEdge vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 3% of the time

HyperScience vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 2% of the time

More Automation Anywhere Competitors

ServiceNow vs BMC Track-It!

Compared 13% of the time

BMC Helix Discovery vs BMC Track-It!

Compared 12% of the time

Lansweeper vs BMC Track-It!

Compared 7% of the time

USU Valuemation vs BMC Track-It!

Compared 7% of the time

More BMC Track-It! Competitors

FNT Command Platform vs Device42

Compared 6% of the time

Freshservice vs Device42

Compared 6% of the time

ServiceNow CMDB vs Device42

Compared 6% of the time

NetBox.dev vs Device42

Compared 5% of the time

Faddom vs Device42

Compared 5% of the time

More Device42 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automation Anywhere

November 2026

Download Automation Anywhere product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Asset Management

October 2026

Download BMC Track-It! product report

Buyer's Guide

Device42

November 2026

Download Device42 product report

Also Known As

Automation Anywhere, Testing Anywhere, Automation Anywhere Enterprise, Agentic Process Automation System (Now Certified for WorkSpaces)

BMC Numara Track-It!, Numara Track-It!, Numara

No data available

Interactive Demo

Automation Anywhere

Demo not available

BMC Helix

Demo not available

Device42

Overview

Automation Anywhere offers ease of use, robust system connectivity, and GenAI-driven document automation through a cloud-native platform, significantly enhancing productivity across multiple industries with advanced AI features.

Delivering a comprehensive suite of tools designed for easy integration and rapid deployment, Automation Anywhere drives efficiency by reducing costs and automating repetitive tasks. Its cloud-native platform supports broad industry adoption, including advanced AI features like process automation and Co-Pilot, streamlining complex workflows with minimal technical skills required. Users benefit from robust integration capabilities, which facilitate seamless interaction with multiple systems. However, there is room for improvement in areas such as user-friendliness for beginners, stability, flexible licensing, and enhanced OCR functionality. Organizations in sectors such as banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare gain from the improved operational efficiency and ROI Automation Anywhere offers.

What are the important features of Automation Anywhere?

Ease of Use: Simplifies automation tasks with a user-centric interface.
Robust Connectivity: Provides seamless integration with multiple systems.
GenAI-Driven Document Automation: Leverages AI to automate document management.
Process Automation & Co-Pilot: Enhances workflow automation with advanced AI.
Cloud-Native Platform: Enables rapid deployment and integration.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces manual processing time.
Cost Efficiency: Decreases overall operational costs by automating tasks.
Productivity Enhancement: Streamlines workflows with AI-driven tools.
Improved Integration: Enhances ability to work with multiple systems.
Scalability: Supports growth with a flexible cloud-native architecture.

In the insurance industry, Automation Anywhere is utilized for automating processes such as enrollment management and compliance checks. Its applications extend to supply chain management, financial transactions, and business performance monitoring across sectors like banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare, helping organizations to automate routine tasks, improve efficiency, and reduce costs.

Automation Anywhere

BMC Track-It! offers robust customization and reporting, allowing effective IT management through essential data provision, ease of setup, and maintaining stability.

Organizations employ BMC Track-It! primarily for help desk management, effectively managing incidents, service requests, and IT assets. It facilitates logging and resolving calls, improving proactive responses and accommodating growing IT service demands. Users highlight its capabilities in change and problem management, ensuring availability and prompt response even under increased workloads.

What are the key features of BMC Track-It!?

Customization and Reporting: Allows tailored solutions and essential data provision for validating IT needs.
Parent/Child Ticket Feature: Enhances tracking by linking related tickets together.
Audit Trail and User Surveys: Keeps detailed records of changes and obtains user feedback for improvements.
Help Desk and Purchasing Modules: Offers comprehensive issue tracking, trend analysis, and manages stock and work orders.
Flexible Setup Process: Ensures ease of implementation without enforcing strict processes on technicians.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Efficiency: By efficiently managing calls and incidents, users can focus on more strategic tasks.
Improved Response Times: Fast resolution of tickets ensures high availability of IT services.
Flexible Implementation: The straightforward setup allows quick adaptation to organizational workflows.
Reduced Service Desk Calls: Proactive management reduces overall demand for service desk support.

BMC Track-It! is widely implemented across industries to support IT management needs, providing effective help desk solutions that balance user demands and technology capabilities. Its integration is particularly noticeable in sectors with complex IT infrastructures requiring reliable service management and asset tracking.

BMC Helix

Device42 empowers enterprises with automatic IT asset discovery, application dependency mapping, and agentless discovery, streamlining asset management, improving decision-making, and supporting migration initiatives.

Device42 automates network discovery and provides comprehensive IT data management, making it indispensable for asset and infrastructure management. The platform’s integration capabilities, such as with ServiceNow, allow seamless management of physical and virtual environments. Its application dependency mapping is a critical feature for efficient cloud migration, while advanced search and dashboards enhance operational tasks. Device42's ease of deployment coupled with integration into cloud services offers robust operational insights and simplifies onboarding.

What are Device42's key features?

Automatic IT Asset Discovery: Enables detailed information collection on hardware and software.
Application Dependency Mapping: Facilitates tracking of application dependencies for effective cloud migration.
Agentless Discovery: Assists in uncovering assets without the need for specialized agents.
Network Topology Visualization: Assists in visual representation of network connections.
Cloud Integration: Simplifies the integration with cloud services for enhanced insights.

What benefits should be evaluated in Device42?

Improved Decision-Making: Optimizes resource utilization and boosts strategic initiatives.
Seamless Integration: Enhances connectivity with platforms like ServiceNow.
Efficiency in Auditing: Eases compliance and auditing processes.
Simplified Onboarding: Streamlines initial setups and deployment.
Enhanced Operational Insights: Supports better management through comprehensive data visualization.

Device42 is widely used across sectors for IT asset and infrastructure management, where automation in inventory and documentation aids compliance and resource optimization. It excels in industries requiring integration with existing systems and comprehensive network solutions. Application dependency mapping bolsters cloud migration efficiency in enterprise environments.

Device42

Sample Customers

Google, Linkedin, Cisco, Juniper Networks, DellEMC, Comcast, Mastercard, Quest Diagnostics

Florida Hospital, Mitchell International

Computershare, Concur, Doosan, Fitch Ratings Inc., Fujitsu, HomeAway, Jasper Wireless, Mercedes-Benz, Square, Twitch, UCSB, Zayo Group Inc.

Buyer's Guide

BMC Track-It! vs. Device42

November 2026

Free Report: BMC Track-It! vs. Device42

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Track-It! vs. Device42 and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Track-It! vs. Device42 report.

See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.