BMC Track-It! vs Device42 comparison

Why PeerSpot?

BMC Helix and Device42 are both solutions in the IT Asset Management category. BMC Helix is ranked #18, while Device42 is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2. Additionally, 66% of BMC Helix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Device42 users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

BMC Track-It! and Device42 compete in the IT management sector. BMC Track-It! tends to be favored for its cost-effectiveness and customer support, while Device42 is seen as superior for businesses needing advanced asset management features.

Features: BMC Track-It! provides asset inventory and software inventory management, supports multiscans to find unknown devices, and has strong help desk and purchasing modules. Device42 offers automated IT asset discovery, application dependency mapping, and IP address tracking. Its agentless discovery ensures continuous asset management.

Room for Improvement: BMC Track-It! could improve in areas such as scalability for larger enterprises, integrating more advanced analytics tools, and enhancing its mobile interface. Device42 might focus on refining its agentless discovery for environments with strict security protocols, simplifying its reporting capabilities, and reducing the complexity of its initial setup process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC Track-It! is known for a straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, ensuring quick setup and maintenance. Device42's deployment can be more complex due to its comprehensive feature set, but strong support is available to assist in implementation.

Pricing and ROI: BMC Track-It! is appreciated for being budget-friendly with satisfactory ROI for organizations with financial constraints. Device42 might involve higher initial costs but delivers significant ROI by offering detailed infrastructure insights, appealing to businesses ready to invest for advanced functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Track-It! vs. Device42 Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Track-It! vs. Device42

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 918,169 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automation Anywhere

Featured Reviews

Venkat Sivaprakash

Management Consultant at Accenture

Has significantly improved document-driven workflows and reduced processing time across finance and HR functions

Automation Anywhere has evolved significantly and upgraded itself to provide agentic AI and AI-based automation solutions for document automation. The product has matured considerably over time. We can create workflows that can call an API. We can include prompts in particular workflows for ChatGPT-related functions, connecting to an LLM and RAG to perform tasks. For document automation, modern features are available to train documents, ensuring high accuracy and repeatability over time. The system is very easy to use. I recently completed a course in document automation, typically designed for people involved in coding and technical aspects. Though I understand coding comprehensively, I don't do actual coding. The course was very accessible. Currently, extensive coding isn't necessary due to the hybrid model incorporating GenAI aspects, low-code, no-code capabilities, APIs, and numerous pre-built objects in Automation Anywhere. The features include GenAI-driven prompting methods and workflow creation capabilities. In these workflows, we can create decision boxes and call APIs without coding. We simply pull objects, drop them, connect them, and add minimal coding when needed. The most crucial aspect isn't coding but rather sizing the automation and fleshing out the details. Automation Co-pilot takes notes and performs automated analysis. It can extract details from videos, summarize conversations, and provide detailed information. During calls, it identifies instructions and performs tasks such as preparing reports and reconciliation. Automation Anywhere can also connect with Microsoft Co-pilot. Through Co-pilot, real-time operations can be executed, allowing direct interaction between vendors and automation through this component.

Read full review

reviewer2287086

ICT Manager at a legal firm with 11-50 employees

Provides good stability, but it could be intuitive and easier to use

The product’s current version could be easier and straightforward to work with small IT organizations, similar to the older version. Its asset management feature has been significantly affected since the upgrade. Earlier, it was able to perform skill-based routing automatically. We could set up parameters within the system and view the details of the incident or a ticket. The same functionality needs to be fine-tuned in the new system.

Read full review

Manmohan Rao

Associate Vice President at Hitachi Systems India Private Limited

Granular discovery has ensured confident workload migration and optimized cloud move group planning

Device42 offers the best features for workload assessment, particularly useful for cloud-to-cloud workload or on-premise data center workload, especially when planning for workload migration to the public cloud. For application and infrastructure discovery, Device42 has enabled me to know the number of machines running in the on-premise environment and has managed to capture complete utilization metrics or trends of their utilization. This has benefited me in right-sizing systems for my public cloud total cost of ownership (TCO) planning, providing me granularity to right-size these systems while planning a migration to the public cloud. Device42 has positively impacted my organization by providing granularity toward application discovery compared to other assessment tools, which is a differentiator since none of the other tools provide such granularity, leading to better decision-making for my migration to the public cloud. Device42 has improved my migration projects by providing granularity around system dependencies that gave me confidence knowing which systems communicate with each other parked in a particular move group. My move group planning became so robust that I am not leaving any system behind in the on-premise data center from my planning, which saves a lot of time and effort, leading to cost optimization—a value addition.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Automation Anywhere (AA) is easy to use and understand, even if the user didn't have previous experience with RPA (robotic process automation) software before."

"We used to do many daily routine checks and jobs. We have implemented the automation knowledge which resulted in good productivity, time-saving, and extra efforts being reduced."

"The bot creation process is easy, manageable, and everything is well-organized for a developer. Everything is centralized."

"Ease of use is one thing that definitely first comes to mind when I think of Automation Anywhere. The tools are built in a fairly straightforward way. The documentation is really good and a Knowledge Base is available on every topic."

"We have a very resourceful pipeline to use AA bots in our RPA projects and we are looking to be more engaged with the AA team in deploying these bots."

"The most valuable feature is its Excel integration."

"It frees individuals up from mundane tasks so they can concentrate on being more active and creative other things that they need to do."

"This solution has been great for our company in almost every way possible."

More Automation Anywhere pros

"Using their problem management process, we can use parent/child tickets and set up public views for our problem work orders."

"Track-It! has many features that help make us more efficient and cost effective as a department."

"We use it to create and manage our work orders."

"As a department, we have been able to identify problems and resolve them faster because of the centralized database."

"Our efficiency has improved drastically due to a massive reduction in phone calls."

"Our users have come to expect availability and quick responses, and we are able to provide this thanks to the Track-IT! solution."

"The solution is quite stable, and we've found it to be reliable and free from bugs and glitches that affect its usability."

"We can manually capture the assets available within the location."

More BMC Track-It! pros

"The solution's automatic IT asset discovery and inventory functionality are top-notch. The thing I like is that it's open-source. If I need to change them — and they've given me links on GitHub to have them — I can go and change them to pull exactly what I want, as frequently as I want."

"Previously, our company had a lot of issues keeping track of all the data centers and the inventory, as well as the purchase orders. All of these were managed by other tools. The good thing about Device42 is that it can be used for all this together. We don't need to spend time checking many other tools and files."

"The topology layout is the most valuable feature."

"Device42 is a fantastic tool for workload discovery, and I believe everyone should start using it if they have plans to do so; it is a top-notch tool in the market."

"Device42 will be our single point of truth, and only Device42."

"The solution is agentless."

"Device42 positively impacts our organization by providing dependency mapping for our devices, and it integrates well with applications, especially our cloud service Microsoft Azure, giving us complete visibility across our infrastructure for efficient operations and modern compliance."

"The REST API abilities enables us to run scripts that pull information from our servers about software, storage, etc. Anything we need is pushed through REST API to the Device42 server and reflected in the report it generates."

More Device42 pros

Cons

"While the ease of use for non-tech users is good, it could be improved."

"Queue management is still missing from the latest version which is a barrier to using the platform to start implementing complex cases where you have parent and child transactions going through multiple stages."

"We are still looking into some of its current capabilities, like IT Bot."

"I would like to see web and cloud-based platforms for future releases."

"In order to score nine or ten, they still need to provide more flexibility and integration with other tools and options."

"This solution saves us time but there are some things that make it clumsy for the end-users."

"Their license model needs to be improved. The biggest issue for me is that the license is tied to a person, and it is not something that I can pass if I want to use it for the first five hours and pass it on to you for the next five hours and so on. When we automate, the license is tied to me, and if you or somebody else needs to use that license, as a COE administrator, I need to transfer the license from person A to person B. This is something that I have always told them that should not be this way because you want to utilize your licenses effectively."

"My main issue with Automation Anywhere might be the logging of bots and getting more detailed feedback of what my bot is doing, step by step. It is hard to track fine-tuning in larger codes."

More Automation Anywhere cons

"There are a few items that I would like changed or extra features that could be added to our current version of this software, but those are all going to be addressed in a future software update."

"Track-It! works great for a mid-size company, but anything over 700 employees, and trying to use Track-It! for any other areas of the business is difficult."

"The product’s current version could be easier and straightforward to work with small IT organizations, similar to the older version."

"Their self-service is not user friendly."

"The area where we would like to see improvement is in the asset management module."

"The solution is cumbersome to use."

"Currently, if you go and check the reports in the packet, the reports are useless; reporting is really bad."

"Device42 is a main part of our processes. We need reliability, not only in terms of the data but with the solution itself. It's really difficult when we have 10 minutes of Device42 downtime because none of our teams can work for those 10 minutes, and it's more time lost if there is longer downtime. An improvement would be to have a cluster implementation of Device42 to have high-availability and ensure that we don't have downtime in case of failure."

"For the iPhone, the device diagram cannot be downloaded. You have to go to each device and download the device diagram for that device. E.g., suppose there are a 1000 or 2000 servers. You cannot go to each server or device to download a device diagram for each device. There should be a one-click solution for downloading all device diagrams."

"Device42 can be improved by adding more reporting features and architectural diagrams."

"The dependency mapping can be quite slow sometimes, if you've got a lot of things connecting to services. It can be very slow to build up the map."

"The architecture is a bit old-fashioned. Device42 is on one server, appliance, virtual machine, or guest. We are loading more into Device42 than it can hold. Overloading Device42 with REST API calls or tasks will directly impact every aspect because the server will be too busy to answer requests."

"A con for Device42 is that Kubernetes integration is lacking. You pay for 10,000 spot licenses and if you're spinning up a Kubernetes cluster, or four or five or six Kubernetes clusters like we do, you're going to have 5,000 or 6,000 nodes in each of those, doing different types of business things."

"Their pricing model is very poor. For instance, software licensing, at one point in the distant past, was a standard feature."

"If they could make it so their remote connector could do as much as 10,000 devices, that would be better."

More Device42 cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the solution's pricing is reasonable."

"In terms of pricing, it's not at all cheap, and that's a concern. The licensing cost is very high. While I don't know the exact prices of other tools, Microsoft offers the lowest pricing for its RPA platform compared to UiPath and Automation Anywhere."

"Automation Anywhere is somewhat expensive. The prices are slightly higher, but if you need something, you must pay for it."

"I would rate the cost of Automation Anywhere as a six out of ten, with ten being the most expensive."

"We save approximately 10,000 hours per year."

"They sell it by license, but if they could charge by case or by interaction, that might be better. Right now, it's expensive when you want to scale or use them for simple processes."

"This is a value for the money product."

"It has good licensing costs which are average for the market."

More Automation Anywhere pricing and cost advice

"BMC Track-It!’s price is reasonable compared to other products."

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"Functionality-wise, Device42 is on par with industry standards, but price-wise, the solution is expensive. I'm rating the pricing for the solution as eight out of ten."

"The problem with using other vendor, like BMC, is the pricing. The price is so horrible and nobody wants to pay this money."

"The product cost is low. It is quite cheap."

"I am not involved in its pricing, but I have seen their plans during a discussion with the customer. For 500 servers, they were asking 50,000 USD. The cost of BMC Discovery was less than half. For the same thing, they were charging only 10,000 USD. Its pricing needs to be improved. As compared to other discovery tools, such as BMC Discovery and ServiceNow Discovery, its price is a little bit higher."

"It's in the top-three most expensive solutions in terms of cost, but it has all the features that are needed."

"On a yearly basis, our licensing is $10,000. However, our license is now nearly full with devices. We need the next bigger license with 5,000 devices, which will cost us $19,000. We pay for a set of licenses, a maximum number of devices, and a maximum number of IP addresses. We have the smallest amount of features, which is enough for us at this time."

"We pay $100,000 per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

918,169 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	161
Midsize Enterprise	86
Large Enterprise	563

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It depends on your use case. Is it simply to automate a couple of processes? Is it to augment a human team? AA is ver...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

From my experience using AA tool, it depends on the applications that you want to automate, because there some applic...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It is a highly preferred RPA tool. You can check my Automation Anywhere Review to know more.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Device42?

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Device42 are relatively cost-effective and affordable. I do not know if a ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Device42?

I think Device42 can be improved by adding more features around the CMDB aspect and lifecycle management. I do not th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Device42?

My main use case for Device42 is that we use it as a CMDB and affinity map to check out network topology or determine...

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 10% of the time

Blue Prism vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 4% of the time

AutomationEdge vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 3% of the time

Appian vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 2% of the time

More Automation Anywhere Competitors

ServiceNow vs BMC Track-It!

Compared 15% of the time

BMC Helix Discovery vs BMC Track-It!

Compared 12% of the time

Lansweeper vs BMC Track-It!

Compared 7% of the time

USU Valuemation vs BMC Track-It!

Compared 7% of the time

More BMC Track-It! Competitors

Freshservice vs Device42

Compared 6% of the time

ServiceNow CMDB vs Device42

Compared 6% of the time

NetBox.dev vs Device42

Compared 6% of the time

Faddom vs Device42

Compared 5% of the time

ServiceNow vs Device42

Compared 5% of the time

More Device42 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automation Anywhere

October 2026

Download Automation Anywhere product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Asset Management

September 2026

Download BMC Track-It! product report

Buyer's Guide

Device42

October 2026

Download Device42 product report

Also Known As

Automation Anywhere, Testing Anywhere, Automation Anywhere Enterprise, Agentic Process Automation System (Now Certified for WorkSpaces)

BMC Numara Track-It!, Numara Track-It!, Numara

No data available

Interactive Demo

Automation Anywhere

Demo not available

BMC Helix

Demo not available

Device42

Overview

Automation Anywhere offers ease of use, robust system connectivity, and GenAI-driven document automation through a cloud-native platform, significantly enhancing productivity across multiple industries with advanced AI features.

Delivering a comprehensive suite of tools designed for easy integration and rapid deployment, Automation Anywhere drives efficiency by reducing costs and automating repetitive tasks. Its cloud-native platform supports broad industry adoption, including advanced AI features like process automation and Co-Pilot, streamlining complex workflows with minimal technical skills required. Users benefit from robust integration capabilities, which facilitate seamless interaction with multiple systems. However, there is room for improvement in areas such as user-friendliness for beginners, stability, flexible licensing, and enhanced OCR functionality. Organizations in sectors such as banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare gain from the improved operational efficiency and ROI Automation Anywhere offers.

What are the important features of Automation Anywhere?

Ease of Use: Simplifies automation tasks with a user-centric interface.
Robust Connectivity: Provides seamless integration with multiple systems.
GenAI-Driven Document Automation: Leverages AI to automate document management.
Process Automation & Co-Pilot: Enhances workflow automation with advanced AI.
Cloud-Native Platform: Enables rapid deployment and integration.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces manual processing time.
Cost Efficiency: Decreases overall operational costs by automating tasks.
Productivity Enhancement: Streamlines workflows with AI-driven tools.
Improved Integration: Enhances ability to work with multiple systems.
Scalability: Supports growth with a flexible cloud-native architecture.

In the insurance industry, Automation Anywhere is utilized for automating processes such as enrollment management and compliance checks. Its applications extend to supply chain management, financial transactions, and business performance monitoring across sectors like banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare, helping organizations to automate routine tasks, improve efficiency, and reduce costs.

Automation Anywhere

BMC Track-It! offers robust customization and reporting, allowing effective IT management through essential data provision, ease of setup, and maintaining stability.

Organizations employ BMC Track-It! primarily for help desk management, effectively managing incidents, service requests, and IT assets. It facilitates logging and resolving calls, improving proactive responses and accommodating growing IT service demands. Users highlight its capabilities in change and problem management, ensuring availability and prompt response even under increased workloads.

What are the key features of BMC Track-It!?

Customization and Reporting: Allows tailored solutions and essential data provision for validating IT needs.
Parent/Child Ticket Feature: Enhances tracking by linking related tickets together.
Audit Trail and User Surveys: Keeps detailed records of changes and obtains user feedback for improvements.
Help Desk and Purchasing Modules: Offers comprehensive issue tracking, trend analysis, and manages stock and work orders.
Flexible Setup Process: Ensures ease of implementation without enforcing strict processes on technicians.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Efficiency: By efficiently managing calls and incidents, users can focus on more strategic tasks.
Improved Response Times: Fast resolution of tickets ensures high availability of IT services.
Flexible Implementation: The straightforward setup allows quick adaptation to organizational workflows.
Reduced Service Desk Calls: Proactive management reduces overall demand for service desk support.

BMC Track-It! is widely implemented across industries to support IT management needs, providing effective help desk solutions that balance user demands and technology capabilities. Its integration is particularly noticeable in sectors with complex IT infrastructures requiring reliable service management and asset tracking.

BMC Helix

Device42 empowers enterprises with automatic IT asset discovery, application dependency mapping, and agentless discovery, streamlining asset management, improving decision-making, and supporting migration initiatives.

Device42 automates network discovery and provides comprehensive IT data management, making it indispensable for asset and infrastructure management. The platform’s integration capabilities, such as with ServiceNow, allow seamless management of physical and virtual environments. Its application dependency mapping is a critical feature for efficient cloud migration, while advanced search and dashboards enhance operational tasks. Device42's ease of deployment coupled with integration into cloud services offers robust operational insights and simplifies onboarding.

What are Device42's key features?

Automatic IT Asset Discovery: Enables detailed information collection on hardware and software.
Application Dependency Mapping: Facilitates tracking of application dependencies for effective cloud migration.
Agentless Discovery: Assists in uncovering assets without the need for specialized agents.
Network Topology Visualization: Assists in visual representation of network connections.
Cloud Integration: Simplifies the integration with cloud services for enhanced insights.

What benefits should be evaluated in Device42?

Improved Decision-Making: Optimizes resource utilization and boosts strategic initiatives.
Seamless Integration: Enhances connectivity with platforms like ServiceNow.
Efficiency in Auditing: Eases compliance and auditing processes.
Simplified Onboarding: Streamlines initial setups and deployment.
Enhanced Operational Insights: Supports better management through comprehensive data visualization.

Device42 is widely used across sectors for IT asset and infrastructure management, where automation in inventory and documentation aids compliance and resource optimization. It excels in industries requiring integration with existing systems and comprehensive network solutions. Application dependency mapping bolsters cloud migration efficiency in enterprise environments.

Device42

Sample Customers

Google, Linkedin, Cisco, Juniper Networks, DellEMC, Comcast, Mastercard, Quest Diagnostics

Florida Hospital, Mitchell International

Computershare, Concur, Doosan, Fitch Ratings Inc., Fujitsu, HomeAway, Jasper Wireless, Mercedes-Benz, Square, Twitch, UCSB, Zayo Group Inc.

Buyer's Guide

BMC Track-It! vs. Device42

September 2026

Free Report: BMC Track-It! vs. Device42

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Track-It! vs. Device42 and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

918,169 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Track-It! vs. Device42 report.

See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.